How hard can it be to bump Ysearch up to 111? It is already 100, isn't it? I would also be good to fix the printable certificate PDF's to include 111. Any word when that will be done, FTDNA people? Bill Hawk -----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Nordtvedt Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 1:43 PM To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com Subject: [yDNAhgI] 38-67 vs 68-111 FTDNA should not be demanding customers do the 38-67 panel of STRs before ordering the 68-111 panel of STRs. The latter are much more informative; customers can get much more bang for their buck. And of course it goes without saying, various project and other public databases should include space for the 68-111 STRs. - - - - Kenneth Nordtvedt See "Tree for I1" and "Tree and Map for haplogroup I" as well as "I1modalities" at http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net showing my working tree for YDNA haplogroup I. These files are periodically updated as new information is obtained. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I suspect FTDNA now wants people tested elsewhere to transfer in their results: http://dgmweb.net/DNA/General/FAQs.html#transfer instead of uploading to Ysearch, so I'd be surprised if Ysearch is ever updated. I, for one, am glad to be able to encourage people to transfer in. It's makes including their results easier for us FTDNA project admins, and the clients are better off in the long run, IMO. Diana > From: Bill Hawk > Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2012 2:28 PM > > How hard can it be to bump Ysearch up to 111? It > is already 100, isn't it? I would also be good to > fix the printable certificate PDF's to include > 111. Any word when that will be done, FTDNA people? > Bill Hawk