There seem to be some errors in the M223+ sector of the ISOGG Y tree? They show L369 as subhaplogroup of L126 and L137. As far as I know L369 with quite a few results now still shows phyloequiv to L126 and L137. Does anyone have some knowledge to the contrary? L801+ is now a robustly tested and found subhaplogroup of M223*; it seems to take in most of the younger haplotypes of Continental 1 & 2, leaving out interesting old clades from same. I con’t see L801 in the ISOGG tree. In fact, L801+ will most probably end up with most of the previously named clades of M223* Continental 1 & 2. A piece of the old portion of Continental L801- has turned out L147+ L623+ I don’t see this downstream haplogroup either? ( I won’t even mention in any depth L812+ which seems so far to be confined to a small clade (DYS438 = 8) within the Roots clade of M223*. This can properly be called a snp still under investigation ) Ken