Food for thought, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/years-old-uk-footprints/story-fn3dxix6-1226821085299 Patrick Holland.

I love it when science can't agree. Don't these people compare notes? Theory One states 800,000 years ago at least five humanoids were walking in estuary mud (I had to look it up, that's an area where the tidal waters of a sea meet the mouth of a river) looking for food and left footprints, in tidal mud, that didn't wash away, until they were recently uncovered, recorded, and subsequently--washed away. Wow! What are the odds? Theory Two states 800,000 years ago sea level was a whopping 225 feet lower. That's 75 meters for those UK scientists who think they found footprints in tidal mud. Here's a link to the supporting data: http://www.carbonvirgin.com/content/show/popup/url/ice_d9 Somebody's theory is wrong. Since neither theory appears credible, I'll suggest a third equally credible theory. Evidence now suggests these foot prints were left in the mud during the rainy season on a high hill 75 meters above sea-level overlooking the ocean by five biped alien scientists surveying the planet as a possible future site for a 800,000-year-long experiment on the bipedal evolution of primates. If the evidence holds up against scrutiny, then the age old question of 'are we alone?' has been answered. And the best part, that experiment is due to conclude any year now plus or minus a conservative .001 percent dating error or 800 years so keep a look out for those alien scientists to return, if they haven't already. Thanks for the link to a good laugh and for providing an idea for my next science fiction novel. -----Original Message----- From: patrick holland [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, February 07, 2014 9:52 AM To: [email protected] Subject: [yDNAhgI] 800,000 years old foot prints found in England Food for thought, http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/years-old-uk-footprints/story-fn3dxix6-1226821085299 Patrick Holland.

800,000 years old in Europe and in England, respectively, is surely very interesting - from paleoanthropological sight. But: These humans were NOT of haplogroup I. Yes, there are many most interesting articles and remarkable finds each day, week, month. But I ask you to stay to our hg I topics (thanks, Aaron ...)! We cannot discuss all those off-topic finds here, it quickly will cause an informational overflow in the group traffic then. Please found a new group to discuss, if there shouldn't be any. But not here, please. Thanks. Best regards. Jürgen -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [yDNAhgI] 800,000 years old foot prints found in England From: patrick holland <[email protected]> To: [email protected] Date: Freitag, 7. Februar 2014 15:52:04 > Food for thought, > > http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/latest-news/years-old-uk-footprints/story-fn3dxix6-1226821085299 > > Patrick Holland. > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >