Ken, You say : *" So, in summary, it looks like five are approximately with M253 et al., while three (L844, L846, and L847) are older."* So, do you think that this expands the geographical vista for Hg I1 (M253) AS generic ? Patrick Holland. On 11/7/2011 8:13 AM, Kenneth Nordtvedt wrote: > So, in summary, it looks like five are approximately with M253 et al., > while three (L844, L846, and L847) are older.

It suggests none of these snps will be useful to divide I1. Instead they will be either phyloequivalent to M253 or maybe even M170 which tags all of I The ancestral branch line going back from the I1 MRCA to the junction of the I1 branch line with the I2 is 16,000 years. That line should contain many snps. -----Original Message----- From: lambeth@tadaust.org.au Sent: Sunday, November 06, 2011 5:56 PM To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] L841-L848 Ken, You say : *" So, in summary, it looks like five are approximately with M253 et al., while three (L844, L846, and L847) are older."* So, do you think that this expands the geographical vista for Hg I1 (M253) AS generic ? Patrick Holland. On 11/7/2011 8:13 AM, Kenneth Nordtvedt wrote: > So, in summary, it looks like five are approximately with M253 et al., > while three (L844, L846, and L847) are older. ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

-----Original Message----- From: Kenneth Nordtvedt Ken, You say : *" So, in summary, it looks like five are approximately with M253 et al., while three (L844, L846, and L847) are older."* [[Actually, I am not the author of the above. These blasted email chopping systems have screwed up things --- someone else said that to me. KN ]]