Yes - I believe he is the one that went back to England - of English(gentry) ancestry not Scottish - Frankly there so many of them that I not sure which one I am connected to. The only thing that I can proved , only by census records, is my William Younger came to West Tennessee in the 1840's - where and who he came from is unknown. I think we will never know beyond this. Mark Younger  CFM Director Facilities Administration Hilton Hotels Corporation Memphis Operations/Data Center 755 Crossover Lane Memphis ,TN 38117 Tel: 901 374-5458 Fax :901  374-5458 "Necessity is the Mother of Invention"  -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mbmackie1231@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:12 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Source Records Sarah Younger (now wife of Alexander Younger) confesses to his lordship Philip Calvert (out of the hearing of her said Husband) that she gives up all claims. She was Sarah Claw before Alexander & before Claw she was Sarah Cole. Thus the closed door session. More about Sarah & Alexander of Daleys Desire later. Mark...you do realize that the above Youngers are not ours, don't you? Not the same Alexander. **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Issac and Esau Boston were half-brothers of Richard Boston. All three were sons of Henry Boston. Richard Boston was the illegitimate son born of Judith Best. She later married a Thomas Davis. Note that there is tons of complicated stuff like this. Maryland Somerset County Judicial Records, 1675-1677: http://aomol.net/megafile/msa/speccol/sc2900/sc2908/000001/000089/html/am89--80.html http://aomol.net/megafile/msa/speccol/sc2900/sc2908/000001/000089/html/am89--81.html ------------------------------------------- Sarah Younger (now wife of Alexander Younger) confesses to his lordship Philip Calvert (out of the hearing of her said Husband) that she gives up all claims. She was Sarah Claw before Alexander & before Claw she was Sarah Cole. Thus the closed door session. More about Sarah & Alexander of Daleys Desire later. On the backside of the aforegoing Deed was written Viz.t Memd that the within named Sarah Younger the now wife of the within named Alexander Younger being secretly Examined out of the hearing of her said Husband doth Confesse that she doth freely & Voluntarily give upp all her right title Clayme & demand whatsoever of & in the within named parcell or tract of land & p.rmisses without the feare or threats of her said Husband In testimony whereof I have hereunto subscribed my name the sixth day of Decemb.r Annog Dm 1676 Philip Calvert Maryland Provincial Court Land Records 1676-1700 http://aomol.net/megafile/msa/speccol/sc2900/sc2908/000001/000717/html/am717--7.html Mark Younger  CFM Director Facilities Administration Hilton Hotels Corporation Memphis Operations/Data Center 755 Crossover Lane Memphis ,TN 38117 Tel: 901 374-5458 Fax :901  374-5458 "Necessity is the Mother of Invention"  -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Roberta J. Estes Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 3:58 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Source Records Well that's the one thing we can say without any question! -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mbmackie1231@aol.com Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 4:53 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Source Records In a message dated 12/19/2008 3:45:56 P.M. Central Standard Time, restes@comcast.net writes: Our ancestors are so confusing. And it's no wonder we are all such a bunch of mutts. :-) **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000 025) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

......time? waits for no man... I made that much out. And then "something,something, something".....was dead. What's the verse "was dead but now is alive"? **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)

My researcher as told me that the Universities of Maryland and Virginia gave him the following info concerning records: Up until about the 1740s (couple of generations) "family" relationships were many times described as generational and not biological. You are using a newer "Puritan" type view of "family" (which was a strict interpretation of the Church of England & only existed in a small region of "New England") and not the actual meaning as it was used at the time (prior to about the 1740s) in the Maryland, Virginia & Carolina colonies by banished low-land Scots Presbyterians and French/Dutch Huguenots. Many of the Younger's where the banished low -land Scots... It was not uncommon for the Scottish (plus the Welsh, Irish & French) to have a second set of children by a much younger wife (one generation removed) and refer to this set of children as "grandchildren". Note that the 1st wife does not have to be necessarily dead ("divorce" after all was an evil Catholic & Church of England edict). When the old man died; the second wife could re-marry (all women had to be married) & a new set of children would be produced. This means that one "will" or "deed" (which could only be executed by a man) could refer to three different sets of children (the word "cousin" did not exist; invented at Harvard for history of emigrants of "Persons of Quality" & etc) by the wife's current last name. But actually refer to a prior "family" under a different name. Note that if the younger wife did not re-marry; she could be referred to as a "daughter" of the old man by the children of the 1st wife. The word "daughter" (and "son") meant different things to different groups of people. Most contemporary docs did not use either word because of the above (or was cleaned-up by various translators and the original no longer exist; see Harvard above & below). This can only be unscrambled (inferred) from the few original (un translated) "wills" by beds who were given to seemingly unrelated women. Beds (wife's), guns (sons) & cows (daughters & grandchildren) were given in that general order; which was the order of the "higher class" of people in England & Scotland at that time. "Whore, "Hore", or "Hure" implies a woman who did not re-marry and does not live with the old man's family. It may not of meant anything other than that someone was insulted by her living alone. But our friends at Harvard took offence & did not "translate" these parts of the original wills (and family Bibles) so we can never know how these extended families where constructed & that "cousins" may have been in fact "half" brothers & sisters inter-related by common mothers or fathers. (This is why there are so many of them in one very small region.) And these "translators" also supplied (or removed) the "son" and "daughter" parts to make it fit the Harvard Puritan view of "Persons of Quality". Also - Most colonial records( many where destroyed) requires some understanding of pre & post Latinized English spelling in three locations; Scotland, England & the early colonies. Example: Youngare = Younger Saruant = Servant Haue = Have Sarue = Serve Seaven = Seven Aleauen = Eleven Henry Frith brought his Saruant Richard Dods to haue Judgmt of this Courtt for his time he is Judged to Sarue Seaven yeares Thomas Cox brought his Saruant Francis Oxley to haue Judgmt of this Courtt for his time he is Judged to Sarue Seaven yeares Tho: Martin brought his Saruant Jno Youngare to haue judgment of this Courtt for his time he is Judged to Serue Seauen yeares Natha: Euitt brought his Saruant John Burcher to haue Judgment of this Courtt for his time he is Judged to sarue Seauen yeares Mr William Hamblton brought his Saruant Elizabeth Grundell to haue Judgmt of this Courtt for her time She is Judged to Sarue Seauen yeares Tho: Heythcott brought his Saruant Michell Foster to haue Judgment of this Courtt for his time he is Judged to Sarue Aleauen yeares Tho: Scellington brough his Saruant George Mackeelling to haue Judgment of this Courtt for his time his Judged to Sarue Six yeares Ralph Dawson brought his Saruant John Stonestreet to haue Judgment of this Courtt for his time he is Judged to Sarue Seauen yeares [ Ref: Proceedings of the County Courts of Kent (1658-1676), Talbot (1662-1674), and Somerset (1665-1668) Counties Pg 454 Talbot County Court Proceedings, 1662-1674 (abt 1669?)] Mark Younger  CFM Director Facilities Administration Hilton Hotels Corporation Memphis Operations/Data Center 755 Crossover Lane Memphis ,TN 38117 Tel: 901 374-5458 Fax :901  374-5458 "Necessity is the Mother of Invention"  -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Wilma (Younger) Norton Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:51 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... I have eight Thomas Youngers -- these below and a whole bunch more born after 1790. Most, if not all the dates are estimates, most of the information came from the FOTY book or from this List. 1. Alexander and Rebecca Mills had a Thomas who had two unknown wives and about 15 children. 2. One of the children from the first unknown wife was named Thomas born ca 1734. 3. Humphrey and Mary Pell of MD had a Thomas born ca 1712 4. John and Sarah Kennard had a Thomas born ca. 1753 5. James and Anna Nash had a Thomas born March 10, 1761 NC married Mary Nall 6. William and Mary Watkins had a Thomas born ca 1784 married Sarah Brown 7. Unknown parents had a Thomas born ca. 1790 married Martha Crowder 8. Thomas and Mary Nall had a Thomas born bet. 1790-1791 NC married Ellen London. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roberta J. Estes" <restes@comcast.net> To: <younger@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:11 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... >I don't see any evidence of a second Thomas being part of the time between > 1700 and 1791. The reason is that by 1740 Thomas buys the land from > Driscoll saying it was Alexander's. By 1749 Fretwell is involved and we > know > Thomas's early children were "of the half blood" (based on the > estate/lawsuit records) and one of them married a Fretwell. I'd be glad > to > contribute my research notes to Larry and I'm all for cleaning up > genealogy > messes everyplace. I'm very glad someone is working on them. > > Bobbi > > -----Original Message----- > From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On > Behalf Of Mbmackie1231@aol.com > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:45 PM > To: younger@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... > > I have a Thomas Younger b. ABT. 1700...son of Alexander. > > Then a Thomas Younger b. 1798...son of William the above Thomas's > brother. > > (can't be...too much time between) > > I don't think the Thomas b. 1700 lived until 1791. I think there was > another in between him and the one who died in 1791. > > Brownie > **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and > favorite sites in one place. Try it now. > (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000 > 010) > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

It's all in the family, Stephen.....or is it "Larry?" LOL. Love, Brownie **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)

If you're referring to the very bottom, no, I can't make it out either. Since she died several years after her husband, the stone was no doubt ordered by one or more of her children. I can make out a word here and there: kindred in the second line, dead in the third. I believe she was in Utah with her daughter, Mary, who married John Mayberry, and they were baptized into the Mormon faith. So, possibly it was saying something along those religion lines. Only a guess as I can't make out what it says. The photo was taken by another researcher and shared with me, so I've never been to the grave. It would be interesting to go there and see if I could make out what it says. ----- Original Message ----- From: "L S Y" <lsy.genealogy@gmail.com> To: <younger@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2008 11:54 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... >I was just looking at the headstone photo you posted at findagrave. Do you > have a full transcription of the text at the bottom? I can't quite make > it > out from the photo. > > Thanks! > > - Stephen > > On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Wilma (Younger) Norton < > wilma.norton@cox.net> wrote: > >> No - Mary Nall married Thomas Younger. I have a photo of her gravestone, >> which reads "Mary, dau. of John and Mary Nall, and wife of Thomas >> Younger" >> born Dec 25, 1768, died Feb. 1861. She is buried in the Younger Cemetery >> in >> Cedar Co., MO. >> >> I believe most of us from this line think that John Nall's wife was named >> Martha "Patsy" Glass, but it's always possible he also married someone >> named >> Mary. Or else, whoever had the stone engraved, thought her name was >> Mary. >> One of those unknown things. >> >> Wilma >> >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> From: <Mbmackie1231@aol.com> >> To: <younger@rootsweb.com> >> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:19 PM >> Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... >> >> >> > >> > In a message dated 12/16/2008 12:35:51 P.M. Central Standard Time, >> > lsy.genealogy@gmail.com writes: >> > >> > much of which >> > I KNOW is incorrect): >> > >> > >> > >> > Does that mean we shouldn't point out what we think is incorrect? My >> > thinking is that somebody needs to camp in Halifax/Essex or at the VA >> > archives for >> > as long as it takes to dig up information. I did some work years ago >> > at >> > the >> > University of VA archives at the UV library. A record found there >> > indicated >> > Thomas married "Mary North"....not Northern....in Essex/ Old >> Rappahanock. >> > There was a family of Norths who have a history there. I have never >> > known >> > where the "Northern" came from. I have also speculated that there >> > were >> > two >> > Thomases. The Norths from 1692-1726: Abraham m. Sarah Rouzie >> (Alexander >> > was >> > indentured by Edward Rowzee) 1692; Mary North, widow of William >> > North, >> > married >> > John Mills. Jr. 1706. There are two more in the marriage index of Old >> > Rappahanockm but they're insignificant. >> > >> > Did not Mary Nall marry James Younger? >> > >> > Brownie >> > **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and >> > favorite sites in one place. Try it now. >> > ( >> http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010 >> ) >> > >> > ------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the >> quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Sorry ... meant to sens that directly to Wilma. I am referring to Mary Nall's headstone in Cedar County, Missouri. - Stephen On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:54 AM, L S Y <lsy.genealogy@gmail.com> wrote: > I was just looking at the headstone photo you posted at findagrave. Do you > have a full transcription of the text at the bottom? I can't quite make it > out from the photo. > > Thanks! > > - Stephen

I was just looking at the headstone photo you posted at findagrave. Do you have a full transcription of the text at the bottom? I can't quite make it out from the photo. Thanks! - Stephen On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 8:51 AM, Wilma (Younger) Norton < wilma.norton@cox.net> wrote: > No - Mary Nall married Thomas Younger. I have a photo of her gravestone, > which reads "Mary, dau. of John and Mary Nall, and wife of Thomas Younger" > born Dec 25, 1768, died Feb. 1861. She is buried in the Younger Cemetery > in > Cedar Co., MO. > > I believe most of us from this line think that John Nall's wife was named > Martha "Patsy" Glass, but it's always possible he also married someone > named > Mary. Or else, whoever had the stone engraved, thought her name was Mary. > One of those unknown things. > > Wilma > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <Mbmackie1231@aol.com> > To: <younger@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:19 PM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... > > > > > > In a message dated 12/16/2008 12:35:51 P.M. Central Standard Time, > > lsy.genealogy@gmail.com writes: > > > > much of which > > I KNOW is incorrect): > > > > > > > > Does that mean we shouldn't point out what we think is incorrect? My > > thinking is that somebody needs to camp in Halifax/Essex or at the VA > > archives for > > as long as it takes to dig up information. I did some work years ago at > > the > > University of VA archives at the UV library. A record found there > > indicated > > Thomas married "Mary North"....not Northern....in Essex/ Old > Rappahanock. > > There was a family of Norths who have a history there. I have never > > known > > where the "Northern" came from. I have also speculated that there were > > two > > Thomases. The Norths from 1692-1726: Abraham m. Sarah Rouzie > (Alexander > > was > > indentured by Edward Rowzee) 1692; Mary North, widow of William North, > > married > > John Mills. Jr. 1706. There are two more in the marriage index of Old > > Rappahanockm but they're insignificant. > > > > Did not Mary Nall marry James Younger? > > > > Brownie > > **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and > > favorite sites in one place. Try it now. > > ( > http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010 > ) > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > > quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

In a message dated 12/18/2008 1:05:39 A.M. Central Standard Time, restes@comcast.net writes: I wonder if they were all related. That's what I wondered. **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)

In a message dated 12/18/2008 1:16:30 A.M. Central Standard Time, restes@comcast.net writes: sent this message two days ago and it just now arrived. I heard on another list that rootsweb is having problems. Apparently.....oh,well...gives them an excuse to start charging a fee next year...they already are making us "register." **************One site keeps you connected to all your email: AOL Mail, Gmail, and Yahoo Mail. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000025)

No - Mary Nall married Thomas Younger. I have a photo of her gravestone, which reads "Mary, dau. of John and Mary Nall, and wife of Thomas Younger" born Dec 25, 1768, died Feb. 1861. She is buried in the Younger Cemetery in Cedar Co., MO. I believe most of us from this line think that John Nall's wife was named Martha "Patsy" Glass, but it's always possible he also married someone named Mary. Or else, whoever had the stone engraved, thought her name was Mary. One of those unknown things. Wilma ----- Original Message ----- From: <Mbmackie1231@aol.com> To: <younger@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 1:19 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... > > In a message dated 12/16/2008 12:35:51 P.M. Central Standard Time, > lsy.genealogy@gmail.com writes: > > much of which > I KNOW is incorrect): > > > > Does that mean we shouldn't point out what we think is incorrect? My > thinking is that somebody needs to camp in Halifax/Essex or at the VA > archives for > as long as it takes to dig up information. I did some work years ago at > the > University of VA archives at the UV library. A record found there > indicated > Thomas married "Mary North"....not Northern....in Essex/ Old Rappahanock. > There was a family of Norths who have a history there. I have never > known > where the "Northern" came from. I have also speculated that there were > two > Thomases. The Norths from 1692-1726: Abraham m. Sarah Rouzie (Alexander > was > indentured by Edward Rowzee) 1692; Mary North, widow of William North, > married > John Mills. Jr. 1706. There are two more in the marriage index of Old > Rappahanockm but they're insignificant. > > Did not Mary Nall marry James Younger? > > Brownie > **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and > favorite sites in one place. Try it now. > (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010) > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message

We should definately point out the incorrect info. Unfortuantely, thanks to the "download GEDCOM > upload GEDCOM" method of "genealogy" that has persisted since they first became available online, there is so much duplication of incorrect and undocumented information (aka hearsay) that it's going to be impossible for me to eradicate it. Even if I could get it all cleaned up at FamilySearch, there's no way I could clean it out of every other online repository. When I first set up my database, my line ended at Thomas who died in Halifax. I couldn't prove that he was the same Thomas as the son of Alexander, so I didn't include Alexander. Since then, you all have convinced me that if he isn't Alexander's son, he is at least a grandson. So, what I propose to do is insert a version of documented events as close as I can and supply ample notes to outline an argument as reasonable as possible. I'll also need to insert comments on each bit of unproven or false information indicating why I feel it should be removed. My "disputes" of the other information will remain in the FS system for as long as the information does. This process isn't going to be easy - we're talking about several years worth of submissions and the inertia that goes along with that volume of information, which is why I'm asking for your help. What I need are cited sources of info for Thomas. I'll be scouring our past communications on this list and going over all of my old notes for info, but it would save me a TON of time if you could email me any notes you have off-list. Once I have a solid outline put together, I'll post it here for your review before I go after the online database with my hatchet. I'd like us to be as united in our opinion as possible on this one - call it a gift to our great-grandkids. - Stephen And my records show that Mary "Polly" Nall married Thomas James Younger, son of James Younger and Anna Nash in 1785 in North Carolina. This is Leni's line, if I'm not mistaken. On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 11:19 AM, <Mbmackie1231@aol.com> wrote: > > Does that mean we shouldn't point out what we think is incorrect? My > thinking is that somebody needs to camp in Halifax/Essex or at the VA > archives for > as long as it takes to dig up information. I did some work years ago at > the > University of VA archives at the UV library. A record found there > indicated > Thomas married "Mary North"....not Northern....in Essex/ Old Rappahanock. > There was a family of Norths who have a history there. I have never known > where the "Northern" came from. I have also speculated that there were > two > Thomases. The Norths from 1692-1726: Abraham m. Sarah Rouzie (Alexander > was > indentured by Edward Rowzee) 1692; Mary North, widow of William North, > married > John Mills. Jr. 1706. There are two more in the marriage index of Old > Rappahanockm but they're insignificant. > > Did not Mary Nall marry James Younger? > > Brownie > **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and > favorite sites in one place. Try it now. > ( > http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010 > ) > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

I sent this message two days ago and it just now arrived. I heard on another list that rootsweb is having problems. Bobbi -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Roberta J. Estes Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 3:13 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] From: Marriages from the Chester-le-StreetRegisters(1700-1749) This is from England? Thomas was a popular name. I wonder if they were all related. Bobbi -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mbmackie1231@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:58 PM To: Younger@rootsweb.com Subject: [YOUNGER] From: Marriages from the Chester-le-Street Registers(1700-1749) 1 Nov 1718 Thomas Younger = Jain Littell 3 Apr 1723 Thomas Younger = Anne Hall 5 Apr 1727 Thomas Younger = Thomasin Elenor Baillif 20 Apr 1735 Thomas Younger = Mary Pearson 22 Nov 1748 Thomas Younger = Hannah Robinson This listing is produced from an index that was originally prepared by Bill Rounce and entered onto computer by George Bell with the assistance of Sandra (Hope) Bell. This index is one of a number kindly made available to GENUKI by George Bell from his large _collection of Northumberland _ (http://www.genuki.bpears.org.uk/Bell.html) and Durham indexes. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000 010) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Nevermind...I have four things going here, and I got confused. William/Mary Watkins was SON of Thomas...and brother to one also?????????????? Sorry about that waste of time, folks! But the info on the "Norths" remains. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)

Nevermind...I have four things going here, and I got confused. William/Mary Watkins was SON of Thomas...and brother to one also?????????????? Sorry about that waste of time, folks! But the info on the "Norths" remains. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)

In a message dated 12/16/2008 2:12:28 P.M. Central Standard Time, restes@comcast.net writes: son of William the above Thomas's brother. This is what I said can't be. William Younger, who married Mary Watkins cannot be a brother to Thomas and still be producing childrenin 1798. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)

Who is Larry? **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)

This is from England? Thomas was a popular name. I wonder if they were all related. Bobbi -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mbmackie1231@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:58 PM To: Younger@rootsweb.com Subject: [YOUNGER] From: Marriages from the Chester-le-Street Registers(1700-1749) 1 Nov 1718 Thomas Younger = Jain Littell 3 Apr 1723 Thomas Younger = Anne Hall 5 Apr 1727 Thomas Younger = Thomasin Elenor Baillif 20 Apr 1735 Thomas Younger = Mary Pearson 22 Nov 1748 Thomas Younger = Hannah Robinson This listing is produced from an index that was originally prepared by Bill Rounce and entered onto computer by George Bell with the assistance of Sandra (Hope) Bell. This index is one of a number kindly made available to GENUKI by George Bell from his large _collection of Northumberland _ (http://www.genuki.bpears.org.uk/Bell.html) and Durham indexes. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000 010) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I don't see any evidence of a second Thomas being part of the time between 1700 and 1791. The reason is that by 1740 Thomas buys the land from Driscoll saying it was Alexander's. By 1749 Fretwell is involved and we know Thomas's early children were "of the half blood" (based on the estate/lawsuit records) and one of them married a Fretwell. I'd be glad to contribute my research notes to Larry and I'm all for cleaning up genealogy messes everyplace. I'm very glad someone is working on them. Bobbi -----Original Message----- From: younger-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:younger-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Mbmackie1231@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2008 2:45 PM To: younger@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Thomas Younger ... I have a Thomas Younger b. ABT. 1700...son of Alexander. Then a Thomas Younger b. 1798...son of William the above Thomas's brother. (can't be...too much time between) I don't think the Thomas b. 1700 lived until 1791. I think there was another in between him and the one who died in 1791. Brownie **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000 010) ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YOUNGER-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

1 Nov 1718 Thomas Younger = Jain Littell 3 Apr 1723 Thomas Younger = Anne Hall 5 Apr 1727 Thomas Younger = Thomasin Elenor Baillif 20 Apr 1735 Thomas Younger = Mary Pearson 22 Nov 1748 Thomas Younger = Hannah Robinson This listing is produced from an index that was originally prepared by Bill Rounce and entered onto computer by George Bell with the assistance of Sandra (Hope) Bell. This index is one of a number kindly made available to GENUKI by George Bell from his large _collection of Northumberland _ (http://www.genuki.bpears.org.uk/Bell.html) and Durham indexes. **************Make your life easier with all your friends, email, and favorite sites in one place. Try it now. (http://www.aol.com/?optin=new-dp&icid=aolcom40vanity&ncid=emlcntaolcom00000010)