RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 6/6
    1. Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.
    2. Margaret Wilkinson
    3. James MILLS Jane WESTALL Marriage: 9 Jul 1827 St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England Batch No.: M135803 Not sure why Elizabeth at baptism should become Jane at marriage - without more extensive research I would be reluctant to accept this, though it isn't impossible. The 3 children christened on the same day in 1845 had less names at BMD registration, perhaps it was the other way round with Jane!! Any particular reason why you are interested in this family, or are you just extending your Westall family info? Margaret > From: bobatbmw@cox.net > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400 > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng. > > Margaret, > > Thank you for the info as I did not have it all. I think you are on spot > with the Margaret Healey or Healy as I have seen it both ways. In the 1861 > and 1871 census it shows Booth living with James and Jane Mills as a nephew > again. Jane shows as being 63 in 1861. Could this possibly be Elizabeth b > ca. 1799 (the elder Booth's sister)? > > I could not find Booth Winkley Westall in the 1881 census and in the 1891 > census he is married to Annie Taylor Bet. Jan - Mar 1885 in Rochdale, > Lancashire, Eng. > > It is late. Goodnight and thank you again. > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 12:42 PM > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, > Eng. > > > Possibly related? > > Margaret WESTALL > Christening: 12 JUL 1795 > Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Father: Thos. WESTALL > Mother: Ann > Batch No.: P005823 > > Booth WESTELL > Christening: 02 MAR 1800 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Father: Thos. WESTELL > Mother: Ann > Batch No.: C007768 > > Booth WESTALL > Hannah WINKLEY > Marriage: 19 AUG 1822 > Clitheroe, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M033253 > > Amelia Nancy WESTALL > Alice Hannah WESTALL > Booth Winkley WESTALL > Christening: 07 SEP 1845 > Cathedral, Manchester, Lancashire, England > Father: Booth WESTALL > Mother: Hannah > Batch No.: C073541 > > ROBERT HEALEY > MARGARET WESTALL > Marriage: 31 JUL 1834 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M123452 > > This could make Hannah WINKLEY and Booth WESTALL parents of the three > children, with Margaret and Booth being brother and sister, thus giving rise > to the census entries where Booth Winkley WESTALL is nephew of Robert and > Margaret HEALEY. > > I have had a quick look for Amelia Nancy and Alice Hannah in 1851 census, > without any luck so far, but I think I may have taken this family back 2 > generations. > > There is a rootsweb mention of Booth WESTALL and Hannah HINKLEY, where > someone says they have been looking for the marriage, but does not give any > context to the reason - it may be worth contacting the poster of the message > for further details. > > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/KOFOED/2002-05/1022875978 > > Margaret > > > > > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) > Database version: 5.10390e > http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571440/direct/01/

    08/03/2008 12:56:42
    1. Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.
    2. Bob Westall
    3. Margaret, In 1995 I knew nothing of my family but James Newton Westall and his wife Mary Josephine Westall nee Heltsley my grand parents and their children or a dozen people or so. I am from Seattle but in 1995 I was living in Annandale, VA where I still live. I met Ken Westall and it turned out that this stranger with my name was a long lost cousin with a Westall family tree of 200 people. I had always felt I would like to know much more about my family so my search began. In about 1997 I stared the this Mailing list so help facilitate Westall family members communicating with one another. It has been more successful than I thought possible with some 60+ plus members worldwide as I type this. When I started not all Westall names fit neatly into my immediate family but I never discarded anyone. As time went by I started what I call Westall Family Groups to keep tract of those that did not neatly fit. Today my immediate Westall Family Group totals just short of 14,000 people and I have 28 other Westall Family Groups with all told some 25,000 names with dates and places for birth, marriage, and death for a great many of them. Not long ago I found that Fred Westall's family from East Ilsley, Berkshire and the Elizabeth Westall family of New Brunswick Canada are one in the same and I merged the two making one family of over 900 names. Such merging are not common for me but they do happen from time to time. As foolish and impossible as it might sound I am working slowly at the goal of making "ONE WESTALL FAMILY" for the world. We have many famous Artists, Authors, statesmen, Scientists, Businessmen, Doctors, pioneers, heroes and the list is endless. As a Westall I am deeply proud of each and every one of them. We have played a not so small role in this worlds history. There is a monument to William G. "Billy" Westall out in the middle of nowhere in Colorado. Billy was an engineer with 300 to 400 people on his train heading back to Denver after an all day excursion. As the train came around a bend in the tracks Billy could see the tracks blocked ahead. The fireman jumped to safety and lived but Billy road the train to the bitter end trying to stop it to save all he could. Billy was pinned under the locomotive in the crash and died a few hours later. It is amazing to see the quite large monument to a man, a Westall, that stayed the course ever though he likely knew it would cost him dearly. Billy was married with a young family. Was Billy a hero, yes indeed, in every way. Why have I spent many thousands of dollars and even many more thousands of hours on this? When I went to St. Lucia and stood at the grave of Thomas George Westall I felt the deepest of pride in being a part of this family. Thomas was one of a few men that were instrumental of helping St. Lucia gain her independence from Great Britain. He was also one of the first three legislators to be elected in St. Lucia in the 1920's after gaining independance. His grandson Tom is part of this mailing list and I have spoken to him within the last few days. I was instrumental in assisting Ursala from Venezuela in getting in touch with Tom. I have not done it all by myself as there are many others that need to be recognized such as Mick, Richard Jeremy, Oliver, and so many others. It would not surprise me that in my computer lives the largest single data base every complied for the Westall family. In the next 10 to 20 years I hope to expand it greatly and some day have a private website where any Westall family member could go and find out where they fit in the bigger scheme of things. Will it ever come down to just one large family, probably not but I can dream. To sum it all up Margaret this has all become a "LABOR OF LOVE" for me that will never end! Thank you everyone for helping out with my dream! Warmest Regards from Annandale, VA Bob Westall -----Original Message----- From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 1:57 AM To: westall@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng. James MILLS Jane WESTALL Marriage: 9 Jul 1827 St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England Batch No.: M135803 Not sure why Elizabeth at baptism should become Jane at marriage - without more extensive research I would be reluctant to accept this, though it isn't impossible. The 3 children christened on the same day in 1845 had less names at BMD registration, perhaps it was the other way round with Jane!! Any particular reason why you are interested in this family, or are you just extending your Westall family info? Margaret > From: bobatbmw@cox.net > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400 > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng. > > Margaret, > > Thank you for the info as I did not have it all. I think you are on spot > with the Margaret Healey or Healy as I have seen it both ways. In the 1861 > and 1871 census it shows Booth living with James and Jane Mills as a nephew > again. Jane shows as being 63 in 1861. Could this possibly be Elizabeth b > ca. 1799 (the elder Booth's sister)? > > I could not find Booth Winkley Westall in the 1881 census and in the 1891 > census he is married to Annie Taylor Bet. Jan - Mar 1885 in Rochdale, > Lancashire, Eng. > > It is late. Goodnight and thank you again. > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 12:42 PM > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, > Eng. > > > Possibly related? > > Margaret WESTALL > Christening: 12 JUL 1795 > Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Father: Thos. WESTALL > Mother: Ann > Batch No.: P005823 > > Booth WESTELL > Christening: 02 MAR 1800 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Father: Thos. WESTELL > Mother: Ann > Batch No.: C007768 > > Booth WESTALL > Hannah WINKLEY > Marriage: 19 AUG 1822 > Clitheroe, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M033253 > > Amelia Nancy WESTALL > Alice Hannah WESTALL > Booth Winkley WESTALL > Christening: 07 SEP 1845 > Cathedral, Manchester, Lancashire, England > Father: Booth WESTALL > Mother: Hannah > Batch No.: C073541 > > ROBERT HEALEY > MARGARET WESTALL > Marriage: 31 JUL 1834 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M123452 > > This could make Hannah WINKLEY and Booth WESTALL parents of the three > children, with Margaret and Booth being brother and sister, thus giving rise > to the census entries where Booth Winkley WESTALL is nephew of Robert and > Margaret HEALEY. > > I have had a quick look for Amelia Nancy and Alice Hannah in 1851 census, > without any luck so far, but I think I may have taken this family back 2 > generations. > > There is a rootsweb mention of Booth WESTALL and Hannah HINKLEY, where > someone says they have been looking for the marriage, but does not give any > context to the reason - it may be worth contacting the poster of the message > for further details. > > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/KOFOED/2002-05/1022875978 > > Margaret > > > > > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) > Database version: 5.10390e > http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Win New York holidays with Kellogg's & Live Search http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571440/direct/01/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) Database version: 5.10390e http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) Database version: 5.10390e http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/

    08/03/2008 12:27:32
    1. Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.
    2. Mike & Carol
    3. And because of you Bob it is a fine mailing list!!!! Thanks, Carol McLaughlin (descendant of Elizabeth Westall family of New Brunswick, Canada) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Bob Westall" <bobatbmw@cox.net> To: <westall@rootsweb.com> Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 7:27 AM Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire,Eng. > Margaret, > > In 1995 I knew nothing of my family but James Newton Westall and his wife > Mary Josephine Westall nee Heltsley my grand parents and their children or > a > dozen people or so. I am from Seattle but in 1995 I was living in > Annandale, VA where I still live. I met Ken Westall and it turned out > that > this stranger with my name was a long lost cousin with a Westall family > tree > of 200 people. I had always felt I would like to know much more about my > family so my search began. > > In about 1997 I stared the this Mailing list so help facilitate Westall > family members communicating with one another. It has been more > successful > than I thought possible with some 60+ plus members worldwide as I type > this. > > When I started not all Westall names fit neatly into my immediate family > but > I never discarded anyone. As time went by I started what I call Westall > Family Groups to keep tract of those that did not neatly fit. > > Today my immediate Westall Family Group totals just short of 14,000 people > and I have 28 other Westall Family Groups with all told some 25,000 names > with dates and places for birth, marriage, and death for a great many of > them. Not long ago I found that Fred Westall's family from East Ilsley, > Berkshire and the Elizabeth Westall family of New Brunswick Canada are one > in the same and I merged the two making one family of over 900 names. > Such > merging are not common for me but they do happen from time to time. > > As foolish and impossible as it might sound I am working slowly at the > goal > of making "ONE WESTALL FAMILY" for the world. We have many famous > Artists, > Authors, statesmen, Scientists, Businessmen, Doctors, pioneers, heroes and > the list is endless. As a Westall I am deeply proud of each and every one > of them. We have played a not so small role in this worlds history. > > There is a monument to William G. "Billy" Westall out in the middle of > nowhere in Colorado. Billy was an engineer with 300 to 400 people on his > train heading back to Denver after an all day excursion. As the train > came > around a bend in the tracks Billy could see the tracks blocked ahead. The > fireman jumped to safety and lived but Billy road the train to the bitter > end trying to stop it to save all he could. Billy was pinned under the > locomotive in the crash and died a few hours later. It is amazing to see > the quite large monument to a man, a Westall, that stayed the course ever > though he likely knew it would cost him dearly. Billy was married with a > young family. Was Billy a hero, yes indeed, in every way. > > Why have I spent many thousands of dollars and even many more thousands of > hours on this? When I went to St. Lucia and stood at the grave of Thomas > George Westall I felt the deepest of pride in being a part of this family. > Thomas was one of a few men that were instrumental of helping St. Lucia > gain > her independence from Great Britain. He was also one of the first three > legislators to be elected in St. Lucia in the 1920's after gaining > independance. His grandson Tom is part of this mailing list and I have > spoken to him within the last few days. I was instrumental in assisting > Ursala from Venezuela in getting in touch with Tom. > > I have not done it all by myself as there are many others that need to be > recognized such as Mick, Richard Jeremy, Oliver, and so many others. It > would not surprise me that in my computer lives the largest single data > base > every complied for the Westall family. In the next 10 to 20 years I hope > to > expand it greatly and some day have a private website where any Westall > family member could go and find out where they fit in the bigger scheme of > things. > > Will it ever come down to just one large family, probably not but I can > dream. To sum it all up Margaret this has all become a "LABOR OF LOVE" > for > me that will never end! > > Thank you everyone for helping out with my dream! > > Warmest Regards from Annandale, VA > > Bob Westall > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On > Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson > Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 1:57 AM > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, > Lancashire, > Eng. > > > > James MILLS > Jane WESTALL > Marriage: 9 Jul 1827 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M135803 > > Not sure why Elizabeth at baptism should become Jane at marriage - without > more extensive research I would be reluctant to accept this, though it > isn't > impossible. > The 3 children christened on the same day in 1845 had less names at BMD > registration, perhaps it was the other way round with Jane!! > > Any particular reason why you are interested in this family, or are you > just > extending your Westall family info? > Margaret > > >> From: bobatbmw@cox.net >> To: westall@rootsweb.com >> Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400 >> Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, > Lancashire, Eng. >> >> Margaret, >> >> Thank you for the info as I did not have it all. I think you are on spot >> with the Margaret Healey or Healy as I have seen it both ways. In the >> 1861 >> and 1871 census it shows Booth living with James and Jane Mills as a > nephew >> again. Jane shows as being 63 in 1861. Could this possibly be Elizabeth b >> ca. 1799 (the elder Booth's sister)? >> >> I could not find Booth Winkley Westall in the 1881 census and in the 1891 >> census he is married to Annie Taylor Bet. Jan - Mar 1885 in Rochdale, >> Lancashire, Eng. >> >> It is late. Goodnight and thank you again. >> >> Bob >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] > On >> Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson >> Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 12:42 PM >> To: westall@rootsweb.com >> Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, > Lancashire, >> Eng. >> >> >> Possibly related? >> >> Margaret WESTALL >> Christening: 12 JUL 1795 >> Rochdale, Lancashire, England >> Father: Thos. WESTALL >> Mother: Ann >> Batch No.: P005823 >> >> Booth WESTELL >> Christening: 02 MAR 1800 >> St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England >> Father: Thos. WESTELL >> Mother: Ann >> Batch No.: C007768 >> >> Booth WESTALL >> Hannah WINKLEY >> Marriage: 19 AUG 1822 >> Clitheroe, Lancashire, England >> Batch No.: M033253 >> >> Amelia Nancy WESTALL >> Alice Hannah WESTALL >> Booth Winkley WESTALL >> Christening: 07 SEP 1845 >> Cathedral, Manchester, Lancashire, England >> Father: Booth WESTALL >> Mother: Hannah >> Batch No.: C073541 >> >> ROBERT HEALEY >> MARGARET WESTALL >> Marriage: 31 JUL 1834 >> St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England >> Batch No.: M123452 >> >> This could make Hannah WINKLEY and Booth WESTALL parents of the three >> children, with Margaret and Booth being brother and sister, thus giving > rise >> to the census entries where Booth Winkley WESTALL is nephew of Robert and >> Margaret HEALEY. >> >> I have had a quick look for Amelia Nancy and Alice Hannah in 1851 census, >> without any luck so far, but I think I may have taken this family back 2 >> generations. >> >> There is a rootsweb mention of Booth WESTALL and Hannah HINKLEY, where >> someone says they have been looking for the marriage, but does not give > any >> context to the reason - it may be worth contacting the poster of the > message >> for further details. >> >> http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/KOFOED/2002-05/1022875978 >> >> Margaret >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) >> Database version: 5.10390e >> http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ >> >> ------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > _________________________________________________________________ > Win New York holidays with Kellogg's & Live Search > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571440/direct/01/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes > in the subject and the body of the message > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) > Database version: 5.10390e > http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ > > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) > Database version: 5.10390e > http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to > WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the > quotes in the subject and the body of the message >

    08/03/2008 06:31:28
    1. Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.
    2. Bob Westall
    3. Margaret, As noted Booth Winkley Westall was noted as a nephew when living with James and Jane Mills in Lancashire, England. I was just thinking out loud because so often when a person is noted as a niece or nephew and their name in the census is different from the Head of Household it seems more frequently they are a niece or nephews of the wife. Robert and Margaret Healey would be a perfect example of this with nephew Booth Winkley Westall living with them in the 1851 census? Sometimes it seems the more you know the more you realize you do not know? Bob -----Original Message----- From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 1:57 AM To: westall@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng. James MILLS Jane WESTALL Marriage: 9 Jul 1827 St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England Batch No.: M135803 Not sure why Elizabeth at baptism should become Jane at marriage - without more extensive research I would be reluctant to accept this, though it isn't impossible. The 3 children christened on the same day in 1845 had less names at BMD registration, perhaps it was the other way round with Jane!! Any particular reason why you are interested in this family, or are you just extending your Westall family info? Margaret > From: bobatbmw@cox.net > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400 > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng. > > Margaret, > > Thank you for the info as I did not have it all. I think you are on spot > with the Margaret Healey or Healy as I have seen it both ways. In the 1861 > and 1871 census it shows Booth living with James and Jane Mills as a nephew > again. Jane shows as being 63 in 1861. Could this possibly be Elizabeth b > ca. 1799 (the elder Booth's sister)? > > I could not find Booth Winkley Westall in the 1881 census and in the 1891 > census he is married to Annie Taylor Bet. Jan - Mar 1885 in Rochdale, > Lancashire, Eng. > > It is late. Goodnight and thank you again. > > Bob > > > -----Original Message----- > From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On > Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 12:42 PM > To: westall@rootsweb.com > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, > Eng. > > > Possibly related? > > Margaret WESTALL > Christening: 12 JUL 1795 > Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Father: Thos. WESTALL > Mother: Ann > Batch No.: P005823 > > Booth WESTELL > Christening: 02 MAR 1800 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Father: Thos. WESTELL > Mother: Ann > Batch No.: C007768 > > Booth WESTALL > Hannah WINKLEY > Marriage: 19 AUG 1822 > Clitheroe, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M033253 > > Amelia Nancy WESTALL > Alice Hannah WESTALL > Booth Winkley WESTALL > Christening: 07 SEP 1845 > Cathedral, Manchester, Lancashire, England > Father: Booth WESTALL > Mother: Hannah > Batch No.: C073541 > > ROBERT HEALEY > MARGARET WESTALL > Marriage: 31 JUL 1834 > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England > Batch No.: M123452 > > This could make Hannah WINKLEY and Booth WESTALL parents of the three > children, with Margaret and Booth being brother and sister, thus giving rise > to the census entries where Booth Winkley WESTALL is nephew of Robert and > Margaret HEALEY. > > I have had a quick look for Amelia Nancy and Alice Hannah in 1851 census, > without any luck so far, but I think I may have taken this family back 2 > generations. > > There is a rootsweb mention of Booth WESTALL and Hannah HINKLEY, where > someone says they have been looking for the marriage, but does not give any > context to the reason - it may be worth contacting the poster of the message > for further details. > > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/KOFOED/2002-05/1022875978 > > Margaret > > > > > > > > > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) > Database version: 5.10390e > http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Win New York holidays with Kellogg's & Live Search http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571440/direct/01/ ------------------------------- To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) Database version: 5.10390e http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/ E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) Database version: 5.10390e http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/

    08/03/2008 12:37:07
    1. Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.
    2. Margaret Wilkinson
    3. 1881, no obvious signs, as you say, of Booth Winkley WESTALL. Possibility (and only that), that if his father went to USA, he visited him there in 1881. A quick look on USA 1880 census - no joy for Booth WESTALL senior or junior. Margaret > From: margaretjanew@hotmail.com> To: westall@rootsweb.com> Date: Sun, 3 Aug 2008 06:56:42 +0100> Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.> > > > James MILLS> Jane WESTALL> Marriage: 9 Jul 1827> St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England> Batch No.: M135803> > Not sure why Elizabeth at baptism should become Jane at marriage - without more extensive research I would be reluctant to accept this, though it isn't impossible.> The 3 children christened on the same day in 1845 had less names at BMD registration, perhaps it was the other way round with Jane!!> > Any particular reason why you are interested in this family, or are you just extending your Westall family info?> Margaret> > > > From: bobatbmw@cox.net> > To: westall@rootsweb.com> > Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 23:18:22 -0400> > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.> >> > Margaret,> >> > Thank you for the info as I did not have it all. I think you are on spot> > with the Margaret Healey or Healy as I have seen it both ways. In the 1861> > and 1871 census it shows Booth living with James and Jane Mills as a nephew> > again. Jane shows as being 63 in 1861. Could this possibly be Elizabeth b> > ca. 1799 (the elder Booth's sister)?> >> > I could not find Booth Winkley Westall in the 1881 census and in the 1891> > census he is married to Annie Taylor Bet. Jan - Mar 1885 in Rochdale,> > Lancashire, Eng.> >> > It is late. Goodnight and thank you again.> >> > Bob> >> >> > -----Original Message-----> > From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On> > Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson> > Sent: Saturday, August 02, 2008 12:42 PM> > To: westall@rootsweb.com> > Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire,> > Eng.> >> >> > Possibly related?> >> > Margaret WESTALL> > Christening: 12 JUL 1795> > Rochdale, Lancashire, England> > Father: Thos. WESTALL> > Mother: Ann> > Batch No.: P005823> >> > Booth WESTELL> > Christening: 02 MAR 1800> > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England> > Father: Thos. WESTELL> > Mother: Ann> > Batch No.: C007768> >> > Booth WESTALL> > Hannah WINKLEY> > Marriage: 19 AUG 1822> > Clitheroe, Lancashire, England> > Batch No.: M033253> >> > Amelia Nancy WESTALL> > Alice Hannah WESTALL> > Booth Winkley WESTALL> > Christening: 07 SEP 1845> > Cathedral, Manchester, Lancashire, England> > Father: Booth WESTALL> > Mother: Hannah> > Batch No.: C073541> >> > ROBERT HEALEY> > MARGARET WESTALL> > Marriage: 31 JUL 1834> > St Chad'S, Rochdale, Lancashire, England> > Batch No.: M123452> >> > This could make Hannah WINKLEY and Booth WESTALL parents of the three> > children, with Margaret and Booth being brother and sister, thus giving rise> > to the census entries where Booth Winkley WESTALL is nephew of Robert and> > Margaret HEALEY.> >> > I have had a quick look for Amelia Nancy and Alice Hannah in 1851 census,> > without any luck so far, but I think I may have taken this family back 2> > generations.> >> > There is a rootsweb mention of Booth WESTALL and Hannah HINKLEY, where> > someone says they have been looking for the marriage, but does not give any> > context to the reason - it may be worth contacting the poster of the message> > for further details.> >> > http://archiver.rootsweb.ancestry.com/th/read/KOFOED/2002-05/1022875978> >> > Margaret> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322)> > Database version: 5.10390e> > http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/> >> > -------------------------------> > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message> > _________________________________________________________________> Win New York holidays with Kellogg’s & Live Search > http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571440/direct/01/> > -------------------------------> To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to WESTALL-request@rootsweb.com with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message _________________________________________________________________ Make a mini you on Windows Live Messenger! http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/107571437/direct/01/

    08/03/2008 02:14:49
    1. Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng.
    2. Bob Westall
    3. Margaret, There is a Booth Westall in the 1850 US Census, living in VA. age 50 born in England! There is also a Booth Westall buried in the NATIONAL CEMETERY AT KNOXVILLE, TENN. Westall, Booth "C" Co., 2nd Ohio Heavy Artillery, Jan 17, 1865, Sec. of Cem. 9, # of Grave 30 It seems to be a stretch that a 65 year old man born in England would come to the US in time to die in the Civil War, but who knows? Bob -----Original Message----- From: westall-bounces@rootsweb.com [mailto:westall-bounces@rootsweb.com] On Behalf Of Margaret Wilkinson Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2008 3:15 AM To: westall@rootsweb.com Subject: Re: [WESTALL] Booth Winkley Westall b 1844, Manchester, Lancashire, Eng. 1881, no obvious signs, as you say, of Booth Winkley WESTALL. Possibility (and only that), that if his father went to USA, he visited him there in 1881. A quick look on USA 1880 census - no joy for Booth WESTALL senior or junior. Margaret E-mail message checked by Spyware Doctor (5.5.1.322) Database version: 5.10390e http://www.pctools.com/en/spyware-doctor/

    08/03/2008 12:51:09