Hi everyone, I just looked at the 1871 census for William Woodcok (aka Woodcock) and have concluded that he and his wife indeed are the couple in the 1841 and 1851 census where their name has been transcribed as 'Woolcock'. It is possible that over time they changed their name. If you happen to be able to locate the 1841 and 51 census easily and can e-mail it to me, I'd appreciate it - I'd love to see them. But I'm actually writing for the 1861 census. I would really appreciate an 1861 census lookup for William and Lettice Woolcock/Woodcock/Woodcok/Woocock William would be 60 and Lettice 64. Here is what I believe are their other census records. If you can add anything to this info, I would appreciate it. I haven't seen the actual 1841 or 1851 census. I have the 1871. They both died before the 1881 census and I've tracked their grandson Joseph to 1891. We also have a letter and photographs from Joseph. 1841 Census Steynton Greenhill William Woolcock 40 ag. lab. Lettice 45 James 13 Mary 11 Celia 9 Thomas 7 Lettice 4 Jane 9 months 1851 Census Steynton William Woolcock 50 b. Rudbaxton Lettice 54 b. Moat Sarah 25 b. Steynton Thomas Woolcock 17 b. Haverfordwest St. Thomas (sisters son) - not sure about this Lettice 14 b. Steynton William 3 b. Steynton grandson 1871 Census Steynton address 28 Dreen Hill William Woodcok 70 ag. lab. St. Brides Pembrokeshire Lettice 74 Moat Pembrokeshire Joseph 12 grandson Swansea Glamorgan I noticed the similarity between the Greenhill (1841) and Dreen Hill (1871) and wonder if one of these is a mistake. Any help would be appreciated. But I'm particularly interested in the 1861 census for William and Lettice at this point. It may answer some other questions. If you are related to this family, I would like to hear from you. Thanks so much. Debbie --------------------------------- Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online