That summarizes the situation pretty well. But "miscelaneous" in original message usage really was pointing to the multiple branches of I1xL22 that we now have, so it was pointing in the same direction. - - - - Kenneth Nordtvedt See "Tree for I1" and "Tree and Map for haplogroup I" at http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net showing my working tree for YDNA haplogroup I. These files are periodically updated as new information is obtained. -----Original Message----- From: Obed W Odom Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 8:23 AM To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] I1-T2 has a companion clade John and Stuart, My view is that you may still be "miscellaneous" but you are a lot *less* miscellaneous than you were before you were discovered to be in the Z63+ clade, just as I am a lot less miscellaneous than I was before being found to be in the Z138+/Z139+ clade.