RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 2/2
    1. RE: [WSP] Theophilus Whaley of Manhattan (son of Lawrence?), b. about 1705-1735, and Theophilus Whaley, son of Samuel, b. 1718
    2. Hart Bob - Global IT
    3. Carol- Joane Whaley was not married. From Stiles, History of the Judges of King Charles I, p. 349: (The context of the paragraph below includes Stiles citing a Miss Nelly Hazleton, living in 1793, who listed Samuel Whaley's children, and indicated that from these children all the Whaleys in Narragansett and Connecticut were descended; Stiles then goes on below to show that Samuel was not the only possible ancestor of these Whaleys. The Judge Hopkins mentioned was Samuel Hopkins, grandson of Theophilus Whaley by his daughter Martha and her husband Joseph Hopkins) "There was indeed another Whale from Theophilus, but not from Samuel. Joane, the eldest daughter of old Theophilus never was married: yet had two children, who went by the name of Whale, Lawrence Whale and Mary Whale. Lawrence lived many years in Narragansett, and afterwards went away towards Hudson's river. Judge Hopkins did not know his birth, but if then living in 1785, he judged he would be aged 95, or certainly 12 or 15 years older than Judge Hopkins was, and so his birth about 1690. Doctor Torry, who was born October 19, 1707, was well acquainted with Lawrence, and judged him 15 years older than himself, which would bring his birth 1692...." -Bob -----Original Message----- From: Carolyn Vosburg [mailto:lynvos@sbcglobal.net] Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 8:48 AM To: WHALEY-L@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [WSP] Theophilus Whaley of Manhattan (son of Lawrence?), b. about 1705-1735, and Theophilus Whaley, son of Samuel, b. 1718 On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Hart Bob - Global IT wrote: > Theophilus of Manhattan > was the son of Lawrence (son of Joanne, daughter of Theophilus) Bob, Am I missing something here? Did Joanne Whaley, daughter of Theophilus Whaley, marry a Whaley? If not, then her son, Lawrence, would not be a Whaley, but have Joanne's husband's last name, wouldn't he? Hmmmmmmmmmm. C. Carolyn Whaley Vosburg Houston, TX ==== WHALEY Mailing List ==== Whaley Oldest Ancestors List: now online at: http://whaley.phpbbnow.com ============================== Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx

    07/15/2006 04:04:02
    1. Re: [WSP] Theophilus Whaley of Manhattan (son of Lawrence?), b. about 1705-1735, and Theophilus Whaley, son of Samuel, b. 1718
    2. Carolyn Vosburg
    3. On a side note: When David took a job at the University of R.I. in 1960, we purchased a house not far from Narragansett in Peace Dale from Whaley Realty! Such fun to know we were living in Whaley territory even though it wasn't linked to our James Whaley of Virginia branch! C. Carolyn Whaley Vosburg Houston, TX On Jul 15, 2006, at 9:04 AM, Hart Bob - Global IT wrote: > Carol- > > Joane Whaley was not married. From Stiles, History of the Judges of > King > Charles I, p. 349: > > (The context of the paragraph below includes Stiles citing a Miss Nelly > Hazleton, living in 1793, who listed Samuel Whaley's children, and > indicated that from these children all the Whaleys in Narragansett and > Connecticut were descended; Stiles then goes on below to show that > Samuel was not the only possible ancestor of these Whaleys. The Judge > Hopkins mentioned was Samuel Hopkins, grandson of Theophilus Whaley by > his daughter Martha and her husband Joseph Hopkins) > > "There was indeed another Whale from Theophilus, but not from Samuel. > Joane, the eldest daughter of old Theophilus never was married: yet had > two children, who went by the name of Whale, Lawrence Whale and Mary > Whale. Lawrence lived many years in Narragansett, and afterwards went > away towards Hudson's river. Judge Hopkins did not know his birth, but > if then living in 1785, he judged he would be aged 95, or certainly 12 > or 15 years older than Judge Hopkins was, and so his birth about 1690. > Doctor Torry, who was born October 19, 1707, was well acquainted with > Lawrence, and judged him 15 years older than himself, which would bring > his birth 1692...." > > -Bob > > -----Original Message----- > From: Carolyn Vosburg [mailto:lynvos@sbcglobal.net] > Sent: Saturday, July 15, 2006 8:48 AM > To: WHALEY-L@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [WSP] Theophilus Whaley of Manhattan (son of Lawrence?), > b. > about 1705-1735, and Theophilus Whaley, son of Samuel, b. 1718 > > > On Jul 14, 2006, at 9:17 PM, Hart Bob - Global IT wrote: > >> Theophilus of Manhattan >> was the son of Lawrence (son of Joanne, daughter of Theophilus) > > Bob, > > Am I missing something here? Did Joanne Whaley, daughter of Theophilus > Whaley, marry a Whaley? If not, then her son, Lawrence, would not be a > Whaley, but have Joanne's husband's last name, wouldn't he? > Hmmmmmmmmmm. > > > C. > > > > Carolyn Whaley Vosburg > Houston, TX > > > ==== WHALEY Mailing List ==== > Whaley Oldest Ancestors List: now online at: > http://whaley.phpbbnow.com > > ============================== > Census images 1901, 1891, 1881 and 1871, plus so much more. > Ancestry.com's United Kingdom & Ireland Collection. Learn more: > http://www.ancestry.com/s13968/rd.ashx > > > ==== WHALEY Mailing List ==== > Having problems with your subscription? Contact list administrator at > whaley-admin@rootsweb.com > > ============================== > Search Family and Local Histories for stories about your family and the > areas they lived. Over 85 million names added in the last 12 months. > Learn more: http://www.ancestry.com/s13966/rd.ashx >

    07/15/2006 04:07:00