If you remind me Elida, I'll post the subs numbers to the lists. Gareth List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elida" <elida@signature.cc> To: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk>; <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 8:01 PM Subject: WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L updates > Gareth, > > Could you give us a weekly count (or monthly if that suits better) of the number > subscribed to this list, so we can evaluate the worthiness of remaining? > > Subscribing to the digest-mode as another lister suggested is not an option for > me; I've had enough problems with digest subscribers on other lists failing to > post subjects, failure of enough of message responded to, etc. - it's been a > real pain. Now since Rootsweb has begun posting the GenWeb board queries to > some of the lists the situation has worsened - I reject the digest mode. > > I'd like to see the WLS-Pembrokeshire-L grow and remain a viable part of > Rootsweb. > > Thanks for your consideration, > With appreciation, > Elida in SC > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 5:52 PM > Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > Hi Elida > > I hope you don't mind my posting this back to the list , just in case I > > have unintentionally given others the same wrong impression as well. > > > > As the administrator for the three lists involved I know that, as of > > tonight, WLS-Pem has 46 subscribers whereas the Dyfed list has 432.[and of > > course they don't all have Pem interests]. > > A week or so ago, WLS-Pem only had about 25 subscribers, so it is growing > > nicely. > > > > WLS-Pem certainly isn't a small branch of Dyfed-L, it will be whatever you, > > the subscribers , make it. > > I am on record on Dyfed-L as saying that I believe the new county based > > lists will largely take over from Dyfed-L in due course, it may be sooner > > than I thought. > > > > As I don't know whether there are subscribers to WLS-Pem that aren't fully > > aware of the position I was pointing out that right now the greater size and > > greater activity of the Dyfed list makes it more likely that you will get > > advice/make contacts on Pem matters on it. > > But it isn't a case of "instead of" but "as well as". > > That may well change as WLS-Pem develops, I don't expect to post such a > > message for much longer on this list. > > > > That's it, I hope that has "cleared the air" for you Elida . > > > > Gareth > > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > > Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > >

Julie Preston <juliepreston@ameritech.net> wrote (paraphrased): .... people like me, who've participated on the Dyfed list since its inception and also volunteer for lookups via the South/West Wales Lookup Exchange, do not wish to have to subscribe to the new county lists in order to field queries posted there, as that means we'll be monitoring 4 lists in order to help new researchers. ......*many* people subscribed to the Dyfed list have overlapping research interests. Many families moved from one county to the next. People on the Dyfed list have a wealth of resources and are willing to answer queries posted by new researchers but may not be interested in monitoring 4 different lists in order to help new people. At the moment, the Dyfed list offers a great deal of historical background on this area and any new researcher cannot help but to learn quite a lot by subscribing to it. If you subscribe only to the new county list, you'll be missing out on a great deal of helpful responses to your queries. ============= Hi PEM Listers, I, too, recommend that you subscribe to the Dyfed List, for the reasons that Julie outlined so eloquently. Even if experienced researchers such as Julie find time to "listen in" to the proceedings of this Pembrokeshire List, it is surely unreasonable to expect them to devote their time to lengthy contributions which are going to reach such a small audience. Many of the contributions from experienced researchers provide pointers from which *all* of us can benefit. It is a waste of valuable resources to restrict them to the few, when the opportunity is there to share their expertise more widely on the Dyfed List. My own policy will be to passively monitor the PEM list (and the other new single-county lists), but to continue whenever possible to participate actively on the Dyfed list (and the other pre-existing Welsh regional lists). Best wishes, John ---------------------------------- John Ball, South Wales, UK E-mail: wfha@clara.co.uk John's Welsh Family History Archive: http://home.clara.net/wfha/wales/index.htm --- This message is certified virus-free by AVG Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com). Version: 6.0.193 / Virus Database: 93 - Release Date: 19/09/00

Good ideas Kate! Thanks, Elida ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate Brookfield" <kbrookfi@sympatico.ca> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 6:56 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Hi Gareth, > I understand what you are telling Elida, but I didn't post on > Dyfed because it would mean people who subscribe to Pemb and Dyfed will be > getting the same message twice. Wouldn't it be simpler to put a reminder > post on Dyfed that the new Pemb list is now getting established and suggest > that those interested in Pembrokeshire, might like to take a look. I am > reluctant to subscribe to another list as the Carmarthenshire and Glamorgan > lists keep me busy. I don't think I could handle another busy list. > > Anyway, just a few thoughts. > > Kate >

Gareth, Could you give us a weekly count (or monthly if that suits better) of the number subscribed to this list, so we can evaluate the worthiness of remaining? Subscribing to the digest-mode as another lister suggested is not an option for me; I've had enough problems with digest subscribers on other lists failing to post subjects, failure of enough of message responded to, etc. - it's been a real pain. Now since Rootsweb has begun posting the GenWeb board queries to some of the lists the situation has worsened - I reject the digest mode. I'd like to see the WLS-Pembrokeshire-L grow and remain a viable part of Rootsweb. Thanks for your consideration, With appreciation, Elida in SC ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 5:52 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Hi Elida > I hope you don't mind my posting this back to the list , just in case I > have unintentionally given others the same wrong impression as well. > > As the administrator for the three lists involved I know that, as of > tonight, WLS-Pem has 46 subscribers whereas the Dyfed list has 432.[and of > course they don't all have Pem interests]. > A week or so ago, WLS-Pem only had about 25 subscribers, so it is growing > nicely. > > WLS-Pem certainly isn't a small branch of Dyfed-L, it will be whatever you, > the subscribers , make it. > I am on record on Dyfed-L as saying that I believe the new county based > lists will largely take over from Dyfed-L in due course, it may be sooner > than I thought. > > As I don't know whether there are subscribers to WLS-Pem that aren't fully > aware of the position I was pointing out that right now the greater size and > greater activity of the Dyfed list makes it more likely that you will get > advice/make contacts on Pem matters on it. > But it isn't a case of "instead of" but "as well as". > That may well change as WLS-Pem develops, I don't expect to post such a > message for much longer on this list. > > That's it, I hope that has "cleared the air" for you Elida . > > Gareth > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html

Thanks for the input Kate. It could be that Dyfed-L listers have heard enough from me recently on the new lists subject but I'll copy this there, and CGN, to keep them up to date with matters. As Dyfed-L [ 432 ] is still very much bigger than WLS-Pem[ 46 ] and WLS-Cgn [ 24 ] in subscriber numbers and still *does* cover Pem, Cgn and Cmn then of course it makes sense from a researcher's point of view to use Dyfed-L as well , even to the extent of double posting. It's early days yet but whilst the new lists are getting established, and the Dyfed list's function is unchanged, then some duplicate mail is the least of our problems, I think. I would beg to differ on one point you make, I would never have described Dyfed-L as a busy list, Glamorgan, yes. My suggested "survival" plan for you is to subscribe to all the lists in Digest mode, and only open mails that look of interest to you personally. I do realise that does require us all to give a little bit more thought to creating relevant subject line content ! Gareth List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate Brookfield" <kbrookfi@sympatico.ca> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 11:56 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Hi Gareth, > I understand what you are telling Elida, but I didn't post on > Dyfed because it would mean people who subscribe to Pemb and Dyfed will be > getting the same message twice. Wouldn't it be simpler to put a reminder > post on Dyfed that the new Pemb list is now getting established and suggest > that those interested in Pembrokeshire, might like to take a look. I am > reluctant to subscribe to another list as the Carmarthenshire and Glamorgan > lists keep me busy. I don't think I could handle another busy list. > > Anyway, just a few thoughts. > > Kate > >

Kate, Glad I was able to help you in the past. :-) I would also recommend, as a way to keep your inbox manageable, to subscribe to the lists in Digest mode. I've always subscribed this way and, although you don't receive the postings until there are enough to be sent in a batch, or 'digest', it definitely keeps the quantity of incoming messages down to an extremely reasonable level. Best, Julie Preston juliepreston@ameritech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate Brookfield" <kbrookfi@sympatico.ca> To: "Julie Preston" <juliepreston@ameritech.net>; <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2000 12:09 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] Pemb or Dyfed lists? > Hi Julie, > Thanks for your response. Nice to see your name again.:-)) I > remember you helped me get the book on Welsh family History. > > I don't know why I stopped subscribing to Dyfed, except I was finding it too > difficult to keep my In-Box at a manageable size. I had to drop the Yorks > list for the same reason. > > However, my research seems to have moved out of Carmarthenshire and into > Pembroke and Cardigan. > > So, if others don't mind duplicate posts, I will post on Dyfed as well as > Pembrokeshire. > > Kate >

Hi Julie, Thanks for your response. Nice to see your name again.:-)) I remember you helped me get the book on Welsh family History. I don't know why I stopped subscribing to Dyfed, except I was finding it too difficult to keep my In-Box at a manageable size. I had to drop the Yorks list for the same reason. However, my research seems to have moved out of Carmarthenshire and into Pembroke and Cardigan. So, if others don't mind duplicate posts, I will post on Dyfed as well as Pembrokeshire. Kate

Hi Gareth, Thanks for your reply and for posting on Dyfed. Maybe, I will subscribe and post my Pembroke query there. I get the feeling that those who really know the area subscribe to the other lists. :-)) Not opening some messages because of the subject title, is not foolproof as so many people change the topic or thread without changing the subject line. But no big deal as I have been doing these genealogy conferences since the old BBS days and know that what goes around comes around! Thanks for all you do to make these conferences possible. I appreciate the time and help of people like yourself. Kate

Kate, This works two ways --- people like me, who've participated on the Dyfed list since its inception in early '98 and also volunteer for lookups via the South/West Wales Lookup Exchange, also do not wish to have to subscribe to the new county lists in order to field queries posted there, as that means we'll be monitoring 4 lists in order to help new researchers. The Dyfed list covers Cardiganshire, Carmarthenshire and Pembrokeshire and the number of queries for any specific county are not that numerous. Additionally, there are *many* people subscribed to the Dyfed list who have overlapping research interests. If you spend a lot of time researching this area, it becomes apparent that many families moved from one county to the next. These people on the Dyfed list have a wealth of resources at hand and are willing to answer queries posted by new researchers but may not be interested in monitoring 4 different lists in order to help new people. Because of the many overlapping situations, one would be constantly recommending that people also subscribe to the next county list. At the moment, the Dyfed list offers a great deal of historical background on this area and any new researcher cannot help but to learn quite a lot by subscribing to it. Simply put, if you subscribe only to the new county list, you'll be missing out on a great deal of helpful responses to your queries as they'll only reach a limited number of people (many of whom will be new to Welsh research themselves and won't be able to offer solutions), until such time as the amount of traffic exceeds the viability of having a Dyfed list and going completely over to the specific county lists. Regards, Julie Preston juliepreston@ameritech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kate Brookfield" <kbrookfi@sympatico.ca> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 6:56 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Hi Gareth, > I understand what you are telling Elida, but I didn't post on > Dyfed because it would mean people who subscribe to Pemb and Dyfed will be > getting the same message twice. Wouldn't it be simpler to put a reminder > post on Dyfed that the new Pemb list is now getting established and suggest > that those interested in Pembrokeshire, might like to take a look. I am > reluctant to subscribe to another list as the Carmarthenshire and Glamorgan > lists keep me busy. I don't think I could handle another busy list. > > Anyway, just a few thoughts. > > Kate >

Hi Elida I hope you don't mind my posting this back to the list , just in case I have unintentionally given others the same wrong impression as well. As the administrator for the three lists involved I know that, as of tonight, WLS-Pem has 46 subscribers whereas the Dyfed list has 432.[and of course they don't all have Pem interests]. A week or so ago, WLS-Pem only had about 25 subscribers, so it is growing nicely. WLS-Pem certainly isn't a small branch of Dyfed-L, it will be whatever you, the subscribers , make it. I am on record on Dyfed-L as saying that I believe the new county based lists will largely take over from Dyfed-L in due course, it may be sooner than I thought. As I don't know whether there are subscribers to WLS-Pem that aren't fully aware of the position I was pointing out that right now the greater size and greater activity of the Dyfed list makes it more likely that you will get advice/make contacts on Pem matters on it. But it isn't a case of "instead of" but "as well as". That may well change as WLS-Pem develops, I don't expect to post such a message for much longer on this list. That's it, I hope that has "cleared the air" for you Elida . Gareth List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elida" <elida@signature.cc> To: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 8:23 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Didn't disagree, just stated my impression that it was a new Rootsweb list > starting up with no information from Rootsweb that it was to be a small branch > of a larger list. > > Elida > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 3:16 PM > Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > Hi Elida > > I worded my message very carefully and precisely, what part of it do you > > disagree with ? > > > > Gareth > > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > > Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Elida" <elida@signature.cc> > > To: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk>; > > <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 7:51 PM > > Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > > > > I didn't get that impression from what the Rootsweb newsletter told us > > here in > > > the States. > > > > > > Elida in South Carolina, USA > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> > > > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > > > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 8:53 AM > > > Subject: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > > > > > > > Would subscribers seeking assistance/contacts please note that the main > > > > list in terms of numbers of subscribers and traffic covering the > > counties of > > > > PEM and CGN is still the Dyfed list. > > > > > > > > Details of subscription to all Welsh lists are on my Help Page,see > > below, > > > > under Mailing Lists. > > > > > > > > Gareth > > > > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > > > > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > > > > Help Page > > http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Hi Elida I worded my message very carefully and precisely, what part of it do you disagree with ? Gareth List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elida" <elida@signature.cc> To: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk>; <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 7:51 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > I didn't get that impression from what the Rootsweb newsletter told us here in > the States. > > Elida in South Carolina, USA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 8:53 AM > Subject: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > Would subscribers seeking assistance/contacts please note that the main > > list in terms of numbers of subscribers and traffic covering the counties of > > PEM and CGN is still the Dyfed list. > > > > Details of subscription to all Welsh lists are on my Help Page,see below, > > under Mailing Lists. > > > > Gareth > > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > > Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > > > > > > > >

Hi Gareth, I understand what you are telling Elida, but I didn't post on Dyfed because it would mean people who subscribe to Pemb and Dyfed will be getting the same message twice. Wouldn't it be simpler to put a reminder post on Dyfed that the new Pemb list is now getting established and suggest that those interested in Pembrokeshire, might like to take a look. I am reluctant to subscribe to another list as the Carmarthenshire and Glamorgan lists keep me busy. I don't think I could handle another busy list. Anyway, just a few thoughts. Kate

Thanks, but no thanks. I want to zero in on the Pembrokeshire list. That saves time. Elida ----- Original Message ----- From: "Julie Preston" <juliepreston@ameritech.net> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 3:13 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Elida, > > The Pembrokeshire list is still quite new and there are many subscribers > who've been participating on the long-established Dyfed list with > Pembrokeshire interests (as well as interests in the adjoining counties) who > may not yet be subscribed to the Pembrokeshire list. Suggest you also sub > to the Dyfed list so as to get more input. > > Regards, > > Julie Preston > juliepreston@ameritech.net > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Elida" <elida@signature.cc> > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 2:51 PM > Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > I didn't get that impression from what the Rootsweb newsletter told us > here in > > the States. > > > > Elida in South Carolina, USA > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> > > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 8:53 AM > > Subject: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > > > > Would subscribers seeking assistance/contacts please note that the main > > > list in terms of numbers of subscribers and traffic covering the > counties of > > > PEM and CGN is still the Dyfed list. > > > > > > Details of subscription to all Welsh lists are on my Help Page,see > below, > > > under Mailing Lists. > > > > > > Gareth > > > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > > > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > > > Help Page > http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >

Elida, The Pembrokeshire list is still quite new and there are many subscribers who've been participating on the long-established Dyfed list with Pembrokeshire interests (as well as interests in the adjoining counties) who may not yet be subscribed to the Pembrokeshire list. Suggest you also sub to the Dyfed list so as to get more input. Regards, Julie Preston juliepreston@ameritech.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elida" <elida@signature.cc> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 2:51 PM Subject: Re: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > I didn't get that impression from what the Rootsweb newsletter told us here in > the States. > > Elida in South Carolina, USA > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> > To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 8:53 AM > Subject: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > > > > Would subscribers seeking assistance/contacts please note that the main > > list in terms of numbers of subscribers and traffic covering the counties of > > PEM and CGN is still the Dyfed list. > > > > Details of subscription to all Welsh lists are on my Help Page,see below, > > under Mailing Lists. > > > > Gareth > > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > > Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > > > > > > >

I didn't get that impression from what the Rootsweb newsletter told us here in the States. Elida in South Carolina, USA ----- Original Message ----- From: "Gareth" <W/gen@johngareth.freeserve.co.uk> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 8:53 AM Subject: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] A reminder > Would subscribers seeking assistance/contacts please note that the main > list in terms of numbers of subscribers and traffic covering the counties of > PEM and CGN is still the Dyfed list. > > Details of subscription to all Welsh lists are on my Help Page,see below, > under Mailing Lists. > > Gareth > List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. > Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html > Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html > > >

Would subscribers seeking assistance/contacts please note that the main list in terms of numbers of subscribers and traffic covering the counties of PEM and CGN is still the Dyfed list. Details of subscription to all Welsh lists are on my Help Page,see below, under Mailing Lists. Gareth List Administrator for Dyfed, CGN & PEM. Lookup Exchange http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/lookup.html Help Page http://www.johngareth.freeserve.co.uk/hicks.html

Fwd for Wayne who has used the wrong address ----- Original Message ----- From: <FrtnWayne@aol.com> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L-request@rootsweb.com> Sent: Saturday, October 21, 2000 6:26 AM Subject: Fortune from Pembroke S.Wales. > Hi I am looking for John Fortune and family Abt.1822 in Pem Martletwy > S.Wales,Married Mary Davies Abt.1826 in Pem.Pembroke.(need 1841 censes). > Thank You for any help. > Wayne Fortune Sr. > >

Kilwendeg is given as the place of residence for James Morris and Martha Anne Moses on their wedding certificate. Both give the occupation 'servant', so I assume Kilwendeg is a large home. The marriage took place in the parish of Capel Colman. I would appreciate any information on the parish church of Capel Colman or about the house called 'Kilwendeg'. Thanks, Kate ----- Original Message ----- From: "darryl & johanna" <darryl2@gate.net> To: <WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Friday, October 20, 2000 5:07 PM Subject: [WLS-PEMBROKESHIRE] Mary Husband > Sorry if you get this again but i copied the address down wrong. > > > I am new to the lisy and looking for any info on HUSBAND. > Mary HUSBAND, born 20 December 1661 Pembroke,Wales,married to Lewis AP ROBERT,dates unknown. > Marys parents were John HUSBAND and Jane ? . > Any help appreciated Thank you Johanna > >

Hi, I have just received a copy of a marriage certificate for James MORRIS to Martha Anne MOSES, 1862. I had thought James was the son of John MORRIS shown on the 1851 census as living at City Road, Haverfordwest. However, this marriage certificate gives the father of James as David MORRIS. If anyone has access to the 1861, or 1851 Census for Haverfordwest West, I would appreciate a look-up for a David MORRIS with a son called James and possibly another names Thomas. Thomas Morris was a witness at the wedding. Thanks, Kate

Does anyone have the same research interests as myself? Griffith Edwards of Newton West/Hayscastle Stephen/Julie Morse of Letterston/Fishguard/Langstone David/Mary Phillip of Trenewydd Fawr Thomas/William Hire of Brawdy Levi/James James of Ambleston/Castle Hylem Thomas Page, Shoemaker of Ambleston Lewis/George Nicholas, Auctioneers & Farmers of Mathry Mary Phillips of Meline John Phillips/Susan Harries of Steynton Levi/Hannah Davies of Nevern Pat