Ken, I notice that our Johnstons are in a branch defined as: M223, P219, P220, P221, P222, P223, L34, L36, L59, L622, L800, L1196, Z77, L1316 Any idea why the SNPs L1290 and L1317 do not appear anywhere (at least that I've been able to find)? These 2 SNPs were in Chirstopher Johnston's WTY test - new SNPs. When did Z77 appear? I may have lost track of it, but I don't seem to recall it. Thanks, Cliff. ________________________________
-----Original Message----- From: Cliff. Johnston Sent: Friday, December 28, 2012 6:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] FTDNA Y-tree draft Ken, I notice that our Johnstons are in a branch defined as: M223, P219, P220, P221, P222, P223, L34, L36, L59, L622, L800, L1196, Z77, L1316 Any idea why the SNPs L1290 and L1317 do not appear anywhere (at least that I've been able to find)? These 2 SNPs were in Chirstopher Johnston's WTY test - new SNPs. When did Z77 appear? I may have lost track of it, but I don't seem to recall it. Thanks, Cliff. I have nothing to do with the M223 Project classifications or those by FTDNA. In my own database the Johnstons are in the L1290+ subhaplogroup / clade Cont-1216 branch line location. See "Tree for M223+ Z161+" at link below. - - - - Kenneth Nordtvedt See: "Tree for I1xL22xZ58" "Tree for I1 Z58+" "Tree for I1d L22+" "Tree for M223 x Z161" "Tree for M223+ Z161+" "Tree and Map for haplogroup I" "The I1 modalities" "The M223+ Modalities" at http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net These files are periodically updated as new information is obtained.
Cliff, They do appear further down that M223 branch you listed in the FTDNA draft Y-tree. On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Cliff. Johnston <[email protected]>wrote: > Ken, > > I notice that our Johnstons are in a branch defined as: > > M223, P219, P220, P221, P222, P223, L34, L36, L59, L622, L800, L1196, Z77, > L1316 > > Any idea why the SNPs L1290 and L1317 do not appear anywhere (at least > that I've > been able to find)? These 2 SNPs were in Chirstopher Johnston's WTY test > - new > SNPs. > Z77 was found to be phyloequivilent with M223 and those other SNPs some > time back.