Hi Norma Perhaps the place of birth for John is misleading? Could it be an error on the part of the enumerator, easily done whilst copying the householders form, perhaps the birthplace on the line above has been transposed with Johns? In 1841 both John and Alice are enumerated in Whittington, Grendon, both are born in County As is Ann BALL who is enumerated at the same address with an Elizabeth BALL aged 10 (presumably her daughter?) The same Ann BALL is enumerated with John and Alice in 1851 Ann's birthplace in 1851 is given as Badesley Although I do not see a possible marriage on the IGI there are the following children born to a John and Alice 1. THOMAS DEMINGS - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 13 APR 1804 Baddesley Ensor, Warwick, England 2. JOHN DEMING - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 15 NOV 1801 Baddesley Ensor, Warwick, England 3. RICHARD DEMING - International Genealogical Index Gender: Male Christening: 12 AUG 1808 Baddesley Ensor, Warwick, England 4. SARAH DEMING - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 27 DEC 1799 Baddesley Ensor, Warwick, England 5. MARY DEMING - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 10 APR 1806 Baddesley Ensor, Warwick, England 6. ANNE DEMING - International Genealogical Index Gender: Female Christening: 08 JAN 1811 Baddesley Ensor, Warwick, England There are deaths registered for both John and Alice in Atherstone between 1851 and 1861 I shall send the 1841 over with a copy of this as posts seem to be taking many hours/days to reach the list (if they ever get there) Best wishes Nivard Ovington, in Cornwall (UK) > > Hello Listers. > > Could I once again enlist your help in a census entry. > > The information I require is the birth place of John Deeming found on the > 1851 at Grendon > HO107; Piece: 2064; Folio: 164; Page: 3; GSU roll: 87323. > > The entries are > John Deeming born 1775 Leicestershire and what has been transcribed as > Stupy? > Alice Deeming wife 1776 Austy Warwickshire which I think should be Ansty > Ann Bell 1811 Baddesley. > > I know some of you are extremely good at reading these bad entries. Would > someone please have a look and see what they make of the entries please, I > would > be very grateful > > Thanking you > Norma