Wil, Thanks for catching the M26+ and M26- for Mr. Gonzalez. When he joined the I2a Project we noticed that he had a M26- which we didn't believe based on his 67 markers. We contacted FTDNA and they agreed to retest M26, and the result was M26+. He has also tested L160+ which is below M26 on the tree, and other Gonzalezes with ancestry from the same area in Mexico who are believed to be related have also tested M226+. So I am confident that he is M26+. I don't have an opinion about whether FTDNA should remove the earlier M26- result from his records. Bernie On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Wilfred Husted <wmhusted@hotmail.com>wrote: > Howdy Bernie, > > Before I forget (always highly possible), check Gonzalez N9196 on the I2a > chart and see if he shows both M26+ and M26-. > > Thanks for snagging the Puerto Rican ancestry fellow to test Z106. I shall > await his result with bated breath! > > Wil. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernie Cullen > Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:36 AM > To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Any bites? (SNPs below Z106 in the I-M26 group) > > Thanks for reminding me Wil. A likely Z106+ person with paternal ancestry > from Puerto Rico has agreed to test Z106 as a first step. If he is Z106+ we > will ask him to test Z110, Z117, Z128 and Z129. (You were negative for all > four, and so were two other Z106+ people). > > Because these 4 SNPs were discovered in two Z106+ people from Puerto Rico, > maybe he has a better chance of being derived (positive) for some of these. > I will work on finding others to test these. > > Bernie > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > -- ---I read every email but I'm not always able to respond immediately. If you think you've been waiting too long for a reply, please, email me again at berniecullen@gmail.com--
should be: other Gonzalezes have tested M26+ On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Bernie Cullen <berniecullen@gmail.com>wrote: > Wil, > > Thanks for catching the M26+ and M26- for Mr. Gonzalez. When he joined the > I2a Project we noticed that he had a M26- which we didn't believe based on > his 67 markers. We contacted FTDNA and they agreed to retest M26, and the > result was M26+. He has also tested L160+ which is below M26 on the tree, > and other Gonzalezes with ancestry from the same area in Mexico who are > believed to be related have also tested M226+. So I am confident that he is > M26+. I don't have an opinion about whether FTDNA should remove the earlier > M26- result from his records. > > Bernie > > > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:21 PM, Wilfred Husted <wmhusted@hotmail.com>wrote: > >> Howdy Bernie, >> >> Before I forget (always highly possible), check Gonzalez N9196 on the I2a >> chart and see if he shows both M26+ and M26-. >> >> Thanks for snagging the Puerto Rican ancestry fellow to test Z106. I shall >> await his result with bated breath! >> >> Wil. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bernie Cullen >> Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2012 8:36 AM >> To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Any bites? (SNPs below Z106 in the I-M26 group) >> >> Thanks for reminding me Wil. A likely Z106+ person with paternal ancestry >> from Puerto Rico has agreed to test Z106 as a first step. If he is Z106+ >> we >> will ask him to test Z110, Z117, Z128 and Z129. (You were negative for all >> four, and so were two other Z106+ people). >> >> Because these 4 SNPs were discovered in two Z106+ people from Puerto Rico, >> maybe he has a better chance of being derived (positive) for some of >> these. >> I will work on finding others to test these. >> >> Bernie >> >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to >> Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' >> without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >> > > > > -- > ---I read every email but I'm not always able to respond immediately. If > you think you've been waiting too long for a reply, please, email me again > at berniecullen@gmail.com-- > -- ---I read every email but I'm not always able to respond immediately. If you think you've been waiting too long for a reply, please, email me again at berniecullen@gmail.com--