Thanks Wayne, And isn't it a little redundant when the subject line already contains Re:[WOODS-L] to put WOODS, MARY FRANCIS, b. 7 Dec 1872, unk. Why now utilize the Re: [WOODS-L] as a part of the subject line post? Could at least get more info on the subject line. Harold Williams, Rootsweb Sponsor Mesquite, TX (Dallas suburb) willhn@flash.net -----Original Message----- From: Wayne F. Seibert <wseibert@erinet.com> To: WOODS-L@rootsweb.com <WOODS-L@rootsweb.com> Date: Thursday, March 25, 1999 4:12 PM Subject: [WOODS-L] Roll Call >Does it seem unreasonable to anyone else that posting names without any >other information (like dates and locations) is a waste of everybody's time? >First I stopped looking in my files. Second I stopped reading them. Now >I'm asking people to please think the posting out before sending it. > >______________________________