Wilma N- Well, that was really dumb on my part. Of course Nancy's children are with their father in the 1880 census and he has a new wife. There would be no reason that our Nancy would be living with Ellen Younger and not have her children with her, even if she and Nathan divorced. Do you have any idea what Nancy this might be? By the way the 1850 clearly states Nancey Younger was age 13, yes that was the spelling, but nothing different than what was posted by me. I have it if you want a copy. Back to the drawing board---again! Oh while on this family group, did Nancy have a brother Porter Younger b 1833? Another one of those names thrown my way. Thanks for all your help Wilma, I really appreciate it! Linda ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 11:53 PM Subject: [YOUNGER] Fw: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > Here is the reply I received from Carolyne Bowles (wife of Ralph). She does > the researching, I had her listed under "Ralph" by mistake. > > I would tend to agree that the Nancy Estes in 1880 would not be Nancy > Younger Woodworth -- since her children were with Nathan in 1870 and 1880. > But, unless we can find a death record or cemetery record -- guess we won't > know for sure. > > Wilma > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Ralph Bowles > To: Wilma Norton > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 12:30 PM > Subject: Re: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > > > Dear Wilma, > How very nice to hear from you. I have been away from family research > most of this year as other priorities have required my time. I am now > trying to get back to this very interesting (sometimes) obsession. > I can understand the question per Nancy Younger's time of death as I > have questioned that myself. I believe her to be the Nancy Younger who > married Nathan Woodworth and is in the 1860 AR. census with his family. I > have always assumed she died prior to the 1870 census because she is not i n > that census with Nathan though her children are and it appears he has a new > wife Mary. Some of Nancy's children are still with Nathan and Mary in 1880. > Because the children are with Nathan, I assumed Nancy had died. However, in > the 1880 census, Ellen Younger is in the census with a Nancy Estes age 48, > having one wonder if Nancy might have still been alive. Following ages in > prior census, I believe she should have been 43 not 48. Rechecking the > original census might find that 8 was really a 3. One of many interesting > mysteries. > The Younger Message Board with Rootsweb sounds very interesting. > Carolyne > > Wilma Norton wrote: > > Hi Carolyne, The death date for Nancy, above, has come into question. Can > you tell me what you know about where and when she died? Wilma Nortonby the > way -- are you subscribed to the Younger mail list at rootsweb? We do a lot > of discussing of Youngers there, come and join us. > YOUNGER-L-request@rootsweb.com is how you subscribe. > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me know.) > > ============================== > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com >

I have looked at the 1880 AR. census Water Creek, Marion Co., AR. 158-158 Estis, Nancy 48 F w IL SC TN William 17 son AR SC TN Younger, Ellen 76 w NC NC NC Thomas & Ellen's daughter Nancy was born in Hopkins Co., KY. abt 1837. In this census, Alexander and Lucinda are in house 157-157. I assume this would be next door. C. Bowles JYG wrote: > Wilma N- > > Well, that was really dumb on my part. Of course Nancy's children are with > their father in the 1880 census and he has a new wife. There would be no > reason that our Nancy would be living with Ellen Younger and not have her > children with her, even if she and Nathan divorced. Do you have any idea > what Nancy this might be? By the way the 1850 clearly states Nancey Younger > was age 13, yes that was the spelling, but nothing different than what was > posted by me. I have it if you want a copy. Back to the drawing > board---again! > > Oh while on this family group, did Nancy have a brother Porter Younger b > 1833? Another one of those names thrown my way. Thanks for all your help > Wilma, I really appreciate it! > > Linda > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 11:53 PM > Subject: [YOUNGER] Fw: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > > > Here is the reply I received from Carolyne Bowles (wife of Ralph). She > does > > the researching, I had her listed under "Ralph" by mistake. > > > > I would tend to agree that the Nancy Estes in 1880 would not be Nancy > > Younger Woodworth -- since her children were with Nathan in 1870 and 1880. > > But, unless we can find a death record or cemetery record -- guess we > won't > > know for sure. > > > > Wilma > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Ralph Bowles > > To: Wilma Norton > > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 12:30 PM > > Subject: Re: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > > > > > > Dear Wilma, > > How very nice to hear from you. I have been away from family > research > > most of this year as other priorities have required my time. I am now > > trying to get back to this very interesting (sometimes) obsession. > > I can understand the question per Nancy Younger's time of death as I > > have questioned that myself. I believe her to be the Nancy Younger who > > married Nathan Woodworth and is in the 1860 AR. census with his family. I > > have always assumed she died prior to the 1870 census because she is not i > n > > that census with Nathan though her children are and it appears he has a > new > > wife Mary. Some of Nancy's children are still with Nathan and Mary in > 1880. > > Because the children are with Nathan, I assumed Nancy had died. However, > in > > the 1880 census, Ellen Younger is in the census with a Nancy Estes age 48, > > having one wonder if Nancy might have still been alive. Following ages in > > prior census, I believe she should have been 43 not 48. Rechecking the > > original census might find that 8 was really a 3. One of many interesting > > mysteries. > > The Younger Message Board with Rootsweb sounds very interesting. > > Carolyne > > > > Wilma Norton wrote: > > > > Hi Carolyne, The death date for Nancy, above, has come into question. > Can > > you tell me what you know about where and when she died? Wilma Nortonby > the > > way -- are you subscribed to the Younger mail list at rootsweb? We do a > lot > > of discussing of Youngers there, come and join us. > > YOUNGER-L-request@rootsweb.com is how you subscribe. > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto > www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me > know.) > > > > ============================== > > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > Younger Mailing List, Please feel welcome here. If Need any help just e-mail Younger-admin@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp

This is the first I've heard of a Porter Younger, I wouldn't know where to place him. ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 12, 2001 12:15 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Fw: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > Wilma N- > > Well, that was really dumb on my part. Of course Nancy's children are with > their father in the 1880 census and he has a new wife. There would be no > reason that our Nancy would be living with Ellen Younger and not have her > children with her, even if she and Nathan divorced. Do you have any idea > what Nancy this might be? By the way the 1850 clearly states Nancey Younger > was age 13, yes that was the spelling, but nothing different than what was > posted by me. I have it if you want a copy. Back to the drawing > board---again! > > Oh while on this family group, did Nancy have a brother Porter Younger b > 1833? Another one of those names thrown my way. Thanks for all your help > Wilma, I really appreciate it! > > Linda > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 11:53 PM > Subject: [YOUNGER] Fw: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > > > > Here is the reply I received from Carolyne Bowles (wife of Ralph). She > does > > the researching, I had her listed under "Ralph" by mistake. > > > > I would tend to agree that the Nancy Estes in 1880 would not be Nancy > > Younger Woodworth -- since her children were with Nathan in 1870 and 1880. > > But, unless we can find a death record or cemetery record -- guess we > won't > > know for sure. > > > > Wilma > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Ralph Bowles > > To: Wilma Norton > > Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2001 12:30 PM > > Subject: Re: Nancy (Younger) Woodworth > > > > > > Dear Wilma, > > How very nice to hear from you. I have been away from family > research > > most of this year as other priorities have required my time. I am now > > trying to get back to this very interesting (sometimes) obsession. > > I can understand the question per Nancy Younger's time of death as I > > have questioned that myself. I believe her to be the Nancy Younger who > > married Nathan Woodworth and is in the 1860 AR. census with his family. I > > have always assumed she died prior to the 1870 census because she is not i > n > > that census with Nathan though her children are and it appears he has a > new > > wife Mary. Some of Nancy's children are still with Nathan and Mary in > 1880. > > Because the children are with Nathan, I assumed Nancy had died. However, > in > > the 1880 census, Ellen Younger is in the census with a Nancy Estes age 48, > > having one wonder if Nancy might have still been alive. Following ages in > > prior census, I believe she should have been 43 not 48. Rechecking the > > original census might find that 8 was really a 3. One of many interesting > > mysteries. > > The Younger Message Board with Rootsweb sounds very interesting. > > Carolyne > > > > Wilma Norton wrote: > > > > Hi Carolyne, The death date for Nancy, above, has come into question. > Can > > you tell me what you know about where and when she died? Wilma Nortonby > the > > way -- are you subscribed to the Younger mail list at rootsweb? We do a > lot > > of discussing of Youngers there, come and join us. > > YOUNGER-L-request@rootsweb.com is how you subscribe. > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto > www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me > know.) > > > > ============================== > > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > Younger Mailing List, Please feel welcome here. If Need any help just e-mail Younger-admin@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp > >