ha ha, Jack as a web site designer the only thing I use is Photoshop it is the best. We had a family picture where my niece fell over right at the time of the picture [21 people in one shot...was not going to get a reshoot] so I set her up straight and had to rebuild every thing around her... then for fun I put her one foot up side down to see if any one would notice.. do you know that my sister and brother have that picture on their mantle and they haven't notice her foot yet....giggles... Oh and in the same picture I added my son from another picture because he was the only one that could not be there in person... no one noticed that either.. =) Cuz B ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jack Wynn" <jwynn@mindspring.com> To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:19 PM Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > The difference is the software necessary to process (extract) a still > picture from a video. .Most folks don't have that. Digital cameras > are absolutely wonderful! The ability to process a jpeg (or even > better a tiff file) with software normally supplied with modern > digital cameras is awesome. I've been using Photoshop for years and > most "included software" is at least an early version of Photoshop. > > My first edition of Photoshop inspired me to experiment. I had a > picture of Linda's gggrandparents sitting side by side in the classic > pose. Only problem was someone had spilled ink in the middle of the > photo. I decided to play with it and shortly thereafter I had > perfectly rebuilt his jacket and her bloused sleeve dress. Then I > decide to change the frown (scowl ?) on her face - voila!! A really > great photo emerged and was capable of printing in multiple formats. > > Jack > > > >I was thinking the same thing Jack, > >or even a video camera that allows for "still's" > >Cuz B > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Jack Wynn" <jwynn@mindspring.com> > >To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> > >Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:52 PM > >Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > > > > > >> Any visitor would do better taking a digital picture of the portrait. > >> > >> Jack Wynn >

Wow--do they only have the professional photo shop, or is there an affordable one for home use? I am so disappointed with the software I have; it is not user-friendly, and cannot do very many things I want to do. (I only want to do basic things) Mary Winn Anderson ----- Original Message ----- From: "The Thill Group Inc" <ttg-inc@comcast.net> To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:19 PM Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > ha ha, Jack as a web site designer the only thing I use is Photoshop it is > the best. We had a family picture where my niece fell over right at the time > of the picture [21 people in one shot...was not going to get a reshoot] so I > set her up straight and had to rebuild every thing around her... then for > fun I put her one foot up side down to see if any one would notice.. do you > know that my sister and brother have that picture on their mantle and they > haven't notice her foot yet....giggles... Oh and in the same picture I added > my son from another picture because he was the only one that could not be > there in person... no one noticed that either.. =) > Cuz B > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jack Wynn" <jwynn@mindspring.com> > To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:19 PM > Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > > > > The difference is the software necessary to process (extract) a still > > picture from a video. .Most folks don't have that. Digital cameras > > are absolutely wonderful! The ability to process a jpeg (or even > > better a tiff file) with software normally supplied with modern > > digital cameras is awesome. I've been using Photoshop for years and > > most "included software" is at least an early version of Photoshop. > > > > My first edition of Photoshop inspired me to experiment. I had a > > picture of Linda's gggrandparents sitting side by side in the classic > > pose. Only problem was someone had spilled ink in the middle of the > > photo. I decided to play with it and shortly thereafter I had > > perfectly rebuilt his jacket and her bloused sleeve dress. Then I > > decide to change the frown (scowl ?) on her face - voila!! A really > > great photo emerged and was capable of printing in multiple formats. > > > > Jack > > > > > > >I was thinking the same thing Jack, > > >or even a video camera that allows for "still's" > > >Cuz B > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Jack Wynn" <jwynn@mindspring.com> > > >To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> > > >Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:52 PM > > >Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > > > > > > > > >> Any visitor would do better taking a digital picture of the portrait. > > >> > > >> Jack Wynn > > >

Mary, Adobe Photoshop that I have is the Adobe Creative Suite which is $549.00 http://www.adobe.com/store/products/master.jhtml?id=catPhotoshop What I used before that was Paint Shop Pro from Jasc, it was a great way to learn how to do some of the stuff we were talking about. You can get it on ebay on a "BUY IT NOW" sale for 34.99 for the next 7 hours http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3632737882&category=188 and there is tutorial's on http://www.jasc.com/ or you can buy it from them [Jasc] for 109.00 in the box http://www.jasc.com/products/paintshoppro/ Hope that helps? Hugs Cuz B ttg-inc@comcast.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "marywinn" <marywinn@cfl.rr.com> To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 8:56 PM Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > Wow--do they only have the professional photo shop, or is there an > affordable one for home use? > > I am so disappointed with the software I have; it is not user-friendly, and > cannot do very many things I want to do. (I only want to do basic things) > > Mary Winn Anderson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "The Thill Group Inc" <ttg-inc@comcast.net> > To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:19 PM > Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > > > > ha ha, Jack as a web site designer the only thing I use is Photoshop it is > > the best. We had a family picture where my niece fell over right at the > time > > of the picture [21 people in one shot...was not going to get a reshoot] so > I > > set her up straight and had to rebuild every thing around her... then for > > fun I put her one foot up side down to see if any one would notice.. do > you > > know that my sister and brother have that picture on their mantle and they > > haven't notice her foot yet....giggles... Oh and in the same picture I > added > > my son from another picture because he was the only one that could not be > > there in person... no one noticed that either.. =) > > Cuz B > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Jack Wynn" <jwynn@mindspring.com> > > To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:19 PM > > Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > > > > > > > The difference is the software necessary to process (extract) a still > > > picture from a video. .Most folks don't have that. Digital cameras > > > are absolutely wonderful! The ability to process a jpeg (or even > > > better a tiff file) with software normally supplied with modern > > > digital cameras is awesome. I've been using Photoshop for years and > > > most "included software" is at least an early version of Photoshop. > > > > > > My first edition of Photoshop inspired me to experiment. I had a > > > picture of Linda's gggrandparents sitting side by side in the classic > > > pose. Only problem was someone had spilled ink in the middle of the > > > photo. I decided to play with it and shortly thereafter I had > > > perfectly rebuilt his jacket and her bloused sleeve dress. Then I > > > decide to change the frown (scowl ?) on her face - voila!! A really > > > great photo emerged and was capable of printing in multiple formats. > > > > > > Jack > > > > > > > > > >I was thinking the same thing Jack, > > > >or even a video camera that allows for "still's" > > > >Cuz B > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > > >From: "Jack Wynn" <jwynn@mindspring.com> > > > >To: <WINN-L@rootsweb.com> > > > >Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 4:52 PM > > > >Subject: Re: [WINN] Portrait of Richard Winn > > > > > > > > > > > >> Any visitor would do better taking a digital picture of the > portrait. > > > >> > > > >> Jack Wynn > > > > > > > >