I'm wondering why you picked Collier to compare to? Anyway, looking at 7 chromo2 results side by side: cts927 and cts1414 are broken or inconsistent snps on chromo2 according to my chromo2 results: CTS3084 is negative GG and CTS5730 is negative CC for Collier so why are you calling them positive for Collier according to chromo2? For the following I see some strand clashes or errors in the pos/neg calls. Chromo2 has: CTS5139 is TT positive for everyone in haplogroup I CTS5248 is AA positive for everyone in haplogroup I and similarly for all the rest of the snps you listed they are positive for everyone in haplogroup I (I can give alleles if you want but you must have them as they match Collier) All positive or negative calls are not mine, but chromo2 lab staff. They have been silent for a couple weeks, so I don't know if they are correcting stuff or what? Kenneth Nordtvedt Haplogroup I Clade Modalities and Trees at: http://knordtvedt.home.bresnan.net -----Original Message----- From: John O'Grady Sent: Tuesday, January 07, 2014 5:29 PM To: [email protected] Subject: [yDNAhgI] Chromo2 L161 comparison Ken, I compared Collier's Chromo2 results with my Full Genomes results. I found the following SNPs for which Collier is positive and I am negative: CTS10008 CTS11575 CTS1414 CTS3084 CTS3844 CTS5139 CTS5248 CTS5730 CTS927 PF1252 John O'Grady ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

I picked Collier because I was looking for SNPs downstream of L161. This is embarrassing. I knew I had to look at the alleles but somehow I overlooked that step. Anyway, there is one real difference: CTS3844 Collier GG O'Grady AA Full Genomes and Thomas Krahn's browser both say that CTS3844 is A to G. If everyone else in haplogroup I is GG, then maybe I have a new SNP downstream of L161. John O'Grady ---------------------------------------- > I'm wondering why you picked Collier to compare to? Anyway, looking at 7 > chromo2 results side by side: > > cts927 and cts1414 are broken or inconsistent snps on chromo2 > > according to my chromo2 results: > CTS3084 is negative GG and CTS5730 is negative CC for Collier > so why are you calling them positive for Collier according to chromo2? > > For the following I see some strand clashes or errors in the pos/neg calls. > Chromo2 has: > CTS5139 is TT positive for everyone in haplogroup I > CTS5248 is AA positive for everyone in haplogroup I > and similarly for all the rest of the snps you listed they are positive for > everyone in haplogroup I (I can give alleles if you want but you must have > them as they match Collier) > > All positive or negative calls are not mine, but chromo2 lab staff. They > have been silent for a couple weeks, so I don't know if they are correcting > stuff or what? > > Kenneth Nordtvedt