Sounds like the problem is HERS not YOURS Jackie and Ruby. I wouldn't pay her any mind. Just keep on keeping on, we need you! Leslie Quist [email protected] wrote: > The message below came in on the Whaley Message Board! > Tuesday, April 04, 2000 > Subject: Ruby Nelson & Jackie Weeden > Posted by:Terri Parker: > I wouldn't believe anything they have to say, whether in a book, on the web, > or in person, if they presented me with a note from God. They're a couple > of know-it-alls who don't know as much as they think they do. > > Our reply to the Message Board. > Subject:Ruby Nelson and Jackie Weeden > Posted by:Ruby L. Nelson > Wednesday, April 05, 2000 Subject:Ruby Nelson and Jackie Weeden > Message:To Terri Parker, etal. from Nelson and Weeden. > We are completely shocked at the bitter, caustic, insulting message by Terri > Parker that came out on the Message Board this morning. We don't think we > have EVER had ANY contact with this person. We are in communication with > a Terri WHALEY who is a descendant of Joshua Whaley and Sarah Crow > and she indicates that she is happy with what we have shared with her and > indicated that she is buying one of our books. > I, Ruby Nelson, write for Jackie Weeden, Whaley researcher, who is not on > line. I give her copies of messages and she hand writes answers. Weeden > has researched ALL Whaleys for over 30 years. She has done hands-on > research in many eastern and central states. She has over 50 notebooks > full of Census Records, Bible records, birth, death and cemetery records, > pension records, etc. of every state she could find them in. She has over > 900 Family Group Sheets in her file and I am typing them onto disks and > am sending them out by attachments. This is a free service. She shares > pension records from her file (and she has over 300 of them) and does > not charge for copies even though they cost her approximately $2000 out > of her own pocket. Weeden does not put out data that is not documented. > She is always willing to work with other Whaley descendants if there are > any differences. So WHY is she being called names? This message from > Terri Parker should NEVER have been sent out on the Message Board > as it is highly improper for some disgruntled person to make disparaging > remarks about a fine researcher that will help others make a poor judgment. > I think an apology is needed here. > Send further messages by private e-mail to [email protected] > > To WSP members--Well, shall we continue or call it quits???? > Ruby > >