Here it is - but now see how many more other families have managed to produce. Amazing! Suzanne Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 09:42:05 +0100 From: christine.willott@btopenworld.com Subject: Re: [YORKSGEN] family size To: suzannepaget@hotmail.com Send it to the list and see. Chris From: suzanne paget <suzannepaget@hotmail.com> To: christine.willott@btopenworld.com Sent: Wednesday, 25 July 2012, 9:14 Subject: RE: [YORKSGEN] family size Interesting question Chris.Would twelve children be considered a high number (1835-1853)?There were eight boys and four girls.Suzanne. > Date: Wed, 25 Jul 2012 07:24:21 +0100 > From: christine.willott@btopenworld.com > To: YORKSGEN-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: [YORKSGEN] family size > > The list is rather quiet at present so on the way back from the Wakefield archives yesterday, we decided to suggest a competition. Family sizes in the past were large so who has got the family with the most children to any one set of parents? Step families are excluded. Then we thought who had the most girls in a family and who had the most boys? > > Chris > ..... > Ancestors in Yorkshire? http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/YKS/index.html; > www.ryedalefamilyhistory.org; www.wharfedalefhg.org.uk; > www.yorkshireparishregisters.com; www.yorkshireroots.org.uk; > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YORKSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message