Dear Bob, On 15/1/05, Bob Buckland said: >Perhaps he was born before Susan & Thomas married and was registered as >THOMAS not WOOD? That is a possibility and will follow up on that by trying the first two you mention. I had tried by putting the Davies in as a middle name but with no luck. Davies had been given as a middle name to another brother and two sisters so it didn't occur to me that he may have been registered without it. >Thomas, William 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a 785 >Thomas, William 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a 805 >Thomas, William Collin 1868 March Pembroke Pembrokeshire 11a 766 >Thomas, William David 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a 793 >Thomas, William George 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a 800 I did try William David Thomas above as I thought that David may have been a mistake and should have been Davies but it turned out that he was from St. David's and the mother's name was not the right one. The father was a Thomas THOMAS though. >Could it be that she used her maiden name of DAVIES as they weren't yet >married? I thought of that and tried for the first one you mention below but it was not the right parents. >Davies, William 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a 790 >Davies, William 1868 March Pembroke Pembrokeshire 11a 752 >Davies, William Gambold 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a 783 > >Could it be that William was a middle name but the one used by the family? It could be but I don't think so. However, anything is possible after dealing with this family!!! >Davies, Frederick William 1868 March Haverfordwest Dyfed Pembrokeshire 11a >784 > >These are just the possibilities from March 1868 which is the only quarter >around that time that has been transcribed. > >Good Luck, > >Bob Once again thanks very much for your help. Gwen ------------------------------------- Gwen Fitch, g.fitch@ibl.bm