No, How can it be? Surgeon John was born 1569. He married Sara Stanlie/Staulie in 1603, Surgeon John died in 1643. He would've been 134 yrs old in 1703. Hard to get married after you die. ---- Original Message ----- From: Steve Woodall<mailto:stevew@rbp.com> To: 'Jeff Woodall'<mailto:wjcjets@msn.com> ; woodall@rootsweb.com<mailto:woodall@rootsweb.com> ; pknowlton@verizon.net<mailto:pknowlton@verizon.net> Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:05 PM Subject: RE: [WOODALL] Your website/records Shouldn't the 1603 date be 1703? Steve Woodall President Reliant Business Products, Inc. 5757 Ranchester, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77036 Direct (713) 980-7112 Fax (713) 980-7150 Mobile (713) 725-9898 Web Site: www.rbp.com<http://www.rbp.com/> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ From: Jeff Woodall [mailto:wjcjets@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 1:19 PM To: woodall@rootsweb.com; pknowlton@verizon.net Subject: Re: [WOODALL] Your website/records Glenda, What are your sources on your Woodall research? We have spent some time looking at your website. We personally researched in the Family History Library in Salt Lake City, looking at many records including microfilm, microfiche and old books. The marriage record you referred to of a John Woodall and Sarah Stanley/Staulie actually occurred in 1603 at St Peter Cornhill in London, England. The marriage was of Barber Surgeon John Woodall and his wife Sarah. An extraction on this original record can be found on this website: http://www.familysearch.org<http://www.familysearch.org/> This primary and secondary record from St. Peter Cornhill's Parish which we personally viewed gave other details such as John's occupation, etc. The John Woodall who was born approximately 1678 give or take somewheres around 10 yrs. birth date based only on known sons ages John & William born circa 1710 who were mentioned in his 1750 WILL. His wife's name has never been found on any document. Her name is still unknown to this day. There is no sort of documentation of the identity of the father of John Woodall born approximately 1678. It is true that we do not even know where John who left his 1750 WILL was born. We as researchers of Woodall's who were originally from Virginia for many years (speaking for others such as Verna Perier, Ruth Mason, Steve Woodall & Andy Marshall) believe it is most likely that he probably was born in either MD, VA, or ENG but then there is no document to be found in any courthouse, library, bible record etc. to support this theory. The William Woodall born abt 1709 did not serve in the Revolutionary War. His 1st wife's name is unknown. No proof of her name being Mary Woodson or Mary Smith, Mary Jones or anything like it. Her name is unknown. There is no known connection between the descendants of Barber Surgeon John Woodall and any Woodall families today. Barber Surgeon's line may have died out. On the Woodall DNA Project website to this date there are 14 different DNA results. Remember Wood(h)all was a place name, which would explain most different DNA results. Also on the Woodall DNA project website DNA results will show that there were at least 2 William's in VA at the same time and there are two different Woodall Families who attended the St. James Parish In Goochland County. Read the information posted on the website which explains this If you are not familiar with this website, here is the link: http://homecfl.rr.com/woodalldna/Test%20Results.htm<http://home.cfl.rr.com/woodalldna/Test%20Results.htm> We appreciate your enthusiasm. Please correct the errors we have referenced on your website. Regards, Jeff and Cheryl Woodall
Jeff, I don't understand what you sent me means. I know that my John Woodall was the one that I sent to you. He might of been born Samuel Woodall. I am very confused on this. There is a lady in Tennessee that is suppose to be getting my e-mail address sometime this week & her maiden name is WOODALL. So when she sends me the info, I will forward it to you. I want to print it our or have it printed out. Thanks for your help. Jean Jeff Woodall wrote: >No, How can it be? > >Surgeon John was born 1569. He married Sara Stanlie/Staulie in 1603, Surgeon John died in 1643. He would've been 134 yrs old in 1703. Hard to get married after you die. > > >---- Original Message ----- > From: Steve Woodall<mailto:stevew@rbp.com> > To: 'Jeff Woodall'<mailto:wjcjets@msn.com> ; woodall@rootsweb.com<mailto:woodall@rootsweb.com> ; pknowlton@verizon.net<mailto:pknowlton@verizon.net> > Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:05 PM > Subject: RE: [WOODALL] Your website/records > > > Shouldn't the 1603 date be 1703? > > > > Steve Woodall > > President > > Reliant Business Products, Inc. > > 5757 Ranchester, Suite 1400 > > Houston, Texas 77036 > > Direct (713) 980-7112 > > Fax (713) 980-7150 > > Mobile (713) 725-9898 > > Web Site: www.rbp.com<http://www.rbp.com/> > > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > From: Jeff Woodall [mailto:wjcjets@msn.com] > Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 1:19 PM > To: woodall@rootsweb.com; pknowlton@verizon.net > Subject: Re: [WOODALL] Your website/records > > > > Glenda, > > > > What are your sources on your Woodall research? We have spent some time looking at your website. > > > > We personally researched in the Family History Library in Salt Lake City, looking at many records including microfilm, microfiche and old books. > > > > The marriage record you referred to of a John Woodall and Sarah Stanley/Staulie actually occurred in 1603 at St Peter Cornhill in London, England. The marriage was of Barber Surgeon John Woodall and his wife Sarah. An extraction on this original record can be found on this website: http://www.familysearch.org<http://www.familysearch.org/> This primary and secondary record from St. Peter Cornhill's Parish which we personally viewed gave other details such as John's occupation, etc. > > > > The John Woodall who was born approximately 1678 give or take somewheres around 10 yrs. birth date based only on known sons ages John & William born circa 1710 who were mentioned in his 1750 WILL. His wife's name has never been found on any document. Her name is still unknown to this day. There is no sort of documentation of the identity of the father of John Woodall born approximately 1678. It is true that we do not even know where John who left his 1750 WILL was born. We as researchers of Woodall's who were originally from Virginia for many years (speaking for others such as Verna Perier, Ruth Mason, Steve Woodall & Andy Marshall) believe it is most likely that he probably was born in either MD, VA, or ENG but then there is no document to be found in any courthouse, library, bible record etc. to support this theory. > > > > The William Woodall born abt 1709 did not serve in the Revolutionary War. His 1st wife's name is unknown. No proof of her name being Mary Woodson or Mary Smith, Mary Jones or anything like it. Her name is unknown. > > > > There is no known connection between the descendants of Barber Surgeon John Woodall and any Woodall families today. Barber Surgeon's line may have died out. On the Woodall DNA Project website to this date there are 14 different DNA results. Remember Wood(h)all was a place name, which would explain most different DNA results. Also on the Woodall DNA project website DNA results will show that there were at least 2 William's in VA at the same time and there are two different Woodall Families who attended the St. James Parish In Goochland County. Read the information posted on the website which explains this If you are not familiar with this website, here is the link: http://homecfl.rr.com/woodalldna/Test%20Results.htm<http://home.cfl.rr.com/woodalldna/Test%20Results.htm> > > > > We appreciate your enthusiasm. Please correct the errors we have referenced on your website. > > > > Regards, > > Jeff and Cheryl Woodall > >------------------------------- >To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WOODALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message > > > > >
You are right Steve Woodall President Reliant Business Products, Inc. 5757 Ranchester, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77036 Direct (713) 980-7112 Fax (713) 980-7150 Mobile (713) 725-9898 Web Site: <http://www.rbp.com> www.rbp.com This message is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. If you are not the intended recipient of this message you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. Email transmission cannot be guaranteed to be secure or error-free. Therefore, we do not represent that this information is complete or accurate and it should not be relied upon as such. All information is subject to change without notice. _____ From: Jeff Woodall [mailto:wjcjets@msn.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 5:09 PM To: woodall@rootsweb.com; pknowlton@verizon.net; Steve Woodall Subject: Re: [WOODALL] Your website/records No, How can it be? Surgeon John was born 1569. He married Sara Stanlie/Staulie in 1603, Surgeon John died in 1643. He would've been 134 yrs old in 1703. Hard to get married after you die. ---- Original Message ----- From: Steve <mailto:stevew@rbp.com> Woodall To: 'Jeff <mailto:wjcjets@msn.com> Woodall' ; woodall@rootsweb.com ; pknowlton@verizon.net Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:05 PM Subject: RE: [WOODALL] Your website/records Shouldn't the 1603 date be 1703? Steve Woodall President Reliant Business Products, Inc. 5757 Ranchester, Suite 1400 Houston, Texas 77036 Direct (713) 980-7112 Fax (713) 980-7150 Mobile (713) 725-9898 Web Site: <http://www.rbp.com> www.rbp.com _____ From: Jeff Woodall [mailto:wjcjets@msn.com] Sent: Tuesday, November 28, 2006 1:19 PM To: woodall@rootsweb.com; pknowlton@verizon.net Subject: Re: [WOODALL] Your website/records Glenda, What are your sources on your Woodall research? We have spent some time looking at your website. We personally researched in the Family History Library in Salt Lake City, looking at many records including microfilm, microfiche and old books. The marriage record you referred to of a John Woodall and Sarah Stanley/Staulie actually occurred in 1603 at St Peter Cornhill in London, England. The marriage was of Barber Surgeon John Woodall and his wife Sarah. An extraction on this original record can be found on this website: http://www.familysearch.org This primary and secondary record from St. Peter Cornhill's Parish which we personally viewed gave other details such as John's occupation, etc. The John Woodall who was born approximately 1678 give or take somewheres around 10 yrs. birth date based only on known sons ages John & William born circa 1710 who were mentioned in his 1750 WILL. His wife's name has never been found on any document. Her name is still unknown to this day. There is no sort of documentation of the identity of the father of John Woodall born approximately 1678. It is true that we do not even know where John who left his 1750 WILL was born. We as researchers of Woodall's who were originally from Virginia for many years (speaking for others such as Verna Perier, Ruth Mason, Steve Woodall & Andy Marshall) believe it is most likely that he probably was born in either MD, VA, or ENG but then there is no document to be found in any courthouse, library, bible record etc. to support this theory. The William Woodall born abt 1709 did not serve in the Revolutionary War. His 1st wife's name is unknown. No proof of her name being Mary Woodson or Mary Smith, Mary Jones or anything like it. Her name is unknown. There is no known connection between the descendants of Barber Surgeon John Woodall and any Woodall families today. Barber Surgeon's line may have died out. On the Woodall DNA Project website to this date there are 14 different DNA results. Remember Wood(h)all was a place name, which would explain most different DNA results. Also on the Woodall DNA project website DNA results will show that there were at least 2 William's in VA at the same time and there are two different Woodall Families who attended the St. James Parish In Goochland County. Read the information posted on the website which explains this If you are not familiar with this website, here is the link: http://homecfl.rr.com/woodalldna/Test%20Results.htm <http://home.cfl.rr.com/woodalldna/Test%20Results.htm> We appreciate your enthusiasm. Please correct the errors we have referenced on your website. Regards, Jeff and Cheryl Woodall