In a message dated 1/2/2003 8:08:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, EAFerguson@aol.com writes: > AARRGG! > > Why did my e-mail about John Winn - Elizabeth Minor come through so > garbled? > > For those who tried to make sense out of it, DON'T. I did some searching > for > the source and found that it was a copy of the same material which has been > > circulating for some time; i.e. not documented. Also, the source did not > support the 'widow' assumption. > > If I get anything worth sending I'll post it again. > > But why, List Mom, did my e-mail come thru garbled? Did I do something > wrong. > I haven't had that problem before. > > This whole thing has been frustrating! > > Earl Earl > > Dont worry Earl. This whole question of John Winn and Elizabeth Minor has been garbled, twisted, turned inside out, upside down and every which way for so long that I think that all of us are just about brain dead over it. Sad thing is we may never know just how the Minor name became to be so prolific throughout this line. Terry