Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Home

Results for list 'y-dna-haplogroup-i'

Total: 3/3
    1. Re: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen

    3. I'm afraid I wasn't talking about it missing from a Geno 2.0 conversion, I said it was missing from the ISOGG Hg I Haplotree page. L380+ was found on a WTY and, so far, it appears to be Private for my RASEY #69631. It's negative for my RAZEE #70816: #70816 RAZEE I2-L801+ > Z78+ > L1198+ [L380-] #69631 RASEY I2-L801+ > L380+ [Z78-] http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rasey/RaseyDNA-results.html Diana > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:y-dna-haplogroup-i- > [email protected]] On Behalf Of JB MCCRUMMEN > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 2:53 PM > To: YDNA I_ROOTSWEB LIST > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > In previous post, Diana mentioned a missing derived GENO 2.0 result > (L380+) in the Project I conversion by FTDNA. I checked the FTDNA GENO > 2.0 conversion for my results and L380+ is also missing in the FTDNA > conversion table. > > My GENO 2.0 L380 reading is derived ( AA and ISOGG/Krahn Browser > confirms this is derived). > > Two Questions: > 1- Are there other GENO 2.0 participants whose readings (L380 and other > SNPs) missing and/or not accurately converted? > 2- Are there other GENO 2.0 SNP readings missing and/or not accurately > converted? > > > JB MCCRUMMEN > > FTDNA KIT: 75432 > > --------------- > Previous posting from Diana: > > From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <[email protected]> > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Rasey I2 > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:04:28 -0500 > > > Well, duhhh. I could just go look at the ISOGG tree, so I did. > > Given that he's Z78-, it does surprise me that he's also CTS6433-. But I > guess > what does surprise me is that his L380+ is still not on the page, even > at the > bottom as a private SNP. > > My first impulse is to order CTS1977 and L1290, but I'm wondering if I > shouldn't > just pop for the BigY, instead of this drip, drip, drip ordering of a la > carte > SNPs. > > Diana > > ----------------- > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I- > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > subject and the body of the message

    01/03/2014 08:22:56
    1. Re: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion
    2. Diana Gale Matthiesen

    3. I misspoke. L380+ was found on my RASEY's WTY, but it was not a new SNP at the time. The new SNP found on his WTY was L801. > From: Diana Gale Matthiesen > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 3:23 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > I'm afraid I wasn't talking about it missing from a Geno 2.0 conversion, I > said > it was missing from the ISOGG Hg I Haplotree page. > > L380+ was found on a WTY and, so far, it appears to be Private for my RASEY > #69631. It's negative for my RAZEE #70816: > > #70816 RAZEE I2-L801+ > Z78+ > L1198+ [L380-] > > #69631 RASEY I2-L801+ > L380+ [Z78-] > > http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rasey/RaseyDNA-results.html > > Diana > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:y-dna-haplogroup-i- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of JB MCCRUMMEN > > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 2:53 PM > > To: YDNA I_ROOTSWEB LIST > > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > > > In previous post, Diana mentioned a missing derived GENO 2.0 result > > (L380+) in the Project I conversion by FTDNA. I checked the FTDNA GENO > > 2.0 conversion for my results and L380+ is also missing in the FTDNA > > conversion table. > > > > My GENO 2.0 L380 reading is derived ( AA and ISOGG/Krahn Browser > > confirms this is derived). > > > > Two Questions: > > 1- Are there other GENO 2.0 participants whose readings (L380 and other > > SNPs) missing and/or not accurately converted? > > 2- Are there other GENO 2.0 SNP readings missing and/or not accurately > > converted? > > > > > > JB MCCRUMMEN > > > > FTDNA KIT: 75432 > > > > --------------- > > Previous posting from Diana: > > > > From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <[email protected]> > > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Rasey I2 > > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:04:28 -0500 > > > > > > Well, duhhh. I could just go look at the ISOGG tree, so I did. > > > > Given that he's Z78-, it does surprise me that he's also CTS6433-. But I > > guess > > what does surprise me is that his L380+ is still not on the page, even > > at the > > bottom as a private SNP. > > > > My first impulse is to order CTS1977 and L1290, but I'm wondering if I > > shouldn't > > just pop for the BigY, instead of this drip, drip, drip ordering of a la > > carte > > SNPs. > > > > Diana > >

    01/03/2014 08:35:05
    1. Re: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion
    2. Haakon Styri

    3. In case some of you have forgotten, L380 is an unreliable SNP. If I remember correct, it showed up in I1 at about the same time as it showed up in I2. That was in 2011. Some time before that, in 2010 i think it was, it showed up somewhere in haplogroup R1b. Regards, H. Styri > From: Diana Gale Matthiesen [[email protected]] > Sent: 2014-01-03 21:22:56 CET > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > I'm afraid I wasn't talking about it missing from a Geno 2.0 conversion, I said > it was missing from the ISOGG Hg I Haplotree page. > > L380+ was found on a WTY and, so far, it appears to be Private for my RASEY > #69631. It's negative for my RAZEE #70816: > > #70816 RAZEE I2-L801+ > Z78+ > L1198+ [L380-] > > #69631 RASEY I2-L801+ > L380+ [Z78-] > > http://dgmweb.net/DNA/Rasey/RaseyDNA-results.html > > Diana > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:y-dna-haplogroup-i- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of JB MCCRUMMEN > > Sent: Friday, January 03, 2014 2:53 PM > > To: YDNA I_ROOTSWEB LIST > > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Missing GENO 2.0 Results in FTDNA Conversion > > > > In previous post, Diana mentioned a missing derived GENO 2.0 result > > (L380+) in the Project I conversion by FTDNA. I checked the FTDNA GENO > > 2.0 conversion for my results and L380+ is also missing in the FTDNA > > conversion table. > > > > My GENO 2.0 L380 reading is derived ( AA and ISOGG/Krahn Browser > > confirms this is derived). > > > > Two Questions: > > 1- Are there other GENO 2.0 participants whose readings (L380 and other > > SNPs) missing and/or not accurately converted? > > 2- Are there other GENO 2.0 SNP readings missing and/or not accurately > > converted? > > > > > > JB MCCRUMMEN > > > > FTDNA KIT: 75432 > > > > --------------- > > Previous posting from Diana: > > > > From: "Diana Gale Matthiesen" <[email protected]> > > Subject: [yDNAhgI] Rasey I2 > > Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 10:04:28 -0500 > > > > > > Well, duhhh. I could just go look at the ISOGG tree, so I did. > > > > Given that he's Z78-, it does surprise me that he's also CTS6433-. But I > > guess > > what does surprise me is that his L380+ is still not on the page, even > > at the > > bottom as a private SNP. > > > > My first impulse is to order CTS1977 and L1290, but I'm wondering if I > > shouldn't > > just pop for the BigY, instead of this drip, drip, drip ordering of a la > > carte > > SNPs. > > > > Diana > > > > ----------------- > > > > > > ------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I- > > [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the > > subject and the body of the message > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    01/03/2014 05:15:31