RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [yDNAhgI] [DNA] SNP's overlooked in WTY?
    2. Haakon Styri
    3. As L380 was announced as a "breakthrough SNP" to the M223 project I guess some test orders have been placed already. We'll at least find out whether L380 is useful or not. H. Styri > From: John O'Grady [john_ogrady@hotmail.com] > Sent: 2011-11-13 23:51:39 MET > To: genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com, y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [yDNAhgI] [DNA] SNP's overlooked in WTY? > > > This is a VERY "nervous" SNP. According to Finch2, it is derived (A+) for E-M34, N-M178, R-M417, R-P312, I-M223, I-L22, L-M61, and J-P58. > > John O'Grady > > > From: knordtvedt@bresnan.net > > To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com; genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com > > Date: Sun, 13 Nov 2011 14:44:25 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [DNA] [yDNAhgI] SNP's overlooked in WTY? > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: John O'Grady > > Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 2:33 PM > > To: y-dna-haplogroup-i@rootsweb.com ; genealogy-dna@rootsweb.com > > Subject: Re: [DNA] [yDNAhgI] SNP's overlooked in WTY? > > > > > > Aaron, > > > > I read the WTY chromats on Finch2. Kit 95338 is L319-. Kit 69631 is L380+. > > > > [[This is getting interesting. L380+ is being called derived for two I1d, > > negative for 7 I1xL22, negative in I2*, negative in M26+ and Dinaric, > > negative in a L623+ part of M223+ > > > > I wonder if there was a switch in the calling rule for derived at some point > > in the lab? Is A+ derived in all instances? KN ]] > > > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to Y-DNA-HAPLOGROUP-I-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    11/15/2011 06:41:15