I think the FTM is the best as far as layout is concerned. But the company makes it very hard to be flexible with it. It's hard to delete anything, and impossible to copy and paste. You end up with two "Harold Youngers" one with a wife and one without and can't make heads nor tails of which one to get rid of. They have too many updates for which they charge too much. Personally, I believe that uploading your family tree to ANY program is not an especially good idea, so since my initial mistake of uploading a Younger file to Family Tree way back when I was a novice at this (it's been erased), I haven't bothered. There were so many mistakes in dates and people in that first file I uploaded, I blush just thinking about it. I like Kindred Konnections and Ancestry for the bits and pieces of information I get from them. I haven't tried any other programs. And now that I'm getting closer to putting together my "book"....a compilation of information for my children...I wish I had a better vehicle for my information.

The IGI one may be the right one, next time I'm at the FHC I will look him up. Thanks ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:45 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Wilma N. > Henderson Azer N. Capt. Lockett's Company, Alabama, City Guards. Sergeant > Sergeant Confederate > [Civil War Service Records] ancestry.com > > http://www.geocities.com/r_leddy/cw/rosters/alctygd.html shows him as a > Sgt. Azer. N. Henderson. > > IGI has: > Azor HENDERSON Sex: M > Event(s): Birth: Abt. 1798 South Carolina > Parents: Father: Daniel HENDERSON Mother: Ann BROWN > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 3:31 PM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Wilma N. > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > As we get older, we find out we are YOUNGER (Submitted by Karen Yerby) > > ============================== > Create a FREE family website at MyFamily.com! > http://www.myfamily.com/banner.asp?ID=RWLIST2 > >

Browine- Boy I agree about FTM, they have their foot in everything. I bought their software but don't like it at all. I think I have purchased about every genealogy program out there. I use Generations, the DVD version is great. Wilma- Sorry about the pricing, I belong to several databases and get the charges mixed up. I think it's $19.95 a month for the 1900. Linda in KC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brownie MacKie" <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:48 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > The problem with genealogy.com is that it's run by good ole' money grubbin' > Family Tree Maker. All they want you to do is buy something. I have a > subscription to the library, but do not find it especially helpful anymore. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:46 PM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > > > I'm satisfied with ancestry.com also -- just wish the 1900 census was > > indexed! I would subscribe to genealogy library (FTM site) if they had > 1850 > > and 1900 both - which they do, 1850 is $50 and not a bad deal, but to get > > 1900 you have to fork out another $80. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Brownie MacKie <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> > > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:32 AM > > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > > > > Wilma...I like Ancestry and use it frequently. I thought perhaps I'd > > throw > > > in my two cents worth. I think it's worth the money. Brownie > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > > > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > > > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:18 PM > > > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > > As we get older, we find out we are YOUNGER (Submitted by Karen Yerby) > > > > ============================== > > Add as many as 10 Good Years To Your Life > > If you know how to reduce these risks. > > http://www.thirdage.com/health/wecare/hearthealth/index.html > > > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me know.) > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp >

Wilma I would be glad to do lookups in the 1900 if you give me a name and state. I can give you the page numbers or send a .gif of the page. Linda ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:46 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > I'm satisfied with ancestry.com also -- just wish the 1900 census was > indexed! I would subscribe to genealogy library (FTM site) if they had 1850 > and 1900 both - which they do, 1850 is $50 and not a bad deal, but to get > 1900 you have to fork out another $80. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Brownie MacKie <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:32 AM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > Wilma...I like Ancestry and use it frequently. I thought perhaps I'd > throw > > in my two cents worth. I think it's worth the money. Brownie > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:18 PM > > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > As we get older, we find out we are YOUNGER (Submitted by Karen Yerby) > > ============================== > Add as many as 10 Good Years To Your Life > If you know how to reduce these risks. > http://www.thirdage.com/health/wecare/hearthealth/index.html >

> Thanks for the info - are you satisfied with genealogylibrary - > > > > Wilma- I have been a subscriber for 2 years now and use it all of the time. You do have to learn how to access some things by going through "backdoors," but we seem to do that wherever we go for information. I do wish they would get the rest of the 1850 censuses and I do remember someone saying all of the censuses would have been online by May last year. I think there is a lot of competition going on. I did join one group and they still do not have anything on their site, so we do have to beware of some of these. Genealogylibrary does add 3 books a day to their site and I use it daily. They also have reduced their rates and I think it is $30 a year for the 1900 census and they have now completed all states now. The only thing I don't use and for me anyway, wasted money, was the Trees they offer. You can get them free on ancestry.com most of the time. Besides they have too many entries of guessing dates from this year to that and for me that is not helpful. Just my opinion. Linda in KC

Thanks for trying -- doesn't seem to be the one I'm looking for. Don't even know if he was in Ala. in 1850 - family went on to Miss. where dau. married -- these are in my husband's side of the family. ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:10 PM Subject: [YOUNGER] Wilma N. > A. Henderson m 90 lives alone b Scotland (Mobile, Mobile, AL) > > Thats the only other one. I also checked for Temperance. I checked spellings > Azer, Azor, Aser, Asor, Ozer, Ozar. Any ideas? > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > Younger Mailing List, Please feel welcome here. If Need any help just e-mail Younger-admin@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > Shop Ancestry - Everything you need to Discover, Preserve & Celebrate > your heritage! > http://shop.myfamily.com/ancestrycatalog > >

> For JYG, Thanks for the Pension document. I'm home from work > and have printed it out, but have some comments and questions. I also have a bvook around here somewhere on Andersonville. I will see if it mentions your Charles. It is one of the books on my "to read" list. Linda in KC

This was obtained on the ancestry.com website, under military. The dates are hard to read but appear to be: 2 Sep 1891 in WV invalid 24 Oct 1932 in OH widow 13 jan 1933 in OH minor Also just found: Andersonville Prisoners of War YOUNGER CHARLES PVT E 9 VA SENT TO MILLEN: NOV 11, 1864 That is all it says. Linda in KC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Clifford D. Younger, Sr." <cyounger@mediaone.net> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:14 AM Subject: [YOUNGER] Charles Younger, Meday Younger & J. Paul Wetherholt Document > For JYG, Thanks for the Pension document. I'm home from work > and have printed it out, but have some comments and questions. > Heres what I can figure out: > > _______________________________________________________ > > Name of Soldier Younger, Charles > > Name of Applicant Widow Younger, Meday > Minor Wetherholt, J. Paul (Gdn) > > Service E 9 WVA Inf > B 1 WVA Vet Inf > > Date of Filing Class Application No. Certificate No. State from > which filed > > ??????? Invalid 1061028 827,892 WVA > > ??????? Widow 1726843 Ohio > > ??????? Minor 1726843 A-3-18-33 Ohio > > > Attorney B.L. Meighen > > ??????? XC 2 653 617 > _______________________________________________________ > > Okay, this is what I know: > "Younger, Charles" is Charles Henry Younger Jr born 1 Jan 1844 > died 15 Aug 1932, four year Civil War Veteran. > > "Younger, Meday" is his fourth and last wife, fourty years > younger in age than Charles, mother of nine, the youngest of > whom was a 16 year old female, named Frances, at the time > of Charles death. Frances was 'mentally deficient' and due > to being a minor at her fathers death, was eligible to draw > his Civil War pension. This she did from Sep 1932 until Sep > 1977 when she passed away. > > "Wetherholt, J. Paul". ??? I haven't a clue as to who he is. Is he > a 'MINOR' as in age or a 'MINER" as in coal ??? The '(GDN)' > that follows his name: is he Meday's Guardian or is she his > Guardian ? > > The "service" is correct, these are the two units he served > with. > > The first application was done by Charles some years prior > to his death by the same Attorney. He was infirm and crippled > up from war wounds, prison time in Andersonville during the > war, 14 years in Moundsville State Prison for murder and > other assorted jail time for small misc crimes. The > certificate number 827,892 was his number assigned to his file > by the Department of the Army. When the Veteran's Administration > was started, his Army file was converted over and given the > XC 2 653 617 number. This number was also used during the > entire time that Frances Younger collected benefits. I have > a complete copy of this file obtianed from the VA and it is > 800 and some odd pages long, very interesting reading !!!!! > > The other two filings under application number 1726843 are > totally new info to me. > > SO........where did you copy this form from ??? Any idea > to whom or where I write for a copy of the last two files ??? > The four portions that I indicated with "??????", can you read > that info on your copy and fill in the blanks for me ??? Also > in the top right hand corner above Charles name, is that > blob a page number ??? > > Thanks again for the help and assistance. It is appreciated > more than you will ever know. > > CY > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > If anyone knows what would make a good line for this area. Don't hesitate to e-mail > > ============================== > Create a FREE family website at MyFamily.com! > http://www.myfamily.com/banner.asp?ID=RWLIST2 >

Wilma- I have access to the 1850 following through genealogylibrary.com: AL, AR, CA, CT, IL, IN, KY, LA, ME, MA, MS, NH, NM, NC, OR, PA, RI, TN, TX, UT, VT AND VA. They are indexed. I also have access to the 1900 also indexed for all of the US, also through the same place. I have access to other censuses through ancestry.com but they are not complete and are not indexed, so I don't use them too often unless I have a page number, which is how I found the 1880 you posted. By the way thankyou for giving the page numbers. Linda in KC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:01 PM Subject: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > What state/county is covered in your 1850 census? > ----- Original Message ----- > From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:47 AM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Two Thomases/ Two Elinors > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > If anyone knows what would make a good line for this area. Don't hesitate to e-mail > > ============================== > Ancestry.com Genealogical Databases > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist2.asp > Search over 2500 databases with one easy query! >

The problem with genealogy.com is that it's run by good ole' money grubbin' Family Tree Maker. All they want you to do is buy something. I have a subscription to the library, but do not find it especially helpful anymore. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:46 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > I'm satisfied with ancestry.com also -- just wish the 1900 census was > indexed! I would subscribe to genealogy library (FTM site) if they had 1850 > and 1900 both - which they do, 1850 is $50 and not a bad deal, but to get > 1900 you have to fork out another $80. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Brownie MacKie <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:32 AM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > Wilma...I like Ancestry and use it frequently. I thought perhaps I'd > throw > > in my two cents worth. I think it's worth the money. Brownie > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:18 PM > > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > As we get older, we find out we are YOUNGER (Submitted by Karen Yerby) > > ============================== > Add as many as 10 Good Years To Your Life > If you know how to reduce these risks. > http://www.thirdage.com/health/wecare/hearthealth/index.html > >

Thanks Brownie, too many similarities to be anything else. Oh yeah! I know about the mistakes on censuses and what you mean about the info being given by whoever answered the door. One of my ancestors was named Francis Marion Henson, definitely a male yet in a census he was listed as Miranda! We only found him because he was living with his father-in-law who was head of household, but there he was with his wife. I cannot complain too much though, some of these census hold keys to clues etc. Recently I found Frank and Jesse James in an 1880 census, can you believe them allowing themselves to be recorded? You never know what you will find. By the way everyone, last night I went back over the 1850 censuses and made .gif copies of them and attached them to the heads of household in my genealogy program. So, now I don't have to go hunt them down if anyone wants copies. It is also a better way to look back at them, for the ones which were hard to read. Linda in KC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brownie MacKie" <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Two Thomases/ Two Elinors > Same family. Two different census dates, two different kids giving the > information, and two different census takers......can you imagine how hard > it must have been to do the census before computers? Door to > door...boundaries changing...dumb census takers who didn't know what their > boundaries were. Etc. They also took the census from anybody in the house > who was willing to give information. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JYG" <jyg@kc.rr.com> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:08 AM > Subject: [YOUNGER] Two Thomases/ Two Elinors > > > > > > Can someone tell me where these belong? Thankyou... > > > > -1850 TN Giles County, District 14 (345) > > 53/53 5 Oct > > Thomas Younger 60 m none NC > > Ellender 45 f TN > > Parks 18 m none KY at school > > Mary 15 f KY at school > > Nancy 13 f KY at school > > Thomas 11 m KY at school > > Homer 9 m KY at school > > > > -1850 TN Lawrence County, District 8 (323) > > 475/475 9 Oct > > Thos. Younger 59 m millwright $100 NC > > Elinor 46 f NC > > Parks 17 m laborer KY > > Mary 13 f KY > > Nancy 9 f KY at school > > Thos. 7 m KY at school > > Lucy J. 6 f KY at school > > John L. 4 m KY > > Newton C. 2 m TN > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto > www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me > know.) > > > > ============================== > > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com > > > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me know.) > > ============================== > Add as many as 10 Good Years To Your Life > If you know how to reduce these risks. > http://www.thirdage.com/health/wecare/hearthealth/index.html >

Wilma...I like Ancestry and use it frequently. I thought perhaps I'd throw in my two cents worth. I think it's worth the money. Brownie ----- Original Message ----- From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:18 PM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > Thanks for the info - are you satisfied with genealogylibrary - when it > first came out I saw a lot of grumbling about not being able to access it, > so didn't subscribe. If they've improved, maybe I'll subscribe to it. I > also have ancestry.com but, like you said, it's not indexed and you have to > be very patient when searching through it. I don't have DSL line, so it is > very slow going. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:03 AM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > > Wilma- > > > > I have access to the 1850 following through genealogylibrary.com: > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > If anyone knows what would make a good line for this area. Don't hesitate to e-mail > > ============================== > Search over 1 Billion names at Ancestry.com! > http://www.ancestry.com/rd/rwlist1.asp > >

No problem - re FTM - I like their program, but agree they are there holding their hand out all the time! I think they would be much better off if they didn't charge for every little upgrade. LOTS of people grumble about them. ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:56 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > Browine- > Boy I agree about FTM, they have their foot in everything. I bought their > software but don't like it at all. I think I have purchased about every > genealogy program out there. I use Generations, the DVD version is great. > Wilma- > Sorry about the pricing, I belong to several databases and get the charges > mixed up. I think it's $19.95 a month for the 1900.

Thanks for the offer - if I had state and page numbers I could do it easily myself. I'm sure the prices will come down someday. ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:46 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > Wilma I would be glad to do lookups in the 1900 if you give me a name and > state. I can give you the page numbers or send a .gif of the page. >

I just went to their site -- didn't say anything about $30 for 1900 - said it was $80. ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:37 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > > > Thanks for the info - are you satisfied with genealogylibrary - > > > > > > Wilma- > I have been a subscriber for 2 years now and use it all of the time. You do > have to learn how to access some things by going through "backdoors," but we > seem to do that wherever we go for information. I do wish they would get the > rest of the 1850 censuses and I do remember someone saying all of the > censuses would have been online by May last year. I think there is a lot of > competition going on. I did join one group and they still do not have > anything on their site, so we do have to beware of some of these. > Genealogylibrary does add 3 books a day to their site and I use it daily. > They also have reduced their rates and I think it is $30 a year for the 1900 > census and they have now completed all states now. The only thing I don't > use and for me anyway, wasted money, was the Trees they offer. You can get > them free on ancestry.com most of the time. Besides they have too many > entries of guessing dates from this year to that and for me that is not > helpful. Just my opinion. > > Linda in KC > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > Younger Mailing List, Please feel welcome here. If Need any help just e-mail Younger-admin@rootsweb.com. > > ============================== > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com > >

I'm satisfied with ancestry.com also -- just wish the 1900 census was indexed! I would subscribe to genealogy library (FTM site) if they had 1850 and 1900 both - which they do, 1850 is $50 and not a bad deal, but to get 1900 you have to fork out another $80. ----- Original Message ----- From: Brownie MacKie <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 9:32 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > Wilma...I like Ancestry and use it frequently. I thought perhaps I'd throw > in my two cents worth. I think it's worth the money. Brownie > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Wilma Norton" <wilma@softcom.net> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 2:18 PM > Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census

Thanks for the info - are you satisfied with genealogylibrary - when it first came out I saw a lot of grumbling about not being able to access it, so didn't subscribe. If they've improved, maybe I'll subscribe to it. I also have ancestry.com but, like you said, it's not indexed and you have to be very patient when searching through it. I don't have DSL line, so it is very slow going. ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 11:03 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Re:1850 census > Wilma- > > I have access to the 1850 following through genealogylibrary.com: >

What state/county is covered in your 1850 census? ----- Original Message ----- From: JYG <jyg@kc.rr.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 10:47 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Two Thomases/ Two Elinors

I am inclined to agree with Brownie, but I do have questions. I know Giles and Lawrence jare adjoining counties and the census taker might not have known just where the boundary was, but would there have been that much discrepancy in the ages given. Also there is a child Homer in one family and three more children named in the other. It just looks a little odd when you start comparing these differences between the two listings. Helen ----- Original Message ----- From: "Brownie MacKie" <BMacKie1@compuserve.com> To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 8:21 AM Subject: Re: [YOUNGER] Two Thomases/ Two Elinors > Same family. Two different census dates, two different kids giving the > information, and two different census takers......can you imagine how hard > it must have been to do the census before computers? Door to > door...boundaries changing...dumb census takers who didn't know what their > boundaries were. Etc. They also took the census from anybody in the house > who was willing to give information. > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "JYG" <jyg@kc.rr.com> > To: <YOUNGER-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 1:08 AM > Subject: [YOUNGER] Two Thomases/ Two Elinors > > > > > > Can someone tell me where these belong? Thankyou... > > > > -1850 TN Giles County, District 14 (345) > > 53/53 5 Oct > > Thomas Younger 60 m none NC > > Ellender 45 f TN > > Parks 18 m none KY at school > > Mary 15 f KY at school > > Nancy 13 f KY at school > > Thomas 11 m KY at school > > Homer 9 m KY at school > > > > -1850 TN Lawrence County, District 8 (323) > > 475/475 9 Oct > > Thos. Younger 59 m millwright $100 NC > > Elinor 46 f NC > > Parks 17 m laborer KY > > Mary 13 f KY > > Nancy 9 f KY at school > > Thos. 7 m KY at school > > Lucy J. 6 f KY at school > > John L. 4 m KY > > Newton C. 2 m TN > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto > www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me > know.) > > > > ============================== > > Join the RootsWeb WorldConnect Project: > > Linking the world, one GEDCOM at a time. > > http://worldconnect.rootsweb.com > > > > > > > > ==== YOUNGER Mailing List ==== > For a place To Store and show pictures of your ancesters, goto www.ancientfaces.com (If anyone has a problem with this little ad, let me know.) > > ============================== > Add as many as 10 Good Years To Your Life > If you know how to reduce these risks. > http://www.thirdage.com/health/wecare/hearthealth/index.html >

Willie, I found in the FOTY book the reference to Jesse, Jr. will (WB25:488, probated 1891) wherein it says, "mentions the children of deceased son, Mary Susan and William James Younger". Would you happen to know the name of this deceased son, born/died/who married, etc.? Mary Susan (Mollie S. in 1880 census) is 12 and Wm. J. is 11, both born VA. I'd like to include them in my file but need parents for them. Thanks Wilma