I think we should stick to one vote regardless of the number of county coordinators for that county. If one coordinator gets one vote no matter how many sites they have, it seems inconsistent to grant co-coordinators more than one vote...this in effect allows two votes per site if that site has more than one coordinator. This could turn into quite a situation, if I name 4 people as co-coordinators with myself, do we get Five votes then for one site? I think it would be wiser to keep it simple and have one vote per county/person and if there are co-coordinators or husband/wife, then still just one vote. If the coordinator has more than one site it will not increase the number of votes they may cast, they are still limited to one vote like the rest of us. Joan Adams and Marquette CC Original Message: ----------------- From: Tina S Vickery [email protected] Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:15:55 -0500 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [WIGEN-L] Re: Follow-up: Proposed SC and ASC update to WIGenWeb Guidelines Michelle and Frank <smile>, my point is that although husband and wife [in your case of co-coordinating], you and Frank are individuals and each should have a voice. Tina ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michelle Laycock" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:06 PM Subject: Re: [WIGEN-L] Re: Follow-up: Proposed SC and ASC update to WIGenWeb Guidelines > Tina, et al, > > As a co-coordinator for 2 of the counties mentioned, let it be known > that Frank and I have no feelings one way or the other on voting. > Whatever the group decides we will accept. > > Michelle > Racine & Kenosha > > > > > > > > Tina S Vickery wrote: > > >The definition of Co-County Coordinators has been questioned. > > > >In the WIGenWeb Project, we have 4 counties with this designation. > >Pepin County, Kenosha County, Racine County, and Washington County. > >Each coordinator is recognized in their respective role as an > >individual volunteer, with individual vote and voice. > > > >Thus my "Each member may cast one vote only (no matter the number of > >county or topical sites hosted)." > > > >Discussion, comments? > > > >Tina > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Tina S Vickery" <[email protected]> > >To: <[email protected]> > >Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:51 PM > >Subject: Follow-up: Proposed SC and ASC update to WIGenWeb Guidelines > > > ><snip> > > > > > >==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== > >Celebrate Wisconsin! > >Visit the Waushara County WIGenWeb Project Pages > >http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwausha/wsctweb.html > >Visit the Wood County WIGenWeb Project Pages > >http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwood/ > > > > > > > > > > ==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== > Celebrate Wisconsin! > Visit the Walworth County WIGenWeb Project Pages > http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwalwor/ > ==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== Celebrate Wisconsin! Visit the Walworth County WIGenWeb Project Pages http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwalwor/ -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ .

I guess I have to agree with one vote for each county/and or coordinator. However in most states that I am affiliated with, each CC gets a vote, regardless of whether there are two or one CC to a county. I have two local coordinators in Waushara County, that do the work, email it to me and I upload, would that mean that they should then have votes, as well? While I agree that they should probably be able to vote, I see where Joan is coming from and would place an unfair advantage on Waushara County, to have three votes, and most of the counties with only one. It's a hard call, and maybe something we should all vote on, bowing to the majority. Jan Waushara & Bayfield Counties ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> > I think we should stick to one vote regardless of the number of county > coordinators for that county. > > If one coordinator gets one vote no matter how many sites they have, it > seems inconsistent to grant co-coordinators more than one vote...this in > effect allows two votes per site if that site has more than one > coordinator. This could turn into quite a situation, if I name 4 people as > co-coordinators with myself, do we get Five votes then for one site? I > think it would be wiser to keep it simple and have one vote per > county/person and if there are co-coordinators or husband/wife, then still > just one vote. If the coordinator has more than one site it will not > increase the number of votes they may cast, they are still limited to one > vote like the rest of us. > > Joan > Adams and Marquette CC > > Original Message: > ----------------- > From: Tina S Vickery [email protected] > Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 22:15:55 -0500 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [WIGEN-L] Re: Follow-up: Proposed SC and ASC update to > WIGenWeb Guidelines > > > Michelle and Frank <smile>, my point is that although husband and wife [in > your case of co-coordinating], you and Frank are individuals and each should > have a voice. > > Tina > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michelle Laycock" <[email protected]> > To: <[email protected]> > Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 10:06 PM > Subject: Re: [WIGEN-L] Re: Follow-up: Proposed SC and ASC update to WIGenWeb > Guidelines > > > > Tina, et al, > > > > As a co-coordinator for 2 of the counties mentioned, let it be known > > that Frank and I have no feelings one way or the other on voting. > > Whatever the group decides we will accept. > > > > Michelle > > Racine & Kenosha > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Tina S Vickery wrote: > > > > >The definition of Co-County Coordinators has been questioned. > > > > > >In the WIGenWeb Project, we have 4 counties with this designation. > > >Pepin County, Kenosha County, Racine County, and Washington County. > > >Each coordinator is recognized in their respective role as an > > >individual volunteer, with individual vote and voice. > > > > > >Thus my "Each member may cast one vote only (no matter the number of > > >county or topical sites hosted)." > > > > > >Discussion, comments? > > > > > >Tina > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Tina S Vickery" <[email protected]> > > >To: <[email protected]> > > >Sent: Tuesday, December 02, 2003 7:51 PM > > >Subject: Follow-up: Proposed SC and ASC update to WIGenWeb Guidelines > > > > > ><snip> > > > > > > > > >==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== > > >Celebrate Wisconsin! > > >Visit the Waushara County WIGenWeb Project Pages > > >http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwausha/wsctweb.html > > >Visit the Wood County WIGenWeb Project Pages > > >http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwood/ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== > > Celebrate Wisconsin! > > Visit the Walworth County WIGenWeb Project Pages > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwalwor/ > > > > > ==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== > Celebrate Wisconsin! > Visit the Walworth County WIGenWeb Project Pages > http://www.rootsweb.com/~wiwalwor/ > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > mail2web - Check your email from the web at > http://mail2web.com/ . > > > > > ==== WIGEN Mailing List ==== > Celebrate Wisconsin! > Visit the Taylor County WIGenWeb Project Pages > http://www.rootsweb.com/~witaylor/ > >