Hello Debbie I have the 1841 census - original not transcribed - and it is definitely Woolcock . Also the location is definitely Dreenhill in 1841 too. I'll get back to you on the 1861 entry. Cheers Pat In message <[email protected]>, Debbie Olsen <[email protected]> writes >Hi everyone, > >I just looked at the 1871 census for William Woodcok (aka Woodcock) and have >concluded that he and his wife indeed are the couple in the 1841 and 1851 census >where their name has been transcribed as 'Woolcock'. It is possible that over >time they changed their name. If you happen to be able to locate the 1841 and >51 census easily and can e-mail it to me, I'd appreciate it - I'd love to see >them. But I'm actually writing for the 1861 census. > >I would really appreciate an 1861 census lookup for >William and Lettice Woolcock/Woodcock/Woodcok/Woocock >William would be 60 and Lettice 64. > >Here is what I believe are their other census records. If you can add anything >to this info, I would appreciate it. I haven't seen the actual 1841 or 1851 >census. I have the 1871. >They both died before the 1881 census and I've tracked their grandson Joseph to >1891. We also have a letter and photographs from Joseph. > >1841 Census Steynton >Greenhill >William Woolcock 40 ag. lab. >Lettice 45 >James 13 >Mary 11 >Celia 9 >Thomas 7 >Lettice 4 >Jane 9 months > >1851 Census Steynton >William Woolcock 50 b. Rudbaxton >Lettice 54 b. Moat >Sarah 25 b. Steynton >Thomas Woolcock 17 b. Haverfordwest St. Thomas (sisters son) - not sure >about this >Lettice 14 b. Steynton >William 3 b. Steynton grandson > >1871 Census Steynton address 28 Dreen Hill >William Woodcok 70 ag. lab. St. Brides Pembrokeshire >Lettice 74 Moat Pembrokeshire >Joseph 12 grandson Swansea Glamorgan > >I noticed the similarity between the Greenhill (1841) and Dreen Hill (1871) and >wonder if one of these is a mistake. > >Any help would be appreciated. But I'm particularly interested in the 1861 >census for William and Lettice at this point. It may answer some other >questions. If you are related to this family, I would like to hear from you. > >Thanks so much. > >Debbie > > > > > > >- ------------------------------- >Do you Yahoo!? >Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online > >______________________________ -- Pat Powell

Hello Pat, last week we had information from the list (Janetana Davies) confirming our Smith family on "Timberland,West Haroldstone". Thomas Smith ,the father of our Elizabeth Smith is listed as Farmer. Elizabeth was born circ. 1850. The wife of Thomas is given as Jane , she is apparently his second wife , and is the stepmother to our Elizabeth. Elizabeth 's mother was apparently the owner of the farm !! - could you please check the 1841 census to see who is listed on the 1841 census on the "Timberland farm,West Haroldstone". It could be a Venable family? Thank you for your past asistance, Herb and Mary Schwarz, Ontario,Canada ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pat Powell" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Friday, February 06, 2004 3:57 AM Subject: [WLS-PEM] 1861 census lookup Woolcock/Woodcock/Woodcok/Woocock > Hello Debbie > > I have the 1841 census - original not transcribed - and it is definitely > Woolcock . > > Also the location is definitely Dreenhill in 1841 too. > > I'll get back to you on the 1861 entry. > > Cheers > > Pat > > > > > > In message <20040205212617.77[email protected]>, Debbie > Olsen <[email protected]> writes > >Hi everyone, > > > >I just looked at the 1871 census for William Woodcok (aka Woodcock) and have > >concluded that he and his wife indeed are the couple in the 1841 and 1851 census > >where their name has been transcribed as 'Woolcock'. It is possible that over > >time they changed their name. If you happen to be able to locate the 1841 and > >51 census easily and can e-mail it to me, I'd appreciate it - I'd love to see > >them. But I'm actually writing for the 1861 census. > > > >I would really appreciate an 1861 census lookup for > >William and Lettice Woolcock/Woodcock/Woodcok/Woocock > >William would be 60 and Lettice 64. > > > >Here is what I believe are their other census records. If you can add anything > >to this info, I would appreciate it. I haven't seen the actual 1841 or 1851 > >census. I have the 1871. > >They both died before the 1881 census and I've tracked their grandson Joseph to > >1891. We also have a letter and photographs from Joseph. > > > >1841 Census Steynton > >Greenhill > >William Woolcock 40 ag. lab. > >Lettice 45 > >James 13 > >Mary 11 > >Celia 9 > >Thomas 7 > >Lettice 4 > >Jane 9 months > > > >1851 Census Steynton > >William Woolcock 50 b. Rudbaxton > >Lettice 54 b. Moat > >Sarah 25 b. Steynton > >Thomas Woolcock 17 b. Haverfordwest St. Thomas (sisters son) - not sure > >about this > >Lettice 14 b. Steynton > >William 3 b. Steynton grandson > > > >1871 Census Steynton address 28 Dreen Hill > >William Woodcok 70 ag. lab. St. Brides Pembrokeshire > >Lettice 74 Moat Pembrokeshire > >Joseph 12 grandson Swansea Glamorgan > > > >I noticed the similarity between the Greenhill (1841) and Dreen Hill (1871) and > >wonder if one of these is a mistake. > > > >Any help would be appreciated. But I'm particularly interested in the 1861 > >census for William and Lettice at this point. It may answer some other > >questions. If you are related to this family, I would like to hear from you. > > > >Thanks so much. > > > >Debbie > > > > > > > > > > > > > >- ------------------------------- > >Do you Yahoo!? > >Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online > > > >______________________________ > > -- > Pat Powell > > > ==== WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE Mailing List ==== > Genuki PEM > http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/wal/PEM/ >