Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 3/3
    1. [WHITE] VetoMail message from [email protected]
    2. Hello Important message from [email protected] I have just installed VetoMail an anti spam filtering tool. VetoMail is free to evaluate for 90 days. More information is available at http://www.vetomail.com <http://www.vetomail.com/iref.html> Vetomail simply and safely defeats all Spam [junk email] by ONLY allowing me to see email that has been authorised. Your email address [email protected] has now been auto authorised by me from my address book. However if you send me email from a different email address in future you will receive a message from Vetomail asking you to prove you are a real person and not just a spam sending robot. Should this occur it will only take you a few seconds, but I thought Id notify you now to save confusion in the future. You are receiving this message from [email protected] a VetoMail customer. VetoMail asks that senders verify their address before email is delivered. Yours is now already authorised. This only needs to do this once per VetoMail protected email address. If you want more information on Vetomail and how it can save you time and money by defeating all the spam you receive please visit the Vetomail website - http://www.vetomail.com <http://www.vetomail.com/iref.html> Thankyou.

    10/17/2003 08:44:34
    1. Re: [WHITE] VetoMail message from [email protected]
    2. Glitz
    3. My husband installed it before this msg and he is not happy with it. Says ~all~ his mail goes into veto mail and won't pull into outlook. He is fixing to uninstall it and he won't put it on mine. Is he doing something wrong? Glitz ----- Original Message ----- From: <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 1:44 AM Subject: [WHITE] VetoMail message from [email protected] > Hello > > Important message from [email protected] > > I have just installed VetoMail an anti spam filtering tool. VetoMail is > free to evaluate for 90 days. > > More information is available at http://www.vetomail.com > <http://www.vetomail.com/iref.html> > > Vetomail simply and safely defeats all Spam [junk email] by ONLY > allowing me to see email that has been authorised. > > Your email address [email protected] has now been auto authorised by > me from my address book. However if you send me email from a different > email address in future you will receive a message from Vetomail asking > you to prove you are a real person and not just a spam sending robot. > > Should this occur it will only take you a few seconds, but I thought Id > notify you now to save confusion in the future. > > > > > You are receiving this message from [email protected] a VetoMail > customer. > > VetoMail asks that senders verify their address before email is > delivered. Yours is now already authorised. This only needs to do this > once per VetoMail protected email address. > > If you want more information on Vetomail and how it can save you time > and money by defeating all the spam you receive please visit the > Vetomail website - http://www.vetomail.com > <http://www.vetomail.com/iref.html> > > Thankyou. > > > > ==== WHITE Mailing List ==== > WHITE LIST ADMINISTRATOR > <[email protected]> > >

    10/18/2003 01:21:15
    1. Re: [WHITE] VetoMail message from [email protected]
    2. Janet
    3. Hello Nancy *Glitz*.......... The following article appeared in the July 2003 RootsWeb Review and might be of interest to you........... If you are getting lots of Spam E-Mail it is probably your ISP........ You should contact them and see what *Filters* they have, if any.......... I for one rarely see any *Spam*...... That is perhaps 2 or 3 a month and it's been several months since I have gotten any........... The *WHITE-L* is set up to reply directly to you [I changed your address to the WHITE-L in the *To* address part].......... Therefore if there is a query you have posted and I have an answer for you that means that I am going to have to go thru the hassle of verifying my e-mail address............ And I for one am not going to do it........ Janet RootsWeb Review: RootsWeb's Weekly E-zine Vol. 6, No. 28, 09 July 2003, Circulation: 981,768+ (c) 1998-2003 RootsWeb.com, Inc. http://www.rootsweb.com/ Editor: Myra Vanderpool Gormley, Certified Genealogist [email protected] Certification: http://www.bcgcertification.org/certification/ RootsWeb Review is a free weekly e-zine 1b. SPAM FILTERS: CURES OR KILLERS? Sick of spam? Aren't we all? Many of us use various spam filters and/or our ISP does in a futile attempt to stem the flow of this garbage, but some of the latter are imposing Draconian methods that are causing more problems -- at least for genealogists -- than they are solving. Increasingly, e-mails sent from your favorite genealogy mailing lists and colleagues are getting bounced or trashed before they even reach you. In our overzealousness to rid ourselves of one problem (spam) we are creating additional ones (locking out the information that might be the key to solving a 100-year-old family history mystery). Additionally, if you are falling for some of the advertising hype to get the latest and greatest (so touted) anti-spam filters, especially those requiring everyone be put on your "white (approval) list before you can receive mail, you are creating a huge barrier for your genealogy mailing lists and colleagues. While we all hate spam, it is unacceptable for anyone who subscribes to a RootsWeb mailing list to be forced to validate an e-mail address for some other list subscriber. If you or your IPS has a spam-filtering program that insists upon only "approved" addresses being able to send you mail, then you should put the address of "rootsweb.com" in an accept list. If you have installed some anti-spam filters yourself then learn the software configuration and fix it so that mail from your mailing lists does not bounce back to the RootsWeb's listadmins. Don't rely on the default settings of your ISP or anti-spam filters. Your genealogical answers may be trapped in a "trash" folder on your computer now or even worse may never reach you. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Glitz" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 5:21 AM Subject: Re: [WHITE] VetoMail message from [email protected] | My husband installed it before this msg and he is not happy with it. Says | ~all~ his mail goes into veto mail and won't pull into outlook. He is | fixing to uninstall it and he won't put it on mine. Is he doing something | wrong? Glitz | ----- Original Message ----- | From: <[email protected]> | To: <[email protected]> | Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 1:44 AM | Subject: [WHITE] VetoMail message from [email protected] | | > Hello | > | > Important message from [email protected] | > | > I have just installed VetoMail an anti spam filtering tool. VetoMail is | > free to evaluate for 90 days. | > | > More information is available at http://www.vetomail.com | > <http://www.vetomail.com/iref.html> | > | > Vetomail simply and safely defeats all Spam [junk email] by ONLY | > allowing me to see email that has been authorised. | > | > Your email address [email protected] has now been auto authorised by | > me from my address book. However if you send me email from a different | > email address in future you will receive a message from Vetomail asking | > you to prove you are a real person and not just a spam sending robot. | > | > Should this occur it will only take you a few seconds, but I thought Id | > notify you now to save confusion in the future. | > | > You are receiving this message from [email protected] a VetoMail | > customer. | > | > VetoMail asks that senders verify their address before email is | > delivered. Yours is now already authorised. This only needs to do this | > once per VetoMail protected email address. | > | > If you want more information on Vetomail and how it can save you time | > and money by defeating all the spam you receive please visit the | > Vetomail website - http://www.vetomail.com | > <http://www.vetomail.com/iref.html> | > | > Thankyou. | >

    10/18/2003 02:46:44