Bertram is also in 1900 census under Bert Whitney and 1880 as Burtie. Found him on Ancestry.com census pages. >From: Miller H <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: [WHITNEY-L] Re: WHITNEY-D Digest V05 #81 >Date: Thu, 9 Jun 2005 09:37:14 -0700 (PDT) > >Do you have any vital records for Milton Whitney m. Lydia Cleveland, son of >Asa Whitney? > >[email protected] wrote: >WHITNEY-D Digest Volume 05 : Issue 81 > >Today's Topics: >#1 Bertram Cecil Whitney-Detroit Soci ["James Whitney" #2 Mary Kedall >["Miles Fowler" >Administrivia: >To unsubscribe from WHITNEY-D, send a message to > >[email protected] > >that contains in the body of the message the command > >unsubscribe > >and no other text. No subject line is necessary, but if your software >requires one, just use unsubscribe in the subject, too. > >______________________________Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 12:02:18 -0400 >From: "James Whitney" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Bertram Cecil Whitney-Detroit Society Blue Book ,1911 > >Recently was browsing "DAU's Blue Book for Detroit" published in 1911 >showing the social "elite' >of Detroit,Michigan and discovered a listing for Mr. Bertram Cecil Whitney >and his wife Beatrice Larned. > >Additional research yields the following: > >B.C. Whitney and his wife maintained homes in Detroit and New York, New >York. He had servants, chauffeur, cook and all the trappings of great >wealth. He is listed in 1910 and 1920 as a owner of theaters. No children >listed. > >Bertram was born in Jan. 1870 and was the son of a pioneer Michigan family. >His line is as follows: > >B.C. Whitney(Clark,William,Joshua,Joshua,Joshua,Richard,Richard,John). > >No additional data was found. What was his fate? Any heirs left from this >line? > >James E. Whitney,II > >______________________________Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2005 16:39:06 -0400 >From: "Miles Fowler" <[email protected]> >To: [email protected] >Subject: Mary Kedall > >I have become curious about Mary Kedall, the wife of Thomas Whitney (son of >THE John Whitney). There seems to be no certainty about her. Pierce thought >she was actually named Kettle but he could be wrong. At ancestry.com, many >people seem to think she was a Kendall and thereby trace her ancestry back >to 1355. But was she a Kendall or a Kedall? Anyone have any solid >information? (Some of those who have linked her to the Kendalls also think >that she had half siblings born in Cambridge, Mass.--instead of the more >likely Cambridge, England--between 1600-1623, when there was no Cambridge, >Mass.!) > >Miles Fowler > > > > >________________________________________________________________ >Sent via the WebMail system at mail.nexet.net > > > > > > > >Keep your fingers snappin' and your toes tappin'.......... >