This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. Author: MichaelWright12 Surnames: Classification: queries Message Board URL: http://boards.rootsweb.com/surnames.wright/15354.1.1.1.1/mb.ashx Message Board Post: There is always the possibility of a NPE messing up the representation! We typically need three or more related "cousins" to take the test before we have any luck defining a modal profile and getting lucky enough to be able to tie our wagon to a proven line. In his case, I think the Wright Y-DNA group he tested as a match for are all in the same boat: not sure of any connections to Oyster Bay Wrights. I have seen George Wright (after 1684) included in the Oyster Bay Wright clan with Peter, Nicholas and Anthony, but I am almost dead certain that he was not of the same Wright family as those three brothers. He is not mentioned in their family documents, only in OB town records. There was not a single George given name in the entire known history of that Kilverstone Wright family and no record of a George Wright from Norfolk born in the early decades of the 17th century, therefore I really think that descendants tracing back to him would not be representative of the Kilverstone Wright family group but of another group entirely separate from them. But what do I know. I am not an expert on the OB Wrights or the Quakers in general, so I am just going on what I have read and seen in the English records while researching my Kelvedon Hatch Wright line. What I do know is that you can't give up searching for the answers. Best of luck to you. Mike Important Note: The author of this message may not be subscribed to this list. If you would like to reply to them, please click on the Message Board URL link above and respond on the board.