Well that is encouraging........the fact that no one has done the DNA yet on this line. That means there is still a chance that my husband's Wells weren't hatched but really came from other humans ;-). Seriously, in all that research, you don't see any Johns from that line that might have actually gone to South Carolina in the early 1800s do you? Thanks, kathy Wells. ----- Original Message ----- From: <BaileyWells@att.net> To: <WELLS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:56 PM Subject: [WELLS-L] Re: Wells family Maryland 1679-1836 > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > Classification: Query > > Message Board URL: > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/SCWBAIB/4399.1.1 > > Message Board Post: > > Orin, > The book refered to is "Across the Years in Prince George's County" by > Effie Gwynn Bowie, published in 1947, reprinted in 1975. > Pages 470-473 concern the Daniel Wells I, II, and III families in Ann > Arundel Co. MD. > I have extensive research on them from the MD. Archives, but lost them > after the 1920-30 Coffeyville, Montgomery Co. KS. census, and have not > been able to locate a descendant for a DNA test. > Bailey > > > ==== WELLS Mailing List ==== > Don't Forget > The Wells Family Research Association > http://www.rootsweb.com/~wellsfam/wfrahome.html > >
Kathy, I have found only one John in the Daniel Wells families, he married Elizabeth Hilleary and had one son and one daughter by 1806. Elizabeth died and John married Elizabeth's 1st cousin, Verlinda Hilleary, in 1831. As far as I know he lived and died in A.A. Co. MD. I do not know that this family has not been DNA tested. Bailey ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kathy Wells" <rebeltrumpet@sbcglobal.net> To: <WELLS-L@rootsweb.com> Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 6:28 PM Subject: Re: [WELLS-L] Re: Wells family Maryland 1679-1836 > Well that is encouraging........the fact that no one has done the DNA yet on > this line. That means there is still a chance that my husband's Wells > weren't hatched but really came from other humans > ;-). Seriously, in all that research, you don't see any Johns from that > line that might have actually gone to South Carolina in the early 1800s do > you? > Thanks, kathy Wells. > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: <BaileyWells@att.net> > To: <WELLS-L@rootsweb.com> > Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 11:56 PM > Subject: [WELLS-L] Re: Wells family Maryland 1679-1836 > > > > This is a Message Board Post that is gatewayed to this mailing list. > > > > Classification: Query > > > > Message Board URL: > > > > http://boards.ancestry.com/mbexec/msg/an/SCWBAIB/4399.1.1 > > > > Message Board Post: > > > > Orin, > > The book refered to is "Across the Years in Prince George's County" by > > Effie Gwynn Bowie, published in 1947, reprinted in 1975. > > Pages 470-473 concern the Daniel Wells I, II, and III families in Ann > > Arundel Co. MD. > > I have extensive research on them from the MD. Archives, but lost them > > after the 1920-30 Coffeyville, Montgomery Co. KS. census, and have not > > been able to locate a descendant for a DNA test. > > Bailey > > > > > > ==== WELLS Mailing List ==== > > Don't Forget > > The Wells Family Research Association > > http://www.rootsweb.com/~wellsfam/wfrahome.html > > > > > > > > ==== WELLS Mailing List ==== > To contact Listowner, > Send email to: > dwells@zekes.com > >