PRs prior to 1627 seem to be missing. Sometime between 1600 and 1630 there appears to be at least four possible family heads. They are William (well documented), Robert, John, and James(appears to be documented). However, the key to all the APPLETONS that seem to be moving in between the same places and in some cases acting as if they were related, is who are their parents and are they related?? Does any one have any documentation to prove it one way or another. Hints could be in wills or other documents one might have. It would be nice to solve this question... Thanks Doug Appleton SEARCHING: Appleton, Bate, Downey, Flintoff, Harker, Hunter, Kilvington, Lang, Maidens, Nodding, Smith, Weighell, Wilkinson Biggs, Bolton, Hood, Lofthouse (Loftus, Loftos), Smith, Snowball
Doug, Unfortunately, the extracts of personal names from wills on my site don't yet have many for the early 17c, but if you do a search at http://www.davekinggenealogy.co.uk/ for Appleton, there may be some of interest to you Dave > On 9 Jan 2016, at 01:53, Doug via <yorksgen@rootsweb.com> wrote: > > PRs prior to 1627 seem to be missing. Sometime between 1600 and 1630 > there appears to be > at least four possible family heads. They are William (well > documented), Robert, John, and > James(appears to be documented). However, the key to all the > APPLETONS that seem to be > moving in between the same places and in some cases acting as if they > were related, is > who are their parents and are they related?? Does any one have any > documentation to prove > it one way or another. Hints could be in wills or other documents one > might have. It would > be nice to solve this question... > > Thanks > > > > > > Doug Appleton > > SEARCHING: > Appleton, Bate, Downey, Flintoff, Harker, Hunter, Kilvington, Lang, > Maidens, Nodding, Smith, Weighell, Wilkinson > > Biggs, Bolton, Hood, Lofthouse (Loftus, Loftos), Smith, Snowball > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to YORKSGEN-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message