Marilyn Powell & others, At 08:35 PM 8/16/97 -0700, you wrote: >John, > In reading over what you wrote, I am questioning my removal to >another program and wonder if I inadvertently changed a couple of dates. >In the paragraphs below, you wrote in Part I: > >>"The esteemed E.A.B. Barnard, in "Some Notes on the Evesham Branch of the >>Washbourne Family," 1914, found the earliest Washburn entry as the 23 Feb. 1539 >>burial of Thomas Wasborne. I looked carefully through what I could read of the >>1539 burials, but could not verify this record. I did find one burial for that >>date, which I read as: >> >>Ano "1639" Buriings Correction: this actually read "Ano 1539 Buriings" >>The 23rd Daye of February was buried Thomas ___________. > >>The surname, unfortunately, on the microfilm was completely unreadable, being >>in, what appears to be, a dark, moldy part of the page. By the entries, it is >>evident that this date was actually 23 Feb. 1539/40, it appearing in >>chronological sequence after December "1639".< >... >John, I placed the quote signs around the two dates I am wondering about. Is >this the way your records read? > Sorry, these should have been 1539, not 1639!! (My typos.) Thanks for pointing these out, Marilyn. >Thanks for your help. >Marilyn W. POwell >. > > John A. Maltby Redwood City, CA [email protected]