Brownie.....We had this discussion on this list awhile back. Willie felt the names were separate and distinct. I can't remember if anyone came up with a case where they were both used...maybe this is one!

No, I think the same thing. I do believe they are separate and distinct. The problem lies with the transcribers, who missed the "us" on the end of Josephus and left it off. Do you subscribe to Ancestry? ----- Original Message ----- From: <NKYList@aol.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2001 7:06 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Joseph vs Josephus > > Brownie.....We had this discussion on this list awhile back. Willie felt the > names were separate and distinct. I can't remember if anyone came up with a > case where they were both used...maybe this is one! > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > Younger Mailing List, Please feel welcome here. If Need any help just e-mail Younger-admin@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > Ancestry.com Genealogical Databases > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist2.asp > Search over 2500 databases with one easy query! > >

Willie must have been asleep if she said that. I have seen Joseph and Josephus in the same document which caused me to believe that they were interchangeable. NKYList@aol.com wrote: > Brownie.....We had this discussion on this list awhile back. Willie felt the > names were separate and distinct. I can't remember if anyone came up with a > case where they were both used...maybe this is one! > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > Younger Mailing List, Please feel welcome here. If Need any help just e-mail Younger-admin@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > Ancestry.com Genealogical Databases > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist2.asp > Search over 2500 databases with one easy query!