I found them under Micheal & Rose DEGA in 1900 & 1910. Nothing in 1920. John in Racine Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:01:37 -0600 > From: "Mary R. Frank" <mrfrank@uwm.edu> > Subject: Re: [WIMILWAU] census-Deja 1890? > To: wimilwau@rootsweb.com > Message-ID: <459C0BA1.20803@uwm.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > Sandy, where did you find them in the 1900 census (under what > spelling)? I saw a Michael and Anna Deja on Ancestry for 1910 and 1920, > but not for 1900. I assume these are not your Michael and Anastasia? > > 1910: > Michael Deja 58 > Anna Deja 55 > Laudislava Deja 21 > Bernard Deja 18 > Helen Deja 13 > > And again in 1920: > Michail Deja 68 > Anna Deja 64 > Helen Deja 22 > > Expanding on what John wrote, it looks like Martha married someone named > Frank Hegna. > > > John wrote: > > Sandy- > > > > As Ellen stated, the 1890 Census is extremely limited. Another option, > if > > you belong to a library, is to order the 1895 and 1905 Wisconsin State > > Census for Milwaukee County on microfilm, and manually search for your > > folks. If a library isn't readily available to you, you can order the > same > > film through a local Family History Center. There is a rental charge for > > ordering through the FHC. If you are in Wisconsin, or better yet, the > > greater Milwaukee area, these films may already be available for free > > viewing. > > > > It looks like Martha married on Sep 16, 1896 in Milwaukee. That explains > > her. Then there's a marriage for a Frank Deja on Nov 26, 1900 in > Manitowoc > > County and one for a Frank Deja on Sep 10, 1899 in Portage County. If > either > > one is your Franz, that would explain his whereabouts for the 1900 > census. > > By ordering Martha's marriage cert, you may get more answers and other > > variations of the surname DEJA. > > > > John in Racine WI > > > > Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:04:35 -0600 > > > >> From: "Ellen- (Milwaukee)" <milwaukee@linkstothepast.com> > >> Subject: Re: [WIMILWAU] census-Deja 1890? > >> To: wimilwau@rootsweb.com > >> Message-ID: <200701022204350093.0107B6DD@mail2.onyourmark.com> > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > >> > >> There is not an 1890 Census for much of the country. > >> > >> Here is an article on why. > >> > >> http://linkstothepast.com/milwaukee/1890cens.html > >> > >> Ellen- > >> > >> > >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > >> > >> On 1/2/2007 at 9:58 PM sandisgifts70665@peoplepc.com wrote: > >> > >> > >>> Is there not a 1890 census for Milw. Wi,? > >>> Mt gr. grand parents are on the NY pass. list as arriving 4/12/1881. > >>> with children Franz age 4 b. abt. 1877 poland Germany > >>> Martha Deja age 11 months b. abt. 1880 poland Germany > >>> > >>> I have Michael & Anastasia on 1900 census in Milw Wi. > >>> but Franz & Martha must have been moved out by that time, as they are > not > >>> on it. > >>> Is there any way to find out where they went? > >>> Thank you for any help I can get on this. Sandy
Woops, wrong ones. Sorry! Sandy showed me that they were transcribed as DEA in 1900. John On 1/3/07, John <circlescape@gmail.com> wrote: > > I found them under Micheal & Rose DEGA in 1900 & 1910. Nothing in 1920. > > John in Racine > > Date: Wed, 03 Jan 2007 14:01:37 -0600 > > From: "Mary R. Frank" < mrfrank@uwm.edu> > > Subject: Re: [WIMILWAU] census-Deja 1890? > > To: wimilwau@rootsweb.com > > Message-ID: <459C0BA1.20803@uwm.edu > > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed > > > > Sandy, where did you find them in the 1900 census (under what > > spelling)? I saw a Michael and Anna Deja on Ancestry for 1910 and 1920, > > but not for 1900. I assume these are not your Michael and Anastasia? > > > > 1910: > > Michael Deja 58 > > Anna Deja 55 > > Laudislava Deja 21 > > Bernard Deja 18 > > Helen Deja 13 > > > > And again in 1920: > > Michail Deja 68 > > Anna Deja 64 > > Helen Deja 22 > > > > Expanding on what John wrote, it looks like Martha married someone named > > > > Frank Hegna. > > > > > > John wrote: > > > Sandy- > > > > > > As Ellen stated, the 1890 Census is extremely limited. Another option, > > if > > > you belong to a library, is to order the 1895 and 1905 Wisconsin State > > > > > Census for Milwaukee County on microfilm, and manually search for your > > > folks. If a library isn't readily available to you, you can order the > > same > > > film through a local Family History Center. There is a rental charge > > for > > > ordering through the FHC. If you are in Wisconsin, or better yet, the > > > greater Milwaukee area, these films may already be available for free > > > viewing. > > > > > > It looks like Martha married on Sep 16, 1896 in Milwaukee. That > > explains > > > her. Then there's a marriage for a Frank Deja on Nov 26, 1900 in > > Manitowoc > > > County and one for a Frank Deja on Sep 10, 1899 in Portage County. If > > either > > > one is your Franz, that would explain his whereabouts for the 1900 > > census. > > > By ordering Martha's marriage cert, you may get more answers and other > > > variations of the surname DEJA. > > > > > > John in Racine WI > > > > > > Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2007 22:04:35 -0600 > > > > > >> From: "Ellen- (Milwaukee)" <milwaukee@linkstothepast.com> > > >> Subject: Re: [WIMILWAU] census-Deja 1890? > > >> To: wimilwau@rootsweb.com > > >> Message-ID: <200701022204350093.0107B6DD@mail2.onyourmark.com> > > >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > >> > > >> There is not an 1890 Census for much of the country. > > >> > > >> Here is an article on why. > > >> > > >> http://linkstothepast.com/milwaukee/1890cens.html > > >> > > >> Ellen- > > >> > > >> > > >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** > > >> > > >> On 1/2/2007 at 9:58 PM sandisgifts70665@peoplepc.com wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> Is there not a 1890 census for Milw. Wi,? > > >>> Mt gr. grand parents are on the NY pass. list as arriving 4/12/1881. > > >>> with children Franz age 4 b. abt. 1877 poland Germany > > >>> Martha Deja age 11 months b. abt. 1880 poland Germany > > >>> > > >>> I have Michael & Anastasia on 1900 census in Milw Wi. > > >>> but Franz & Martha must have been moved out by that time, as they > > are not > > >>> on it. > > >>> Is there any way to find out where they went? > > >>> Thank you for any help I can get on this. Sandy > > >