I show Driver M227 = GG+ and also L69+, but one always worries about strand issues with multiple labs now supplying results. **************************** Yes, we need to find out why they are placing M227 upstream from L69.1, but I'm not sure where to go to get that information. I assume that whoever is responsible for the Tree may has results from Full Genomes that we haven't yet seen. And they must have something for CTS8582, too, although I haven't been able to find anyone who is positive. Lindsey

You are being kind to authors of that tree. Kenneth Nordtvedt Haplogroup I Clade Modalities and Trees at: http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth Britton Sent: Monday, January 20, 2014 11:12 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] Position of M227 in Tree I show Driver M227 = GG+ and also L69+, but one always worries about strand issues with multiple labs now supplying results. **************************** Yes, we need to find out why they are placing M227 upstream from L69.1, but I'm not sure where to go to get that information. I assume that whoever is responsible for the Tree may has results from Full Genomes that we haven't yet seen. And they must have something for CTS8582, too, although I haven't been able to find anyone who is positive. Lindsey ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I just had this exchange with Phil Goff: John, I'm out of town but will check when I return home. I know one SNP we evaluated recently was lacking required evidence. It might have been this one as I think it involved lack of testing by M227 men. I will verify. Thanks, Phil Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone -------- Original message -------- From: John M Rhodes Date:01/18/2014 1:51 PM (GMT-05:00) To: [email protected] Subject: L69 Hello Phil, I just found the January 6, 2014 update for the I-haplogroup ISOGG tree. It still does not include L69 below CTS6364 and above M227. John M Rhodes John M Rhodes On 2014-01-20, at 1:12 PM, Elizabeth Britton <[email protected]> wrote: > > I show Driver M227 = GG+ and also L69+, but one always worries about strand > issues with multiple labs now supplying results. > > **************************** > > Yes, we need to find out why they are placing M227 upstream from L69.1, but I'm not sure where to go to get that information. I assume that whoever is responsible for the Tree may has results from Full Genomes that we haven't yet seen. And they must have something for CTS8582, too, although I haven't been able to find anyone who is positive. > > Lindsey > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message