> Yes, Diana. I likewise do not understand why so few, if any, DF29- have > elected to do the Big Y test? It seems that would be a reasonable shot at > finding something noteworthy. Are there any DF29- Big Y out there that > anyone knows of? > > On another note, I received the first panel of a results from a new kit two weeks ahead of schedule. Perhaps delays depend on the testing ordered > > We already know that L1439 is upstream of CTS6364, so while finding out a > Z63 is > L1439+ will provide needed support for that position, it still leaves us > not > knowing whether L1439 is upstream or equivalent to DF29. Currently, the > only > way I know of to find that out is to test a Z131. > > I agree that, in general, this is no time to be doing a la carte SNP > testing, > and those taking the BigY shouldn't be doing any, at all. But as far as I > know, > none of the Z131's is taking the BigY, so we need one to take L1439 a la > carte. > > Right now, we have a Z63, a Z131, and an I2 testing L1439 (Thank you all!). > Until we have those results, I don't see the need for anyone else to test > L1439. > > > >