Of the 23 I-M223 members that tested individually for L380 with FTDNA, all were reported as ancestral (-). Only Rasey is reported as L380 derived (+) from WTY test. Diana, I have noticed today that your two Rasey members in the I-M223 Project along with their whole clade have been moved by Aaron to the Cont2b sector of the Project's results page. On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 9:33 AM, Kenneth Nordtvedt <[email protected]>wrote: > I'm afraid everyone is AA for L380. Whether that is technically ancestral > or derived is of secondary importance it seems; it could have mutated > somewhere upstream in the tree rendering IJK as well as R haplogroups as > derived AA. > > > > Kenneth Nordtvedt > > Haplogroup I Clade Modalities and Trees at: > http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: JB MCCRUMMEN > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 12:53 PM > To: YDNA I_ROOTSWEB LIST > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > In previous post, Diana mentioned a missing derived GENO 2.0 result > (L380+) in the Project I conversion by FTDNA. I checked the FTDNA GENO > 2.0 conversion for my results and L380+ is also missing in the FTDNA > conversion table. > > My GENO 2.0 L380 reading is derived ( AA and ISOGG/Krahn Browser > confirms this is derived). > > Two Questions: > 1- Are there other GENO 2.0 participants whose readings (L380 and other > SNPs) missing and/or not accurately converted? > 2- Are there other GENO 2.0 SNP readings missing and/or not accurately > converted? > > > JB MCCRUMMEN > > FTDNA KIT: 75432 > > --------------- > Previous posting from Diana: > > From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <[email protected]> > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Rasey I2 > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:04:28 -0500 > > > Well, duhhh. I could just go look at the ISOGG tree, so I did. > > Given that he's Z78-, it does surprise me that he's also CTS6433-. But I > guess > what does surprise me is that his L380+ is still not on the page, even > at the > bottom as a private SNP. > > My first impulse is to order CTS1977 and L1290, but I'm wondering if I > shouldn't > just pop for the BigY, instead of this drip, drip, drip ordering of a la > carte > SNPs. > > Diana > > ----------------- > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without > the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' > without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

> From: Wayne R. Roberts > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 7:25 PM > To: y-dna-haplogroup-i > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > Of the 23 I-M223 members that tested individually for L380 with FTDNA, all > were reported as ancestral (-). Only Rasey is reported as L380 derived (+) > from WTY test. > > Diana, I have noticed today that your two Rasey members in the I-M223 > Project along with their whole clade have been moved by Aaron to the Cont2b > sector of the Project's results page. Yes, my site is out-of-date with regard to haplotype clusters. Updating them is on my "to do" list. Dina