If L21 isn't listed among the SNP test results for K9HKQ, then it wasn't tested, at least not successfully. You need to bug FTDNA to run the test. On the client's member page, the SNP test results are listed on the Haplotree tab in simple alpha-numeric order, which has no relationship to their position on the haplotree. IOW, the order they are listed is of no genetic or genealogical significance. What matters is which ones were positive and which ones were negative. When the L21 test is run, he will almost certain be positive for L21, and with matches at the level of 65/67 and 66/67, I wouldn't doubt that they have a near common ancestor. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: y-dna-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com On Behalf Of Karen Johnson > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:17 PM > To: y-dna-projects@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [Y-DNA-projects] Two Questions (Diana Gale Matthiesen) > > Diana, > > Yes all three were recently done, 2 in 1 batch, and the 3rd in the > following batch. > > K9HKQ (Alan) sent me a screen shot of his results. They > checked a total of 22 SNP's. FT had trouble with some of them > and re-did them. L21 is not listed as one of the SNP's tested > but the three following it are listed as negative. > > None of these three men can prove a relationship on paper, > but were hoping to be able to prove it with DNA. > > Karen >
For those who do test L21+, please join the R-L21Plus project. http://www.familytreedna.com/group-join-request.aspx?group=R-L21Plus There are a number of researchers using the data from this project. There is an on-going effort to determine the origin and expansion of R-L21 (R1b1b2a1b5 in FTDNA terminology). Regards, Mike ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Diana Gale Matthiesen <DianaGM@dgmweb.net> Date: Sat, Jun 19, 2010 at 2:17 PM Subject: Re: [Y-DNA-projects] Two Questions (Diana Gale Matthiesen) To: y-dna-projects@rootsweb.com If L21 isn't listed among the SNP test results for K9HKQ, then it wasn't tested, at least not successfully. You need to bug FTDNA to run the test. On the client's member page, the SNP test results are listed on the Haplotree tab in simple alpha-numeric order, which has no relationship to their position on the haplotree. IOW, the order they are listed is of no genetic or genealogical significance. What matters is which ones were positive and which ones were negative. When the L21 test is run, he will almost certain be positive for L21, and with matches at the level of 65/67 and 66/67, I wouldn't doubt that they have a near common ancestor. Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: y-dna-projects-bounces@rootsweb.com On Behalf Of Karen Johnson > Sent: Saturday, June 19, 2010 12:17 PM > To: y-dna-projects@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [Y-DNA-projects] Two Questions (Diana Gale Matthiesen) > > Diana, > > Yes all three were recently done, 2 in 1 batch, and the 3rd in the > following batch. > > K9HKQ (Alan) sent me a screen shot of his results. They > checked a total of 22 SNP's. FT had trouble with some of them > and re-did them. L21 is not listed as one of the SNP's tested > but the three following it are listed as negative. > > None of these three men can prove a relationship on paper, > but were hoping to be able to prove it with DNA. > > Karen > ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-PROJECTS-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message