Harold; Because this list is any sir name with Wood in it, as Wood, Woods, Woodall, Woodward, etc., willhn wrote: > > Thanks Wayne, > And isn't it a little redundant when the subject line > already contains Re:[WOODS-L] to put WOODS, MARY FRANCIS, b. > 7 Dec 1872, unk. Why now utilize the Re: [WOODS-L] as a > part of the subject line post? Could at least get more info > on the subject line. > Harold Williams, Rootsweb Sponsor > Mesquite, TX (Dallas suburb) > willhn@flash.net > > -----Original Message----- > From: Wayne F. Seibert <wseibert@erinet.com> > To: WOODS-L@rootsweb.com <WOODS-L@rootsweb.com> > Date: Thursday, March 25, 1999 4:12 PM > Subject: [WOODS-L] Roll Call > > >Does it seem unreasonable to anyone else that posting names > without any > >other information (like dates and locations) is a waste of > everybody's time? > >First I stopped looking in my files. Second I stopped > reading them. Now > >I'm asking people to please think the posting out before > sending it. > > > >______________________________ > > ==== WOODS Mailing List ==== > All rights including Copyrights to the messages sent to this LIST for > distribution to its subscribers remain with the original author of each > message. -- Oren M. Wood Mailto:WOODY9453@worldnet.att.net