There's a major project on FTDNA (one of the top ten surnames in the US in terms of frequency), who does not subgroup his members, at all, even by haplogroup. He only subgroups a member if *the member* tells him what group he belongs in or that a group needs to be created. How's that for a "passive" management style?! Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: y-dna-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:y-dna-projects- > bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of RT > Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2010 12:53 AM > To: y-dna-projects@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [Y-DNA-projects] keeping projects updated > > Of course one huge irritant regarding 'poorly managed projects' is that results appearing > in the FTDNA Results page which clearly belong in one of the already-established > categories may not be moved there for months, or ever > > Richard Thrift >