Note: The Rootsweb Mailing Lists will be shut down on April 6, 2023. (More info)
RootsWeb.com Mailing Lists
Total: 1/1
    1. Re: [WRY] 1911 Census
    2. sally roberts
    3. Hi Jean I'm not sure exactly what it is that you want to clarify, but from sight of the page, this is the information regarding their marital status Elizabeth was a widow, married 33 years, 6 children born, 5 living, 1 died Mary Ann married 10 years, 3 children born, 3 living Anne married ? years, 2 children born, 1 living, 1 died Robert Hugh married 7 years, 2 children born, 2 living Martha May married 1 year, 1 child born, 0 living, 1 died Ruth Alice single No relationship status is recorded. >From Ancestry, these are the marriage years for each child Mary Ellen Haigh married in 1899 in Huddersfield RD Martha May Haigh married in 1910 in Huddersfield RD Annie Haigh married in 1905 in Huddersfield RD Robert Hugh Haigh married in 1904 in Huddersfield RD, spouse - Emma Woodhouse Hope that helps, Regards, Sally ---------------------------------------- > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 08:12:30 +1030 > Subject: Re: [WRY] 1911 Census > > I am currently subscribed to Ancestry.com and therefore I don't have access > to this census and decided to wait it out until it is included, however I am > starting to receive information from 1911 census occasionally from people > who have either paid to look it up or have access to it through Findmypast. > The information I have which I am curious to clarify (if anyone can do a > look up without spending money) is of Elizabeth HAIGH widow aged 53 living > at Queen Street Paddock. It lists others in the house Mary Ellen aged 31 > Married a woollen weaver Annie married 29 Cotton Piecer, Martha May, 27 > Cloth Presser, an unnamed HAIGH aged 25 cotton piecer and Ruth Alice HAIGH > age 19 woollen weaver. > > Mary Ellen m Saffron LEES > Martha May m Herbert MELLOR (could be after 1911) > Annie m Shaw PEEL > Ruth Alice also married William Henry SPENCE. 15th April 1911 > Now I am wondering if this could be the reason they are all in Queen Street. > > Ancestry.com is quite a different programme to when I first looked at it and > we build our family tree on line and this has allowed me to connect with > each of these lines and my head is spinning with the amount of information I > am receiving. So I decided to try to record everything I know about each > person and the family lines. I started with Elizabeth JONES who married > John HAIGH, and simply recording the data I have in written form which I > hope will be easy for my descendents to understand I have 3 pages and I feel > I have come to know Elizabeth (who I never met but husband says he did as a > young child). > > It is really useful to join our bits of family information across the links > to create a larger picture. I bought the Ancestry family Tree Maker because > I didn't want to have to subscribe to read my Family Tree but I found it too > hard to use. However I decided to look at the tutorials and whilst I can > still learn more I can now access my internet data and merge it into my > family tree and it is through this I have been able to contact others > interested in these families. > > I am also enjoying the opportunity to share the certificates I have bought > with others who are interested in them. as well as photos and family gossip. > The only downside is I am realising how old we are getting when most of my > connections are in their late 70s and how little time there is to get this > work completed for the next generations who have been born into a world so > different from the one we knew and the ones our ancestors lived in. > > Jean in S. Australia. > > > > > Some useful websites - > FREECEN - http://www.freecen.org.uk/ > FREEBMD - http://freebmd.rootsweb.com/ > Want to know where a place in Yorkshire is - Try Genuki > http://www.genuki.org.uk/big/eng/YKS/ > > ------------------------------- > To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to [email protected] with the word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message

    01/03/2010 05:16:59