"The DNA from the Armistead line is flawed." My wife's family would probably agree with you there (I write this while sitting on my Father-In-Law's couch). That aside though, I didn't know there were any participants from Armistead's line yet. Bob and I are the only list members that I am aware of that are direct male descendants of Armistead: both of us through sons of his son, Robert Albert. I keep toying with the idea, but I just can't justify the expense (especially now that the question of Thomas' relationship to Alexander has been adequately proven). Below is the descendancy from Alexander as I extrapolated it from the FTDNA site: 1.Alexander Younger (b.1681) -2.Thomas Younger (b.1707) --3.William Younger (b.1744) ---4.Williamson Younger (b.1782) ----5.William Younger (b.1803) -----6.James Samuel Younger (b.1831) ------7.James Henry Younger (b.1866) -------8.William Stanley Younger (b.1895) --------9.Participant #92740 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 ---4.Thomas Younger (b.1784) ----5.Josephus Younger (b.1821) -----6.Josephus W. Younger (b.1856) ------7.Stanley E. Younger (b.1896) -------8.Participant's Father --------9.Participant #81432 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 -2.James Younger (b.1720) --3.Thomas *James* Younger (b.1761) ---4.Thomas Younger (b.1790) ----5.William Alexander Younger (b.1828) -----6.John Willis Younger (b.1869) ------7.Claude Elmer Elzy Younger (b.1900) -------8.Participant #86386 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 ---4.Joseph Younger (b.1803) ----5.William Green Younger (b.1839) -----6.Earle Younger (b.1876) ------7.Merwin Younger (b.1900) -------8.Participant #N32738 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 - Stephen On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Younger <Mark.Younger@hilton.com>wrote: > My theory's: In order of probability > > William's wife, Pricilla Jones had my John William(eldest son before > William) - which is my line > The DNA from the Armistead line is flawed. How many males have been tested > form the William, Williamson, Armistead line? > Something happen along the way after William and John William... affair , > adoption etc > > > Mark Younger CFM > Director Facilities Administration > Hilton Hotels Corporation > Memphis Operations/Data Center > 755 Crossover Lane > Memphis ,TN 38117 > Tel: 901 374-5458 > Fax :901 374-5458 > > "Necessity is the Mother of Invention" > >
Your James Samuel was my John W brother so we should match - both sons of William and Pricilla ... So you have not had your DNA tested? You and Bob? Mark Younger CFM Director Facilities Administration Hilton Hotels Corporation Memphis Operations/Data Center 755 Crossover Lane Memphis ,TN 38117 Tel: 901 374-5458 Fax :901 374-5458 "Necessity is the Mother of Invention" -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of L S Y Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:37 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Source Records "The DNA from the Armistead line is flawed." My wife's family would probably agree with you there (I write this while sitting on my Father-In-Law's couch). That aside though, I didn't know there were any participants from Armistead's line yet. Bob and I are the only list members that I am aware of that are direct male descendants of Armistead: both of us through sons of his son, Robert Albert. I keep toying with the idea, but I just can't justify the expense (especially now that the question of Thomas' relationship to Alexander has been adequately proven). Below is the descendancy from Alexander as I extrapolated it from the FTDNA site: 1.Alexander Younger (b.1681) -2.Thomas Younger (b.1707) --3.William Younger (b.1744) ---4.Williamson Younger (b.1782) ----5.William Younger (b.1803) -----6.James Samuel Younger (b.1831) ------7.James Henry Younger (b.1866) -------8.William Stanley Younger (b.1895) --------9.Participant #92740 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 ---4.Thomas Younger (b.1784) ----5.Josephus Younger (b.1821) -----6.Josephus W. Younger (b.1856) ------7.Stanley E. Younger (b.1896) -------8.Participant's Father --------9.Participant #81432 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 -2.James Younger (b.1720) --3.Thomas *James* Younger (b.1761) ---4.Thomas Younger (b.1790) ----5.William Alexander Younger (b.1828) -----6.John Willis Younger (b.1869) ------7.Claude Elmer Elzy Younger (b.1900) -------8.Participant #86386 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 ---4.Joseph Younger (b.1803) ----5.William Green Younger (b.1839) -----6.Earle Younger (b.1876) ------7.Merwin Younger (b.1900) -------8.Participant #N32738 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 - Stephen On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 6:53 AM, Mark Younger <Mark.Younger@hilton.com>wrote: > My theory's: In order of probability > > William's wife, Pricilla Jones had my John William(eldest son before > William) - which is my line > The DNA from the Armistead line is flawed. How many males have been tested > form the William, Williamson, Armistead line? > Something happen along the way after William and John William... affair , > adoption etc > > > Mark Younger CFM > Director Facilities Administration > Hilton Hotels Corporation > Memphis Operations/Data Center > 755 Crossover Lane > Memphis ,TN 38117 > Tel: 901 374-5458 > Fax :901 374-5458 > > "Necessity is the Mother of Invention" > > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message
I was worried I might have to clarify that post a little. The descendancy I listed is for the current DNA participants, not for me. Mine looks like this: 1.Alexander Younger (b.1681) -2.Thomas Younger (b.1707) --3.William Younger (b.1744) ---4.Williamson Younger (b.1782) ----5.Armistead Younger (b.1811) -----6.Robert Albert Younger (b.1853) ------7.Charles Edward Younger (b.1881) -------8.Richard Younger (b.1813) --------9.My Father ---------10.Me I am descended from James Samuel (through his son, Wilson Leonard), but the link is my great-grandmother, Rutha Viola, so the DNA chain is broken for me in that direction. - Stephen On Mon, Dec 22, 2008 at 1:49 PM, Mark Younger <Mark.Younger@hilton.com>wrote: > Your James Samuel was my John W brother so we should match - both sons of > William and Pricilla ... So you have not had your DNA tested? You and Bob? > > Mark Younger CFM > Director Facilities Administration > Hilton Hotels Corporation > Memphis Operations/Data Center > 755 Crossover Lane > Memphis ,TN 38117 > Tel: 901 374-5458 > Fax :901 374-5458 > > "Necessity is the Mother of Invention" > > -----Original Message----- > From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On Behalf Of L S Y > Sent: Monday, December 22, 2008 2:37 PM > To: younger@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Source Records > > "The DNA from the Armistead line is flawed." > My wife's family would probably agree with you there (I write this while > sitting on my Father-In-Law's couch). That aside though, I didn't know > there were any participants from Armistead's line yet. Bob and I are the > only list members that I am aware of that are direct male descendants of > Armistead: both of us through sons of his son, Robert Albert. I keep > toying > with the idea, but I just can't justify the expense (especially now that > the > question of Thomas' relationship to Alexander has been adequately proven). > > Below is the descendancy from Alexander as I extrapolated it from the FTDNA > site: > 1.Alexander Younger (b.1681) > -2.Thomas Younger (b.1707) > --3.William Younger (b.1744) > ---4.Williamson Younger (b.1782) > ----5.William Younger (b.1803) > -----6.James Samuel Younger (b.1831) > ------7.James Henry Younger (b.1866) > -------8.William Stanley Younger (b.1895) > --------9.Participant #92740 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 > ---4.Thomas Younger (b.1784) > ----5.Josephus Younger (b.1821) > -----6.Josephus W. Younger (b.1856) > ------7.Stanley E. Younger (b.1896) > -------8.Participant's Father > --------9.Participant #81432 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 > -2.James Younger (b.1720) > --3.Thomas *James* Younger (b.1761) > ---4.Thomas Younger (b.1790) > ----5.William Alexander Younger (b.1828) > -----6.John Willis Younger (b.1869) > ------7.Claude Elmer Elzy Younger (b.1900) > -------8.Participant #86386 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 > ---4.Joseph Younger (b.1803) > ----5.William Green Younger (b.1839) > -----6.Earle Younger (b.1876) > ------7.Merwin Younger (b.1900) > -------8.Participant #N32738 DNA:14,24,14,08,11,13,12,12,12,14,13,30 > > - Stephen >