Hello ​Bill the last correspondence I sent you on May 1st included this tree: On 1 May 2014 18:06, I'm pretty certain #3662036 S6346 is right next to L22, you are negative [just upstream] so the tree looks like it goes: DF29/S438 -> CTS6364 -> CTS10028 -> ARCHERD \ #147 S6346 [or could be just down from L22] \ L22/S142 subbranch -> \ -> CTS11651 the big Norse subbranch [P109, L69, Z74 etc] -> \ -> S19986 subbranch -> \ -> S4744 subbranch [L300 etc] -> #147 is negative for S142 [L22] so must be between you and L22/S142 Did you read the analysis I included ? I never heard back from you. William Hartley I1-M253, Z140 Projects On 23 May 2014 01:40, <y-dna-haplogroup-i-request@rootsweb.com> wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "G. Magoon" <gregm4584@gmail.com> > To: y-dna-haplogroup-i <y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com> > Cc: > Date: Thu, 22 May 2014 20:28:19 -0400 > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Brick Wall at CTS6364+ > S6346 and CTS10028 should be downstream of CTS6364 based on Personal Genome > Project results for PGP5 (Kirk Maxey) who appears to be CTS6364+ S6346- and > CTS10028- > > I may be stating the obvious here, but, this, in conjunction with the > Chromo2 result that Ken mentions and the Archerd FGC results, suggests the > following sequence: > CTS6364 > CTS10028 > S6346 > L22 >