Hey everyone I was just wondering, it seems more or less clear that John's father was Thomas, so even if this Thomas was not directly descended from the Whitneys of Whitney, doesn't that give John and his descendants the noble line back through his mother Mary Bray? Adrian B. Burke, Assistant to: Daniel B. Graves, Managing Director Elizabeth A. Chang, Vice President GIB - Media Group 130 Liberty Street, 28th Floor New York, N.Y. 10006 Phone: (212) 250-4195 Fax: (212) 669-6022 -- This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden.

This is a question for Robert Ward and Allan Green. I will be anxious to see what they have to say on this topic, but I was not aware there was a royal connection through Mary Bray. And it doesn't seem to be all that clear to me that Thomas was the father of John. Robert and Allan, do we have enough evidence to make that claim? from Carolyn Whitney Branagan Adrian Burke wrote: > Hey everyone I was just wondering, it seems more or less clear that John's father was Thomas, so even if this Thomas was not directly descended from the Whitneys of Whitney, doesn't that give John and his descendants the noble line back through his mother Mary Bray? > > > > Adrian B. Burke, Assistant to: > Daniel B. Graves, Managing Director > Elizabeth A. Chang, Vice President > GIB - Media Group > 130 Liberty Street, 28th Floor > New York, N.Y. 10006 > Phone: (212) 250-4195 > Fax: (212) 669-6022 > > > -- > > This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorised copying, disclosure or distribution of the material in this e-mail is strictly forbidden. > > >