> I hope no one takes this wrong ...but can Janet and Stan of > ....JRSchwarze@juno.com ..... somehow put their postings in a lot less > e-mails at all? With the amount of geneology lists i belong to this list > fills my box fast ! > I understand where you're coming from, Bill. I accumulated almost 400 e-mail this week while off doing other things. Over half from Rootsweb lists. But the data is valuable. I'd hate to see it reduced. I wonder if we could encourage the listowner to perhaps increase the size factor on the Digests so that I don't get three Digests a day from this list. That would make my mail handling a little easier. Lou

Hi All, I am in several lists and I get lots of emails, also, but I like it just the way it is and see no reason for a change. The way the digest comes each email has to be opened separately any way so I see no need to increase the size of the mailings. Just my two cents worth. Mary -----Original Message----- From: L. R. Mills [mailto:lancelot@ap.net] Sent: Sunday, February 25, 2001 12:21 PM To: WICLARK-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [WICLARK] Less postings (changed subject) > I hope no one takes this wrong ...but can Janet and Stan of > ....JRSchwarze@juno.com ..... somehow put their postings in a lot less > e-mails at all? With the amount of geneology lists i belong to this list > fills my box fast ! > I understand where you're coming from, Bill. I accumulated almost 400 e-mail this week while off doing other things. Over half from Rootsweb lists. But the data is valuable. I'd hate to see it reduced. I wonder if we could encourage the listowner to perhaps increase the size factor on the Digests so that I don't get three Digests a day from this list. That would make my mail handling a little easier. Lou