Dear Washburn-LIST Subscribers, Tuesday 10 February 1998 I wish to acknowledge the message of Charles E. Washburn, Jr. I totally agree with him. John A. Maltby has done extensive research regarding the Washburn family and I DO CONGRATULATE him for that! I am only saying that their are "two" sides to the story about the Washburn family relationship with William the Conqueror. I hope to publish the "complete" publication of Canon James Davenport, M.A. and present it on the internet for everyone to see. Canon Davenport was very thorough in his Washburn family research. Believe me, I am not discounting John Maltby's research....but, there is "another" resource that has to be considered. I DO THANK you John for your "wonderful" documented accounts of the Washburn family in early England. And, I send to you my apologies that are necessary. You are a very detailed researcher as I have seen and I do appreciate your work! Sincerely, Cousin Chuck ============================================================================ >Dear Sue Apito and Other List Subscribers: > >With regard to the posting by the "other" Chuck Washburn of today to >this list, I wanted to state for the record that "this" Chuck Washburn >has nothing but the highest regard for the quality of John Maltby's >research. As anyone who has subscribed to this list for any period of >time already knows, John has done extensive research regarding the >Washburn family in primary sources, the results of which research he has >taken the time to share with all of us, and his work has been very >helpful to me and other Washburn family researchers. Thank you, John! > >Charles E. Washburn, Jr. >[email protected] >http://home.earthlink.net/~cwashburn/history.html ============================================================================= �