RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. Re: [yDNAhgI] Am I in error regarding RASEY-RAZEE non-match?
    2. Robert May
    3. Dianna I don't see anything wrong on your page or your conclusions. With SNP tests like that I don't see how they could be related in modern times. Your correspondent leaves a lot to be desired in his approach. The paternal trees I believe are up to the tester whether they are visible or not. Anyway why would you need a tree with those DNA results? BobDNA Projects I2b L415, I2c L596 HG & Tyler Surname and ISOGG YTree > > the two families to each other: > > http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rasey/RaseyDNA-results.html > > > > If I'm wrong about the two families not being connected in genealogical > > time, then I want to correct my error, though I'm baffled that he > > complains > > I don't give lineages. They're right there on the page (scroll to far > > right). > > > > This is the message: > > > > > From: David Harden [mailto:hrdndv@hotmail.com] > > > Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2014 4:16 PM > > > To: DianaGM@dgmweb.net > > > Subject: Rasey Y-DNA Surname Project > > > > > > This is a complaint that you are not putting correct > > > information on your site. I am PhD Biologist specializing > > > in speciation. I know DNA. When you get an individual > > > representing Joseph Rasey and Mary Hollan you must present > > > the paternal lineage so it can be checked. There are many > > > people out there that have erroneous lineages. There are > > > also many family children lists that are linked to the > > > wrong parent. Quite often a male child born to the mother’s > > > first husband will adopt the surname of the second husband. > > > These problems cannot be examined when you do not give the > > > full male lineage. Your conclusion that Joseph Rasey who > > > married Mary Hollan is not related to the other Joseph > > > Rasey is bogus. You do not know this. If you did not mean > > > to say this in the results page then you should correct it. > > > You present y-DNA results in an amateurish unprofessional > > > way. You need to go back to school and learn what you are > > > doing. > > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    06/08/2014 09:02:50
    1. Re: [yDNAhgI] Am I in error regarding RASEY-RAZEE non-match?
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen
    3. My sole reason for using Y-DNA testing is as a tool to support or debunk paper genealogy. For that, I need the paper genealogy. Diana > From: Robert May > Sent: Sunday, June 08, 2014 1:03 AM > To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Am I in error regarding RASEY-RAZEE non-match? > > Dianna > I don't see anything wrong on your page or your conclusions. With SNP tests > like that I don't see how they could be related in modern times. > Your correspondent leaves a lot to be desired in his approach. > > The paternal trees I believe are up to the tester whether they are visible or > not. Anyway why would you need a tree with those DNA results?

    06/07/2014 07:50:45