I love colorization, especially for situations when a lot of people in a clade belong to a project, and I have such a project. We have done a fair amount of STR work on that group, and I'm sure that I will do more, but I am hoping for colorization and inclusion of advanced marker results in the ysearch database to help with that. I think that we are to some extent going through a first phase of using more whole genome sequence data to learn about SNPs and there is some catch-up to do right now. I think there will be local maxes and mins in the flow of data even as it increases, and those variations will cause us to change our balance of SNP vs. STR work from time to time. Kirsten ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <knordtvedt@bresnan.net> To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2011 3:32:13 PM Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] 68-111 over the cliff? FTDNA coloring for what purpose? I could never see any. Given the way we are adding to our snp list, we are far far away from snps being able to replace extended STR haplotypes in learning about the "time" of events in the tree. I hope that is realized in the focus to snps. -----Original Message----- From: dnalister@comcast.net I tend to rely on FTDNA's mutation colorization, and the last time I checked, it was not working for markers 68-111. I believe that is true for both public results pages and GAP results displays. Kirsten ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kenneth Nordtvedt" <knordtvedt@bresnan.net> I have noticed a strong drop in rate of haplogroup I people who are expanding haplotypes to 111 markers? Anybody have any theory why? ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message