John, I am confused as to how I got a file of snps (I believe they are from your full genome) which were alleged to be phyloequivalent to M423/L161/L178. Did you send it, or did I try to make it from having your full genome? The problem I have with me making that list is I don't know which upstream or downstream full genomes there are to compare you with so as to isolate the M423 phyloequivalents? Anyway, I sent it to the 8000 year old bone people, and they were able to read and returned status for many of your snps. For Motala3 man some were derived, some ancestral. Same for Lorschbour man. Motala 2 and Motala 9 men were ancestral for all of your snps on "your" list, but I had suspected both these guys were from elsewhere in haplogroup I already. They are still not pinned down, but I think we can learn more about those two as well. Kenneth Nordtvedt Haplogroup I Clade Modalities and Trees at: http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net -----Original Message----- From: John O'Grady Sent: Saturday, January 11, 2014 10:37 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Chromo2 and Hg I Full Genomes doesn't cover the high S SNPs such as S7725, because Wilson hasn't published the positions. My G- for PF6143 agrees with the majority CC- (reverse strand), so PF6143 could split Isles-D. My T+ for PF2642 matches AA+ (reverse strand). I guess we will have to wait for more results. John O'Grady ---------------------------------------- > > Since you have the other D2 Isles raw data, you can see first hand the > clash > between you two. Looking at all 9 I can only add: > > Everyone is CC- for PF6143 except Woods who shows AA+ > > PF2642 is a misbehaving snp, showing AA for a I1 person, GG- for most > everyone, but AG for Woods. > > How about S7725? Are you in agreement with Woods on that snp? > > Kenneth Nordtvedt ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

Ken, I sent you the list that I extracted from my Full Genomes results. I can send you a list of additional M423 phyloequivalents, including indels, if you are interested. John O'Grady > > John, I am confused as to how I got a file of snps (I believe they are from > your full genome) which were alleged to be phyloequivalent to > M423/L161/L178. Did you send it, or did I try to make it from having your > full genome? > > The problem I have with me making that list is I don't know which upstream > or downstream full genomes there are to compare you with so as to isolate > the M423 phyloequivalents? > > Anyway, I sent it to the 8000 year old bone people, and they were able to > read and returned status for many of your snps. For Motala3 man some were > derived, some ancestral. Same for Lorschbour man. Motala 2 and Motala 9 > men were ancestral for all of your snps on "your" list, but I had suspected > both these guys were from elsewhere in haplogroup I already. They are still > not pinned down, but I think we can learn more about those two as well. > > Kenneth Nordtvedt